Go Back   IceInSpace > Equipment > ATM and DIY Projects
Register FAQ Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread
  #1  
Old 20-12-2022, 04:12 PM
mura_gadi's Avatar
mura_gadi (Steve)
SpeakingB4Thinking

mura_gadi is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2019
Location: Canberra
Posts: 829
Focuser travel requirements

Hello,

I have designed and about to commission a focuser I am working on and I'm wonder about the focuser's travel requirements. The current design allows for only the thickness of the tube and the focuser base plate or can extend below the base plate if required.

I am building for a visual scope hence the closer to the tube design, but would like the focuser unit to be able to move to a astrophotography setup as well, as it's going to cost a small motza and I would like to make it as versatile as possible.

How much travel should I work towards to have a focuser that will allow for both visual and astrophotography work? (Min/Max height is really dependant on the flange/safety kerfs of the EP's x2 - which is around 25mm, or 5-50mm of travel. Or I could design for Morpheus EP's and have 5-90mm of travel which seems a lot...)

So, how much travel should I be looking to build into the design?


Thanks
Steve
I'm using Newt for the Web to work out field of illumination and secondary sizes.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 20-12-2022, 06:36 PM
Saturnine (Jeff)
Registered User

Saturnine is offline
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Wollongong
Posts: 2,300
Hi Steve

You don't mention what size mirror , focal length etc. Also depends on what sort of camera you envisage using with the scope. If an DSLR you need 55mm of extra intravel from the visual focal point. If for an CCD camera then they only need about 12 / 15mm intravel usually. So I would imagine that 20/25mm of focuser drawtube travel should be plenty enough.
Those distances get skewed around if allowing for filter wheels or filter draws as well. Then the focal plane has to further out from the tube wall to accommodate. The filter draw is a bit more friendly to focal travel than filter wheels but it is all a compromise. A lowest profile focuser design as possible while providing 20 / 50mm travel to allow for cameras, good luck.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 20-12-2022, 08:11 PM
mura_gadi's Avatar
mura_gadi (Steve)
SpeakingB4Thinking

mura_gadi is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2019
Location: Canberra
Posts: 829
Sorry, good point to have missed...

8" F9, not really a astrophotography scope, but I want to be able to take it to a faster scope later. How much would the travel change between scopes, say the same size but 3 F stops different. Or the same F ratio and 4-6" difference in size?

Last edited by mura_gadi; 20-12-2022 at 08:31 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 20-12-2022, 10:40 PM
Saturnine (Jeff)
Registered User

Saturnine is offline
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Wollongong
Posts: 2,300
The focuser travel difference for visual vs CCD doesn't change regardless of focal length or ratio, whatever the distance the focal plane is from the secondary for visual ,the CCD chip is set inside the camera body about 15mm from the T adapter . So for the camera you will still need to focus inward about the 15mm for the focal plane to reach the sensor.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 20-12-2022, 10:43 PM
Saturnine (Jeff)
Registered User

Saturnine is offline
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Wollongong
Posts: 2,300
An 200mm f9 would be a bit of a beast to mount steadily but would make for a decent lunar and planetary scope, presuming it is a good mirror.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +10. The time is now 09:51 AM.

Powered by vBulletin Version 3.8.7 | Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Advertisement
Bintel
Advertisement