Go Back   IceInSpace > Equipment > Software and Computers
Register FAQ Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread
  #1  
Old 12-03-2007, 09:56 AM
NightCal's Avatar
NightCal
Registered User

NightCal is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Worcester, England
Posts: 57
Spec. for observatory computer?

The computer in my observatory has just slipped off this mortal coil and hence I'm in the market for a cheap computer to replace it.
It needs to:
Run a Phillips Toucam Pro II for imaging without dropping frames
Run a Meade DSI 1 colour
Control my Meade LX200.
Run K3CCD tools.
It would be nice if it could run multpoint alignment on Registax 4, but this isn't strictly necessary as I have a Pentium 4 computer in the study that will handle this.
I'm looking at machine with the following spec:
Celeron 2000 processor, 160GB hard disk, 512DDR memory, 16x DvDRW and AGP onboard graphics. I already have a 250GB external IDE hard drive for back ups.
Thoughts please. Do you think this will do the job? No "well of course a Mac G6 would be best"-type suggestions please; I'm on a VERY tight budget for this.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 15-03-2007, 09:09 PM
mikeash
Registered User

mikeash is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Whakatane, nz
Posts: 28
I was on a very tight budget and did this:

canibalised old P2 system (case, hard drive, cd rom)
bought new motherboard asus m2npv AM2 (onboard sound graphics)
512 M ram
new PSU
CPU = AMD Athlon64 3200 socket AM2
OS = Debian Etch (Linux, free)
Monitor = old svga I had lying around
some fiddling to get the screen right (1280x960 virtual screen on 1024x760 display setting)

total cost < NZ$400 (about 150 pounds sterling)

It runs qastrocam for tucam840
registax4 via wine (win32 emulation)

you need to be a little computer savvy for setting it up

I can't confirm your other software needs will be met so some risk in attempting this I think

Mike
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 15-03-2007, 11:45 PM
rogerg's Avatar
rogerg (Roger)
Registered User

rogerg is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Perth, Western Australia
Posts: 4,563
What you have suggested sounds almost more powerful than my 2.4gighz pentium, and mine does a lot more than what you're wanting.

I would've thought you'd be alright with what you have suggested no problems.

Of course more power is always better, but you can also work with what you have, within reason.

Roger.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +10. The time is now 03:42 PM.

Powered by vBulletin Version 3.8.7 | Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Advertisement
Astrophotography Prize
Advertisement
Bintel
Advertisement