Go Back   IceInSpace > Equipment > Equipment Discussions
Register FAQ Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread
  #1  
Old 03-04-2007, 03:05 AM
bluescope's Avatar
bluescope
I've got a Sirius eye !

bluescope is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Country W.A.
Posts: 1,587
Meade LPI vs Celestron Neximage

Does anyone have experience with these cameras for guiding ? It looks like Autostar Suite with Meade has specific guiding features .... what about the Neximage ( software ) ? I know there are various free guiding programs i.e. Guidedog and the like ( I have downloaded a few ) but I have not used any at this stage so I'm curious for some opinions. I don't want to mess around with modifying webcams and I know that LPI is cosmos vs Neximage is CCD etc. Just some hands on knowledge please !
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 03-04-2007, 05:58 AM
iceman's Avatar
iceman (Mike)
Sir Post a Lot!

iceman is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Gosford, NSW, Australia
Posts: 36,799
For guiding, I think the LPI is probably the better choice due to its ability to do longer exposures than the NexImage.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 03-04-2007, 07:11 AM
CoombellKid
Registered User

CoombellKid is offline
 
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 2,590
LPI although may have a longer exposure. The chip isn't really sensitive on
faint stars, if that is all you have to guide with in the field. Have you thought
about a DSI?

However I only have experience with imaging with the LPI and not guiding so
someone else may have a better answer.

regards,CS
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 03-04-2007, 10:11 AM
Wombat_In_Space's Avatar
Wombat_In_Space (Darren)
Registered User

Wombat_In_Space is offline
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Cranbourne
Posts: 315
A stock ToUcam is good choice for a guide camera and cheaper than both your options you have asked about. Check out Ballaratdragons setup het uses for DSo imaging.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 03-04-2007, 10:19 AM
JohnG's Avatar
JohnG (John)
Looking Down From Above

JohnG is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Cootamundra, NSW
Posts: 1,711
Hi

I use an LPI as a guide camera in my field setup, it uses PHD as the guiding software, I just loaded the LPI drivers, not the complete Autostar setup.

As has already been mentioned, it is not that sensitive and really needs a fairly bright star to guide on. That said, using PHD and the LPI, I have no trouble guiding a Losmandy GM-8 vide a Shoestring Astronomy GPUSB with my Laptop. My field setup is confined to a short 600 mm telescope though, I doubt it would be good enough for anything much longer in focal length, I think then a Toucam would come into it's own then.

Cheers

JohnG

Last edited by JohnG; 03-04-2007 at 12:02 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 04-04-2007, 03:45 AM
bluescope's Avatar
bluescope
I've got a Sirius eye !

bluescope is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Country W.A.
Posts: 1,587
Thanks for your opinions guys !
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 06-04-2007, 03:04 PM
bluescope's Avatar
bluescope
I've got a Sirius eye !

bluescope is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Country W.A.
Posts: 1,587
ToUcam

I notice you have a ToUcam Mike, do you just use it for your planetary imaging or do you use it for guiding too ?
Sorry for such a slow reply to this !

Quote:
Originally Posted by iceman View Post
For guiding, I think the LPI is probably the better choice due to its ability to do longer exposures than the NexImage.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +10. The time is now 02:20 PM.

Powered by vBulletin Version 3.8.7 | Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Advertisement
Bintel
Advertisement
Astrophotography Prize
Advertisement