Go Back   IceInSpace > Beginners Start Here > Beginners Astrophotography
Register FAQ Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread
  #1  
Old 06-10-2018, 01:42 PM
casstony
Registered User

casstony is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Warragul, Vic
Posts: 4,494
Images through TV85

I took a few images through the Televue 85 last night to see how it performs compared to other refractors I've used. It's not as good as the NP101 (expected) but IMO it's better than the Tak FC100d for OSC imaging.

I get the impression that the FC100 is better corrected towards blue but colours look washed out (especially red) while the TV85 is better corrected towards red but there are slight violet halos on bright stars.

NGC 253 is only 26 minutes as my battery went flat; Tuc 47, M27, M8 are one hour (30x2 min).
TV85, WO reducer, IDAS P2, D5600

I'm still just mucking around (and having fun) with imaging but I plan to get a bit more serious from now and try to use longer focal lengths and more time on those smaller targets.
Attached Thumbnails
Click for full-size image (TV85 M8 20%.jpg)
170.8 KB137 views
Click for full-size image (Tucanae 47 jpg - Copy.jpg)
194.9 KB127 views
Click for full-size image (Dumbell jpg - Copy.jpg)
117.4 KB123 views
Click for full-size image (ngc253 - Copy.jpg)
173.1 KB125 views
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 06-10-2018, 01:57 PM
Atmos's Avatar
Atmos (Colin)
Ultimate Noob

Atmos is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 7,013
It’s doing well for a doublet! Never seen a TV85 up close but they’re very light and portable from what I hear.
Did you any corrector with the TV85 or FC100DL?

I am curious as to whether a matched corrector for either of them would both flatten the field and increase colour correction? Similar to what Borg does with their doublets.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 06-10-2018, 02:22 PM
casstony
Registered User

casstony is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Warragul, Vic
Posts: 4,494
I used the William Optics 0.8x Flat6A II flattener/reducer on both the TV85 and the FC100dc. Neither scope is as good as a triplet but they're not bad. You might have a point there Colin about the manufacturers correctors - potentially they could build in some colour adjustment.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 07-10-2018, 08:08 AM
xelasnave's Avatar
xelasnave
Gravity does not Suck

xelasnave is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Tabulam
Posts: 17,003
All wonderful images Tony.
I am surprised really ... A 80mm doublet is the way to get into astrophotography I recon.
Alex
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 07-10-2018, 12:44 PM
azkaz (Aaron)
Registered User

azkaz is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2016
Location: COLLEGE VIEW
Posts: 34
Looks amazing! Looking for at an 80ED myself.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 07-10-2018, 01:51 PM
casstony
Registered User

casstony is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Warragul, Vic
Posts: 4,494
Thanks Alex and Aaron. The images look a lot better when they're not squeezed down to 200kb too; I wish we could have a 500kb limit like CN, makes a big difference.

Under 600mm focal length and faster than f/6 definitely makes things easier for us beginners.

I was out last night with the NP101 but failed to focus carefully enough so those images are in the bin. Every now and then things are going so smoothly I get blasé and make a mistake
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +10. The time is now 03:21 AM.

Powered by vBulletin Version 3.8.7 | Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Advertisement
Bintel
Advertisement