Go Back   IceInSpace > Images > Solar System
Register FAQ Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread
  #1  
Old 28-04-2007, 11:43 PM
Omaroo's Avatar
Omaroo (Chris Malikoff)
Let there be night...

Omaroo is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Hobart, TAS
Posts: 7,639
How do you obtain proper focus on a webcam?

Hi all

Just thought I'd take the new ZenithStar 66ED out tonight for a spin and thought as I was setting up "time to use that ToUcam that's been sitting there since I bought it". So... this was going to be my first real go at imaging. I rigged it all up and.... well... think that it's really difficult to achieve good focus. How on earth do you guys do it? I haven't fiddled with these particular images in PhotoShop, but I have tried on others. Applying various sharpening algorithms simply overcooked the images and contrast looked horribly overdone. Is there a simple method? What's the secret of focussing with a webcam? Resolution is only VGA (640x480) so I suppose that great results are going to be hard to get anyhow. Focussing "on-screen" in real time is very difficult - I could not get any sharper that these are already - 10:1 focus control and all.....

Time to go DSLR I think. At least I can look at an image on the focal plane as I focus......

Any advice?

Cheers and thanks everyone
Chris
Attached Thumbnails
Click for full-size image (moon280407_1.jpg)
148.4 KB54 views
Click for full-size image (moon280407_5_grey_2x.jpg)
130.0 KB43 views
Click for full-size image (moon280407_7_2x.jpg)
116.2 KB28 views

Last edited by Omaroo; 29-04-2007 at 10:08 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 29-04-2007, 12:00 AM
rat156's Avatar
rat156
Registered User

rat156 is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 1,696
Hi Chris,

A Hartmann mask will help, but only on points sources like stars.

Use one (star) close to your target, then move to the target, then don't play with the focus.

There's a link in IIS on how to make a Hartmann mask.

Cheers
Stuart
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 29-04-2007, 12:08 AM
Omaroo's Avatar
Omaroo (Chris Malikoff)
Let there be night...

Omaroo is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Hobart, TAS
Posts: 7,639
Thanks Stuart. I'll check this out. Looking at other ToUcam images of the moon on the net I don't think I did too badly now. Most of them are incredibly grainey and most are totally out of focus. Oh well - time to improve my own I guess.

Thanks
Chris
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 29-04-2007, 12:11 AM
[1ponders]'s Avatar
[1ponders] (Paul)
Retired, damn no pension

[1ponders] is offline
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Obi Obi, Qld
Posts: 18,778
What are you using to control your capture Chris? There is a free program called QCFocus (QuickCam) that you can use to both capture and focus. I have not used it but you could try it. I use K3CCDTools V3 which has a great focus assist built in. But as Stuart has says it is much easier to focus on a star, or if one is available, a mountain just peeking over the terminator and you focus on the mountain top.

At the FOV you are getting it is going to be tough to get a nice crisp image anyway. Try using a barlow, taking multiple higher res shots and then mosaicing them to capture that nice crisp large moon.

If none of these are options then you can focus as Stuart has says with a hartmann mask or even laying two pieces of dowel across the aperture in a cross.

Good luck with it.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 29-04-2007, 12:15 AM
Omaroo's Avatar
Omaroo (Chris Malikoff)
Let there be night...

Omaroo is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Hobart, TAS
Posts: 7,639
I was just using the ToUcam software - VLounge, Paul. I was also using a 2x barlow - as such is the FOV through an f/6 66mm scope. I'll upgrade to a good quality barlow first I think (I'm using a 2" $25 special).

I have to say that I cranked up K3CCDTools and it scared the hell out of me. Where the heck to start? It's a complex-looking app, which requires actually understanding the underlying principles first, I think. I will try QCFocus though. Looks good!

I'll give it a ...gulp....go though!

Cheers and thanks
Chris
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 29-04-2007, 12:17 AM
Ric's Avatar
Ric
Support your local RFS

Ric is offline
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Wamboin NSW
Posts: 12,405
Hi Chris, they have turned out very nice for your first real go.
You have captured some fine details and the moon is quite bright at the moment.

