Go Back   IceInSpace > Equipment > Software and Computers
Register FAQ Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread
  #1  
Old 04-03-2007, 07:37 PM
ballaratdragons's Avatar
ballaratdragons (Ken)
The 'DRAGON MAN'

ballaratdragons is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: In the Dark at Snake Valley, Victoria
Posts: 14,412
Cartes du Ciel Eyepiece circle question

Does anyone know the FOV (in arc minutes) of the GS 8x50 right-angle finderscope?

I need it to place the correct circle in Cartes du Ciel.

I can't follow the instructions in the Help file coz I don't know what the 'apparent FOV' of anything is.

Thank you

Pic 1 shows where I have to put the value.

Pic 2 is the instructions that I can't follow coz I don't know the AFOV of EP's and finders.
Attached Thumbnails
Click for full-size image (cdc ep list.jpg)
39.9 KB26 views
Click for full-size image (cdc help file.jpg)
80.7 KB24 views
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 04-03-2007, 08:47 PM
bojan's Avatar
bojan
amateur

bojan is offline
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Mt Waverley, VIC
Posts: 7,112
This can be calculated by multiplying the actual FOV with magnification.
8X50 is usually 10 degrees, so apparent FOV is 40 degrees, 2400.
B
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 04-03-2007, 09:14 PM
ballaratdragons's Avatar
ballaratdragons (Ken)
The 'DRAGON MAN'

ballaratdragons is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: In the Dark at Snake Valley, Victoria
Posts: 14,412
Thanks B,

but 2400 can't be right.

I set 2400 into CDC and the circle encompassed LMC, SMC and Acrux! My 8x50 finder doesn't have a FOV that huge.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 04-03-2007, 09:19 PM
sheeny's Avatar
sheeny (Al)
Spam Hunter

sheeny is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Oberon NSW
Posts: 14,438
My 7x50 Pentax binos have a field of view of 7.1 deg, so I would expect the 8x50 finder to be similar or a bit smaller... perhaps.

Al.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 04-03-2007, 09:44 PM
bojan's Avatar
bojan
amateur

bojan is offline
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Mt Waverley, VIC
Posts: 7,112
Actually you are right :-)
Enter just 7.1*60 = 426 arcmins
Sorry.. I was confused this with Apparent Field of View :-)
When I checked in CdC, it is just FOV (that is not apparent, but real field of view).
Bojan
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 04-03-2007, 09:57 PM
ballaratdragons's Avatar
ballaratdragons (Ken)
The 'DRAGON MAN'

ballaratdragons is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: In the Dark at Snake Valley, Victoria
Posts: 14,412
Thanks guys, I'll try 426
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 04-03-2007, 09:58 PM
Starkler's Avatar
Starkler (Geoff)
4000 post club member

Starkler is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 4,900
Easiest way Ken is to measure it with stars that you can just fit in the fov .
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 04-03-2007, 09:58 PM
middy's Avatar
middy
Registered User

middy is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Brisbane
Posts: 660
Hi Ken,

If it's any help I have a 9 x 50 finder and I use a value of 280.
Attached Thumbnails
Click for full-size image (Eyepiece.jpg)
28.4 KB20 views
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 04-03-2007, 10:01 PM
ballaratdragons's Avatar
ballaratdragons (Ken)
The 'DRAGON MAN'

ballaratdragons is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: In the Dark at Snake Valley, Victoria
Posts: 14,412
ahhh, yep, 426 looks about right

Just about matches my Finderscope view of Octans & SCP.

Thanks Al, Bojan, Geoff & Andrew
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 04-03-2007, 10:10 PM
ballaratdragons's Avatar
ballaratdragons (Ken)
The 'DRAGON MAN'

ballaratdragons is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: In the Dark at Snake Valley, Victoria
Posts: 14,412
Actually, Geoff came up with an easy solution. Just check what stars are in my FOV, then I will make the circle match.

Cloud has just rolled in so I will give it a go as soon as they move away again.

Thanks Geoff
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 04-03-2007, 10:43 PM
ballaratdragons's Avatar
ballaratdragons (Ken)
The 'DRAGON MAN'

ballaratdragons is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: In the Dark at Snake Valley, Victoria
Posts: 14,412
While I have been waiting for the clouds to clear I browsed the net for 8x50 FOV statistics.

They are all different!!! By googling I was given figures of 345, 336, 252, 420 etc.

EVERY site I went to had a different FOV figure for the same right-angled GS 8x50 finder!

Definately makes Geoffs idea the best way. Once I get the stars in the FOV in my finder I will do a drawing of it, compare in CDC, then I will know what my finders FOV is!

Sheeesh, and I thought this had a simple stock-standard answer.
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 05-03-2007, 03:09 AM
Gargoyle_Steve's Avatar
Gargoyle_Steve (Steve)
Space Explorer

Gargoyle_Steve is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Caloundra, Sunshine Coast, Australia
Posts: 1,571
Ken I have a GSO 8x50 RA finder (which hasn't been used for a while) but from memory it's FOV is almost exactly the distance between Alpha and Gamma Crucis, which should be an easy and readily checkable angular distance in CDC, etc.
For newbies (like myself a few months ago) that's the top and bottom stars of the Souther Cross "kite".

My finder either just barely fits both of these stars in at once, or just barely doesn't ... I'll check for you tomorrow night (locked away inside at work now until 7am, can't get to the sky - or finder - right now).
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 05-03-2007, 05:37 PM
ballaratdragons's Avatar
ballaratdragons (Ken)
The 'DRAGON MAN'

ballaratdragons is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: In the Dark at Snake Valley, Victoria
Posts: 14,412
Thanks Steve, the Crux is what I intend to use as my measuring stick

Hopefully I will get to see sky tonight to do it.
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 06-03-2007, 08:53 PM
ballaratdragons's Avatar
ballaratdragons (Ken)
The 'DRAGON MAN'

ballaratdragons is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: In the Dark at Snake Valley, Victoria
Posts: 14,412
OK, I have just placed the Crux in my GS Rightangle 8x50 finder. Gacrux and Acrux lay just on the perphery.

I placed that size circle into CDC to exactly match my view and the FOV of the ring in CDC is '350'.

Thanks Geoff
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 06-03-2007, 11:45 PM
erick's Avatar
erick (Eric)
Starcatcher

erick is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Gerringong
Posts: 8,548
Ken, so that's 350 arcminutes? Some 5.8 degrees? Just wanted to be sure as I'm trying to learn more about angular separation etc.
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 07-03-2007, 08:15 AM
Merlin66's Avatar
Merlin66 (Ken)
Registered User

Merlin66 is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Junortoun Vic
Posts: 8,927
field of view

If you look at, or close to, the celestial equator; set a star at the xtreme edge of the field, the time it takes in minutes, without a RA drive, to drift from one edge to the other times 15 will give the field of view in minutes of arc.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +10. The time is now 02:04 PM.

Powered by vBulletin Version 3.8.7 | Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Advertisement
Bintel
Advertisement
Astrophotography Prize
Advertisement