Go Back   IceInSpace > Equipment > Equipment Discussions
Register FAQ Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread
  #1  
Old 26-02-2007, 03:20 PM
JohnH's Avatar
JohnH
Member # 159

JohnH is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: NSW
Posts: 1,226
Interesting (new?) Guidecam

Anyone know this outfit?

http://ccd-labs.com

Their QGuide

http://www.ccd-labs.com/Qseries/qguide.htm

sounds very interesting - direct ST4 output low cost, high sensitivity...hmmm....seems to need PHD for setup, not clear how it would guide without but interesting....
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 26-02-2007, 03:53 PM
ballaratdragons's Avatar
ballaratdragons (Ken)
The 'DRAGON MAN'

ballaratdragons is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: In the Dark at Snake Valley, Victoria
Posts: 14,412
WOW! At US$1900 introductory price for the Q8-HR you would expect better then square stars!

I looked in the gallery and the majority of stars are square.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 26-02-2007, 03:54 PM
Striker's Avatar
Striker (Tony)
Whats visual Astronomy

Striker is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Brisbane
Posts: 5,062
Cmos chip with tiny pixels.....I wouldn't bother with it but it is cheap.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 26-02-2007, 05:38 PM
netwolf's Avatar
netwolf
Registered User

netwolf is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 2,949
This company is the US Distributor for the QHY cameras. Gama has posted some decent images he has taken with the QHY8. The US Distributors adjust the camera's to include external power supply etc for local distribution.

There have been decent images taken with this setup posted on CN and IIS. 1900$ is cheap compared to an SBIG with similar chip. The qhy forums have a good collection of user images to check out. Qhy is also investigating a 11MP camera.

The CMOS guide camera uses the same chip as used in the SAC4-2 camera. The difference is that it has built in guiding.

Note I have no affiliation with the vendors. I am happy to see some competition to an otherwise overpriced market. I am saving up to get myself a QHy6 or better QHy2 which is similar to the DSI II PRo.

Regards
Fahim
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 26-02-2007, 07:06 PM
JohnH's Avatar
JohnH
Member # 159

JohnH is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: NSW
Posts: 1,226
Quote:
Originally Posted by ballaratdragons View Post
WOW! At US$1900 introductory price for the Q8-HR you would expect better then square stars!

I looked in the gallery and the majority of stars are square.

Err, I was only referring to the QGuide....any views on that....
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 26-02-2007, 07:20 PM
netwolf's Avatar
netwolf
Registered User

netwolf is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 2,949
John,

Here is the official thread on the QHY forums discussing the CMOS guide camera.
http://qhyccd.com/ccdbbs/index.php?topic=20.0

One of the members has posted some of his pictures taken with the camera here.
http://qhyccd.com/ccdbbs/index.php?topic=50.0

Also check out the SAC4-2 and the Orion Starshoot for similar chip camera's. You can then see what images have been taken with them to compare with.

As a Gudie camera I think its quiet good as it has built in ST4 guider. I assume this means that you can plug this direct into your autogudier ports that support st4, with no need for an external software like guidedog etc.


Regards
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 26-02-2007, 08:31 PM
rogerg's Avatar
rogerg (Roger)
Registered User

rogerg is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Perth, Western Australia
Posts: 4,563
Quote:
Originally Posted by JohnH View Post
Err, I was only referring to the QGuide....any views on that....
Yes... I think that looks like a great guider. The small pixel size would suit both of my guide scopes very well. As it is I use a webcam which has a 5.6x5.6 pixel size. Such small pixel sizes suit the small guide scopes nicely, means you don't need such a long focal length.

Very affordable price too.

I'm tempted but with the webcam that's doing the job ok for me now I won't seriously consider one until I get anoyed at the webcam.

My 2c worth.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 26-02-2007, 09:06 PM
JohnH's Avatar
JohnH
Member # 159

JohnH is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: NSW
Posts: 1,226
Quote:
Originally Posted by netwolf View Post
...As a Gudie camera I think its quiet good as it has built in ST4 guider. I assume this means that you can plug this direct into your autogudier ports that support st4, with no need for an external software like guidedog etc.
That is what has piqued my interest for sure - I'll check the forums for more info...thanks for the links...
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 26-02-2007, 09:44 PM
netwolf's Avatar
netwolf
Registered User

netwolf is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 2,949
Johm,

I notice in your signature you mention the Orion Starshoot, if I am not mistaken this has the same chip in it.

