Go Back   IceInSpace > Beginners Start Here > Beginners Astrophotography
Register FAQ Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread
  #1  
Old 07-04-2023, 06:51 PM
oska (John)
Illucid

oska is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2018
Location: Federal
Posts: 736
Carina with Easter Stars

I've been experimenting with a Startravel 120/600 for narrowband, for fun.
Ordinarily one might be disappointed by cruciform stars (top left is worst) but hey it's good Friday

Just combination, DBE, SPCC, STF stretch, starless, removed most of the green from the stars, quick histogram tweak to bring down the background a touch (100px clipped), rescreen.

BX really highlights the astigmatism (2nd).
The top left crop shows it better (3rd)

I would love some pointers on how to fix the stars?

About 5hrs of 300s & 600s in SHO

SW 120/600 + orion flattener
ASI160MM + Antlia 3nm SHO
CEM40EC (0.21" total )

NIINA + PI

Peace Love & Mung beans.
Attached Thumbnails
Click for full-size image (SHO-1.jpg)
193.1 KB92 views
Click for full-size image (SHO_BX-1.jpg)
199.4 KB98 views
Click for full-size image (SHO_BXcrop.jpg)
181.1 KB94 views
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 08-04-2023, 09:30 AM
Bodon (Steve)
Registered User

Bodon is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2021
Location: Nowra
Posts: 286
John
I have the same problem with stars. You can use the image inspector in ASTAP to inspect a file. Over my head. My stars are a shocker when using a more sensitive camera. Fairly certain curvature may be at play. Slight tilt could be corrected by pulling the train apart and putting back together if it exists. My SW72 is not the best thats why I crop....poor optics; I have what I see in my reflector....coma. They are great with eyepieces but a camera will show flaws.
Two weeks ago I sold one of my kidneys and bought a ZWO 2600 Pro and filters. I manged to get out the other night and took 8x240sec shots with Sii Ha Oiii, 24 pics all up. Flying seagulls in the corners. If I was using my ZWO 183 they would be less pronounced.

Last edited by Bodon; 08-04-2023 at 10:26 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 08-04-2023, 11:00 AM
JA
.....

JA is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2016
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 3,052
Quote:
Originally Posted by oska View Post
BX really highlights the astigmatism (2nd).
The top left crop shows it better (3rd)

I would love some pointers on how to fix the stars?

About 5hrs of 300s & 600s in SHO

SW 120/600 + orion flattener
ASI160MM + Antlia 3nm SHO
CEM40EC (0.21" total )

NIINA + PI

Peace Love & Mung beans.
Hi John,

When the image is looked at in its entirety the aberrations are not that obvious and still a fine image, but if you want to chase things further you could:

1. Critically compare all 4 corners to see if there is any difference in the aberration. If you see a significant difference in corner to corner aberrations then you could try some form of tilt adjustment to even this out / reduce it before....

2. Reducing the aperture of the optic. Rather than crop the image as some do to reduce such artifacts, try using an aperture mask up in front of the optic. Try reducing the OTA from its native 120mm to say 100mm, by using a black paper or similar annulus cut to size. This will prevent light entering the more extreme edges of the optic where the light is bent more to get to the focal plane and thereby reduce some of the aberrations, chromatic aberrations in particular, but also astigmatism and coma. Of course doing this has the disadvantage of "losing light" and your 5 hours of imaging, in light gathering terms is now more like 4 hours 10 minutes, but with better stars and potentially the full field of view available to your camera, without the cropping that would otherwise have been necessary to remove the aberrations somewhat, at the expense of a lessened field of view.

Maybe aperture masking to 100mm is/is not enough, so experiment to taste.


Best
JA

Last edited by JA; 08-04-2023 at 12:19 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 08-04-2023, 03:07 PM
oska (John)
Illucid

oska is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2018
Location: Federal
Posts: 736
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bodon View Post
John
I have the same problem with stars. You can use the image inspector in ASTAP to inspect a file. Over my head. My stars are a shocker when using a more sensitive camera. Fairly certain curvature may be at play. Slight tilt could be corrected by pulling the train apart and putting back together if it exists. My SW72 is not the best thats why I crop....poor optics; I have what I see in my reflector....coma. They are great with eyepieces but a camera will show flaws.
Two weeks ago I sold one of my kidneys and bought a ZWO 2600 Pro and filters. I manged to get out the other night and took 8x240sec shots with Sii Ha Oiii, 24 pics all up. Flying seagulls in the corners. If I was using my ZWO 183 they would be less pronounced.
Thanks Steve. I've got a better focuser for it but I have to machine an adapter yet. Congrats on the 2600! I need one.

Quote:
Originally Posted by JA View Post
Hi John,

When the image is looked at in its entirety the aberrations are not that obvious and still a fine image, but if you want to chase things further you could:

1. Critically compare all 4 corners to see if there is any difference in the aberration. If you see a significant difference in corner to corner aberrations then you could try some form of tilt adjustment to even this out / reduce it before....

2. Reducing the aperture of the optic. Rather than crop the image as some do to reduce such artifacts, try using an aperture mask up in front of the optic. Try reducing the OTA from its native 120mm to say 100mm, by using a black paper or similar annulus cut to size. This will prevent light entering the more extreme edges of the optic where the light is bent more to get to the focal plane and thereby reduce some of the aberrations, chromatic aberrations in particular, but also astigmatism and coma. Of course doing this has the disadvantage of "losing light" and your 5 hours of imaging, in light gathering terms is now more like 4 hours 10 minutes, but with better stars and potentially the full field of view available to your camera, without the cropping that would otherwise have been necessary to remove the aberrations somewhat, at the expense of a lessened field of view.

Maybe aperture masking to 100mm is/is not enough, so experiment to taste.


Best
JA

Cheers JA!
Very much appreciated. I'll get onto both and report back.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 09-04-2023, 01:38 AM
xelasnave's Avatar
xelasnave
Gravity does not Suck

xelasnave is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Tabulam
Posts: 17,003
Nice work and you will find your stars will improve when you get set up permanent in an observatory
Great effort I only wish I could come close.
Alex
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 09-04-2023, 09:55 PM
oska (John)
Illucid

oska is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2018
Location: Federal
Posts: 736
Thanks Alex, I'm pretty sure a 2600mm will help in the interim.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +10. The time is now 07:13 AM.

Powered by vBulletin Version 3.8.7 | Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Advertisement
Bintel
Advertisement