Go Back   IceInSpace > Beginners Start Here > Beginners Astrophotography
Register FAQ Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread
  #1  
Old 27-07-2023, 09:09 PM
AstroViking's Avatar
AstroViking (Steve)
Registered User

AstroViking is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2022
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 1,243
We're going to need a bigger BBQ...

Hello all,

We finally had another clear night here a little while ago, so I had the rig outside and ready to capture a new target - IC4628. I’ve seen some interesting images of this emission nebula, and decided it was time to take the plunge and have a go at it.

I spent time making certain I had the camera aligned correctly, so that I had the longest side of the sensor horizontal. Previously, it was at whatever angle it ended up after I assembled the optical train. Which made for some interesting, and potentially odd-looking images; especially if you are used to seeing the target in a particular orientation…

From the NASA website: “South of Antares, in the tail of the nebula-rich constellation Scorpius, lies emission nebula IC 4628. Nearby hot, massive stars, millions of years young, irradiate the nebula with invisible ultraviolet light, stripping electrons from atoms. The electrons eventually recombine with the atoms to produce the visible nebular glow, dominated by the red emission of hydrogen.

At an estimated distance of 6,000 light-years, the region shown is about 250 light-years across, spanning over three full moons on the sky.

The nebula is also cataloged as Gum 56 for Australian astronomer Colin Stanley Gum.”

From the Constellation-guide website: “The Prawn Nebula was discovered by the American astronomer Edward Emerson Barnard around 1900. It is a stellar nursery that contains a large number of very hot, luminous, young stars, formed out of the surrounding gas. These stars include two large, hot, blue-white giants belonging to the rare spectral class O.

O-type stars have a relatively short life span as they tend to burn out very quickly before ending their lives as supernovae and collapsing into either neutron stars or black holes. The blue giants in IC 4628 will end their lives after only about a million years. The material produced by the supernova events will be used to form new stars in the nebula.”

Of course, it wouldn’t be an astro imaging session if everything went according to plan…

After 2 hours of imaging, the mount carried out it’s meridian flip without any problems - it flipped, Ekos re-centred the telescope on the Prawn, and then the guiding failed. Rather than having a tracking error between 1 and 2 arc-seconds, it shot to 30 arc-seconds and stayed there.

A couple of frames worked just fine, then the RMS skyrocketed to about 60 and Ekos stopped taking images. I tried a few things (but not a complete power-down and restart of everything) without success. So I packed everything away for the night and got some sleep.

A couple of nights ago we had clear skies again, so I was itching to capture more data of the Prawn. Another promising night - the images were perfect, the meridian flip ran like and clockwork and the guiding was rock solid at about 1 arc-second RMS all night.

Except for one small, tiny, insignificant problem - the camera was at a different rotation on the optical train. Not a problem, usually, as there’s enough overlap between sessions and SiriL is very good at aligning images. Nope - the angle of rotation was too great to give me a good overlap and the new set of data was useless.

Which leaves me really puzzled - I made no changes to the rig and it’s configuration (that I can recall, anyway!), so I am stumped as to why the second set of images was so far off. This means that the rotator I bought the other month will now become a constant part of the optical train and this problem won’t happen again. (But something else will crop up to frustrate my night.)

I ended up processing the data three different ways and obtained 3 rather different final images. In all three images, I made use of SiriL’s “starnet++” integration to process the nebula and stars as separate images before recombining them into the final image.

As always, feedback and constructive criticism is more than welcome.

(And before you say it, my Dragons image is much, much better!)

Regards,
V


Image data:

* Gain: 100
* Offset: 10
* Temperature: 0 degrees C
* Exposure: 120 seconds
* Frames: 71 Lights, 25 Darks, 50 each of Flats and DarkFlats (2:20 hours integration in total)
* Filter: L-Enhance (Ha + Oiii dual-narrowband)
* Processed with SiriL (stacking and pre-processing) then finished in Affinity Photo v2

Equipment:

* SW72ED @ 357mm / HEQ5-Pro / ASI183MC-Pro / SV165+SV305 / Kstars/Ekos
Attached Thumbnails
Click for full-size image (IC4628-Process-1.jpg)
219.8 KB79 views
Click for full-size image (IC4628-Process-2.jpg)
208.4 KB92 views
Click for full-size image (IC4628-Process-3.jpg)
207.8 KB107 views
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 27-07-2023, 11:33 PM
oska (John)
Illucid

oska is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2018
Location: Federal
Posts: 736
Nice one V. Maybe it was that old BBQ classic of forgetting to test click the tongs before using them? We know traditionally that can lead one to the twilight zone. How far out was the rotation?
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 28-07-2023, 08:44 AM
xelasnave's Avatar
xelasnave
Gravity does not Suck

xelasnave is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Tabulam
Posts: 17,003
Nothing wrong with that Steve and thanks for an interesting read.

alex
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 28-07-2023, 09:28 AM
Dennis
Dazzled by the Cosmos.

Dennis is offline
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Brisbane
Posts: 11,817
Nicely rescued Steve, the trials and tribulations of an astrophotographer seem endless at times, but a good recovery.

Cheers

Dennis
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 28-07-2023, 08:34 PM
AstroViking's Avatar
AstroViking (Steve)
Registered User

AstroViking is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2022
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 1,243
Evening all,

Thanks for the reminder, oska - I forgot to click the BBQ tongs together before starting. That'll learn me...

Alex, glad you liked the read. Maybe I'm the odd one out here, but I like reading about what I'm looking at. If I can impart a bit of knowledge to the reader then I feel that's a good thing. (I concede it can be a bit daunting to see a wall of text when all you want are the pretty pictures.)

It wasn't a rescue, Dennis - it was me chucking out the second lot of data and processing what I had. I'm not super happy with it and hope to get more data later and come up with something better.

The attached image is the result of stacking both sets of data. You can see where something went terribly wrong and why I didn't bother working with it.

Cheers,
V
Attached Thumbnails
Click for full-size image (IC4628_RGB.jpg)
143.4 KB65 views
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +10. The time is now 08:56 PM.

Powered by vBulletin Version 3.8.7 | Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Advertisement
Bintel
Advertisement