Regards
Fahim
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 27-02-2007, 01:38 AM
Ambermile's Avatar
Ambermile
I make stuff...

Ambermile is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: South Norfolk, UK
Posts: 229
... but the starshoot (and indeed other SAC cameras) are no more ?

Arthur

PS Atik 16IC?
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 27-02-2007, 01:49 AM
netwolf's Avatar
netwolf
Registered User

netwolf is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 2,949
The Orion DSO Starshoot is no more, as it was being made for them by SAC.
They have released a new ORion Starshoot Solar/Lunar cam, which uses the CMOS chip used on this guide camera.
There is also a camera called the Starfish in the US that uses the same chip.

Regards
Fahim
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 27-02-2007, 03:41 AM
Ambermile's Avatar
Ambermile
I make stuff...

Ambermile is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: South Norfolk, UK
Posts: 229
Right. So what about the Atik16IC then?
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 27-02-2007, 05:48 AM
netwolf's Avatar
netwolf
Registered User

netwolf is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 2,949
Ambermile, the ATIK16 cameras are the next evolution of the camera originally started by Steve Chambers and co as a kit camera. The QHY cameras user the same sensors, you can chose which particular one you want. Withing each series there is a range you can select from. The QHY are much more affordable than the ATIK's which are still well priced compard to the Sbig and Stellacam.

From a bang for buck the QHY is the clear winner. And from the images I have seen from the latest QHY camera's is awesome. The ATIK's have a great reputation, the name Steve Chambers is etched in history for the long exposure mods. Either camera is still far more affordable than the SBIG's, and its good to have options and competition in the market.

Regards
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 27-02-2007, 05:55 AM
Ambermile's Avatar
Ambermile
I make stuff...

Ambermile is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: South Norfolk, UK
Posts: 229
Umm, no. The Atik16 and 16HR cameras *are* the kit cameras. The 16IC is a camera designed to compete with the DSI II and thereabouts, which is why they are ccd-based still rather than cmos. The 16IC is decidedly *not* an "evolution" of the kit cameras but a new design completely.

As you say though, the price is not too bad for a cmos camera.

Arthur
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 27-02-2007, 05:55 AM
netwolf's Avatar
netwolf
Registered User

netwolf is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 2,949
The ATIK 16IC resolution less than QHY6. QHY6 is half the price of the ATIK 16IC.

Regards
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 27-02-2007, 06:00 AM
Ambermile's Avatar
Ambermile
I make stuff...

Ambermile is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: South Norfolk, UK
Posts: 229
Lets not get into mudslinging eh? Only the 8 shows on the website and is $1900. What is the 6 spec?

http://qhyccd.com/ccdbbs/index.php?topic=50.0 shows Boothee's pics, not with a Q anything?
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 27-02-2007, 06:01 AM
netwolf's Avatar
netwolf
Registered User

netwolf is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 2,949
Arthur you are correct abou the IC, is a new design. The price is the same as a QHY2 which offer almost double the resolution. The DSI II PRo and the QHY6 are similar resolution but qhy is half the price.

Regards

Last edited by netwolf; 27-02-2007 at 06:12 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 27-02-2007, 06:10 AM
Ambermile's Avatar
Ambermile
I make stuff...

Ambermile is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: South Norfolk, UK
Posts: 229
But the 2 is cmos, surely? Which was my point. If it is ccd-based then I apologise but I cannot find any spec for other than the 8 and the Guide?

Arthur
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 27-02-2007, 06:10 AM
netwolf's Avatar
netwolf
Registered User

netwolf is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 2,949
Arthur, I dont sell these camera's so i have no resson to sling mud . I am just pointing out the specifications and price differences. And I leave it to the people who own them to show what has been done with them. I dont own any so I can only report what I have read.
I do have a personal interest in wanting to see more affordable camera.

The QHY6 uses a sony CCD with resolution equivalent to the DSI II camera's.
http://qhyccd.com/ccdbbs/index.php?topic=41.0

I made an error before the QHY2 is higher resolution than the DSI II Pro and is slightly less expensive.

Regards
Reply With Quote
  #20  
Old 27-02-2007, 06:18 AM
Ambermile's Avatar
Ambermile
I make stuff...

Ambermile is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: South Norfolk, UK
Posts: 229
OK. So the 6 uses the 259, but the 16IC uses the 429 which is the same 752x582 but which uses 25% larger pixels...
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +10. The time is now 02:04 AM.

Powered by vBulletin Version 3.8.7 | Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Advertisement
Bintel
Advertisement