Top stuff
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 29-04-2007, 12:22 AM
Omaroo's Avatar
Omaroo (Chris Malikoff)
Let there be night...

Omaroo is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Hobart, TAS
Posts: 7,639
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ric View Post
Hi Chris, they have turned out very nice for your first real go.
You have captured some fine details and the moon is quite bright at the moment.

Top stuff
Thanks Ric We try, huh? The moon certainly is bright too. The poor little webcam had real problems initialising and coming to a stable image until I stuck a moon filter on. Whoops - should have included that in the folio.....

Cheers
Chris
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 29-04-2007, 12:23 AM
[1ponders]'s Avatar
[1ponders] (Paul)
Retired, damn no pension

[1ponders] is offline
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Obi Obi, Qld
Posts: 18,778
It does look a bit scary but stick to looking through the program settings (the hammer and screwdriver icon) for the video capture settings. That is where you set up the destination folder for your avi and the naming conventions.

Then check out the Video Source (exposure) (camera icon) for you exposure, gain and frame rate. Untick any check boxes for auto control. (If you have tracking then you can leave the autowhite balance set for the time being) Set your brightness to the middle, your frame rate to around 10fps (good for average nights) your gain to around 30%-40% and then drop your exposure rate until you get a nice even illumination. If it a bit burnt out in areas, drop your gain and reduce your exposure (eg go from 1/500 to 1/250) and then try adjusting your gain again.

See how you go from there.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 29-04-2007, 12:27 AM
Omaroo's Avatar
Omaroo (Chris Malikoff)
Let there be night...

Omaroo is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Hobart, TAS
Posts: 7,639
Thanks Paul! I'll give it all a go!

Cheers
Chris
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 29-04-2007, 12:53 AM
Ric's Avatar
Ric
Support your local RFS

Ric is offline
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Wamboin NSW
Posts: 12,405
It's a bit off topic Chris but how is your bino-telescope progressing?

Cheers
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 29-04-2007, 01:00 AM
Omaroo's Avatar
Omaroo (Chris Malikoff)
Let there be night...

Omaroo is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Hobart, TAS
Posts: 7,639
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ric View Post
It's a bit off topic Chris but how is your bino-telescope progressing?

Cheers
The mirrors are underway with Mark, Ric. I have two matched 12" f/5 units in the works. I've ordered helical 3-vane spiders from the USA as well as Moonlite truss clamps. I've taken plenty of photos so that Mark and Paul can comment on dimensions - so I can then go and cad-up the box and secondary cages. Once that's done I'll get a mate of mine to turn them out on a Morbidelli CNC wood authoring machine. Should be nice! I then have to come up with push-button controls to wind the mirror co-collimation bolts in and out by stepper motors.

Lots to do.....

Cheers
Chris
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 29-04-2007, 01:06 AM
Ric's Avatar
Ric
Support your local RFS

Ric is offline
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Wamboin NSW
Posts: 12,405
Excellent Chris, definately sounds like all systems are go.

Cheers
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 29-04-2007, 10:21 AM
sheeny's Avatar
sheeny (Al)
Spam Hunter

sheeny is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Oberon NSW
Posts: 14,438
Chris,

They look pretty good to me for first time shots!

You've already got some good advice here so I won't re-hash that other than to encourage you to get to know K3. Yep, it looks daunting when you first fire it up, but it's really not that bad. Just play with it a bit to get to know where things are and setup your camera, etc in the toolbox as Paul mentioned. It won't take long - it'll look like an old friend!

BTW I'm assuming these images were stacks not single frames?

I'll throw a few tips in to complement the other stuff you have already:

Quote:
Originally Posted by Omaroo View Post
Hi all

Just thought I'd take the new ZenithStar 66ED out tonight for a spin and thought as I was setting up "time to use that ToUcam that's been sitting there since I bought it". So... this was going to be my first real go at imaging. I rigged it all up and.... well... think that it's really difficult to achieve good focus. How on earth do you guys do it? I haven't fiddled with these particular images in PhotoShop, but I have tried on others. Applying various sharpening algorithms simply overcooked the images and contrast looked horribly overdone.
You need a bit of room to move on your exposure meter. Aim for the brightest part of your image to be in the range 180 to 220. If the seeing is good, you can go to 220, but drop it a bit as the seeing deteriorates. It just gives you the opportunity to be more aggressive with sharpening (to compensate for the poor seeing) without burning out your highlights. It's never as good as good focus and good seeing, but... if your like me you try to extract as good an image as you can from the data you get.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Omaroo View Post
Is there a simple method? What's the secret of focussing with a webcam? Focussing "on-screen" in real time is very difficult - I could not get any sharper that these are already - 10:1 focus control and all.....

Time to go DSLR I think. At least I can look at an image on the focal plane as I focus......

Any advice?

Cheers and thanks everyone
Chris
Another technique I have found works for me is to make a focus adjustment and then just watch the preview for a while. If you are getting a few sharp frames every once in a while, then chances are your focus is as good as you'll get in those seeing conditions. I know when I was new to it, I was trying to improve the focus (i.e. get more sharp frames) beyond what the seeing would allow.

If you can work with the Hartmann mask, do that. But if you have only done a rough alignment (portable gear not permanent mount) and you don't have a parfocal EP/camera combination (as I don't when using filters on my ToUcam) the above method may help.

Al.
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 29-04-2007, 11:12 AM
Omaroo's Avatar
Omaroo (Chris Malikoff)
Let there be night...

Omaroo is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Hobart, TAS
Posts: 7,639
Thanks for your advice Al, and it looks like parfocal rings might be the next go.
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 29-04-2007, 04:38 PM
Omaroo's Avatar
Omaroo (Chris Malikoff)
Let there be night...

Omaroo is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Hobart, TAS
Posts: 7,639
Any better? This one fluked better focus I think. I had to reduce image quality to upload it here.

Mike - any chance of implementing links to image libraries via BB code?
Attached Thumbnails
Click for full-size image (moon280407_6_2xa.jpg)
126.0 KB40 views
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 29-04-2007, 06:22 PM
Ric's Avatar
Ric
Support your local RFS

Ric is offline
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Wamboin NSW
Posts: 12,405
Looks good Chris, the shadows and highlights along the terminator have come up very nice.

Cheers
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 29-04-2007, 06:39 PM
Omaroo's Avatar
Omaroo (Chris Malikoff)
Let there be night...

Omaroo is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Hobart, TAS
Posts: 7,639
Thanks Ric. Yep - it's better. I think that seeing will influence it now, so I just have to wait until I can try again..... dang cloud!
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 30-04-2007, 01:36 AM
bluescope's Avatar
bluescope
I've got a Sirius eye !

bluescope is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Country W.A.
Posts: 1,587
Nice images Chris !

I hooked up my SPC900NC the other night and did some images of the moon. I haven't been able to do any processing because the VLounge software outputs MPEG files and Registax won't read them or am I doing something wrong ?

Does anybody know of a good FREE converter to convert the MPEG's to AVI's ?

Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 30-04-2007, 07:34 AM
[1ponders]'s Avatar
[1ponders] (Paul)
Retired, damn no pension

[1ponders] is offline
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Obi Obi, Qld
Posts: 18,778
Try Virtual Dub Steve, though you should be able to take straight from VideoImpression (not VLounge) to Reg.

http://www.virtualdub.org/
Reply With Quote
  #20  
Old 30-04-2007, 09:12 AM
Omaroo's Avatar
Omaroo (Chris Malikoff)
Let there be night...

Omaroo is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Hobart, TAS
Posts: 7,639
Steve - Thanks

I used VRecord - which is a component of the VLounge suite - and it outputs .AVI files natively.

Cheers
Chris

Quote:
Originally Posted by bluescope View Post
Nice images Chris !

I hooked up my SPC900NC the other night and did some images of the moon. I haven't been able to do any processing because the VLounge software outputs MPEG files and Registax won't read them or am I doing something wrong ?

Does anybody know of a good FREE converter to convert the MPEG's to AVI's ?

Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +10. The time is now 11:28 AM.

Powered by vBulletin Version 3.8.7 | Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Advertisement
Astrophotography Prize
Advertisement
Bintel
Advertisement