Go Back   IceInSpace > Images > Deep Space
Register FAQ Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread
  #1  
Old 15-04-2005, 03:22 PM
xrekcor
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Jewel Box 14/0405

I got about 10 exposures in before the clouds got me

Dont have the settings, sorry

Saxon 8" f/6 Newt on a EQ5
Meade LPI
Attached Thumbnails
Click for full-size image (jewelbox_sm.jpg)
54.5 KB142 views

Last edited by xrekcor; 15-04-2005 at 03:35 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 15-04-2005, 03:49 PM
ving's Avatar
ving (David)
~Dust bunny breeder~

ving is offline
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: The town of campbells
Posts: 12,359
how long were the exposures and what iso. looks very pretty
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 15-04-2005, 04:09 PM
xrekcor
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Ving,

Unfortunately I didn't write it down, sorry about that. But I do remember something like a 4 or a 5.7 second exposure time.
Sorry not much help.

regards
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 15-04-2005, 04:25 PM
ving's Avatar
ving (David)
~Dust bunny breeder~

ving is offline
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: The town of campbells
Posts: 12,359
gunna have to get me a lpi or toucam one day
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 15-04-2005, 05:36 PM
atalas's Avatar
atalas
Registered User

atalas is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Sydney
Posts: 5,149
Nice shot Rob !yeah it gets like that sometimes,you forget to record the details.

Louie
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 15-04-2005, 07:22 PM
iceman's Avatar
iceman (Mike)
Sir Post a Lot!

iceman is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Gosford, NSW, Australia
Posts: 36,799
That's really nice.

Ving (or other 8" dob owners) you should look at getting an EQ5, they're not that expensive and you can produce results like Rob, with the LPI or ToUcam.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 15-04-2005, 07:46 PM
ving's Avatar
ving (David)
~Dust bunny breeder~

ving is offline
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: The town of campbells
Posts: 12,359
cool! buy me one

I have thought about it mike, and one day I may go down that road. how does something like that go with portability?
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 15-04-2005, 09:50 PM
Astroman's Avatar
Astroman (Andrew Wall)
<><><><>

Astroman is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Paralowie, South Australia
Posts: 4,367
I was thinking of the EQ5, but am saving (well trying) for the EQ6. If I were to go the EQ5 I would have to change tubes to lighten the load a little. I amy look into the HEQ5 as an option though.

Brilliant images by the way. Focus looks spot on.

Last edited by Astroman; 15-04-2005 at 09:54 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 15-04-2005, 10:51 PM
xrekcor
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Andrew,

I wouldn't put a bigger than my 8" f/6 scope on an EQ5 mount
for imaging. Even a 10" for visual would be annoying if you were in the slightest of breezes. Sometimes I have that problem with my 8" on it's EQ5 mount. I'd go for the EQ6, a friend has one and it tracks beautifully with his C9 on it. I ordered my EQ5 with the tube legs although they are better much more rigid than the box alloy models, the tubing is still a lil thin in wall thickness and diameter. I'm going to look into making up a wooden set up out of good old aussie hardwood, should be as solid as an All Black front row

Regards
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 16-04-2005, 11:45 PM
xrekcor
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Louie,

I find I have too much going on to write down or even to remember to write down the settings. I guess some folks like to see them. I'm not sure how it helps as I find they are never exactly the same every time. Although I do feel Meade could do with a few lessons in the "Writting Manuals Dept" at least let people know what the tools can do for you and how the settings changes the camera, ie: a couple of quick examples

regards
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 17-04-2005, 06:31 AM
atalas's Avatar
atalas
Registered User

atalas is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Sydney
Posts: 5,149
Hi Rob, yep your right there ,the records we keep of the settings we used on our image will help the guy doing the imaging more than anybody ells .Lets us know what we did right that night .

Louie
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 17-04-2005, 09:04 AM
h0ughy's Avatar
h0ughy (David)
Moderator

h0ughy is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: NEWCASTLE NSW Australia
Posts: 33,366
If you are using WINXP right click on the original image before you edited it and select properties. Then select the summaries tab. You will get all of your settings there. this is an example:
Attached Thumbnails
Click for full-size image (settingexample.jpg)
43.9 KB84 views
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 17-04-2005, 09:48 AM
gbeal
Registered User

gbeal is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: New Zealand
Posts: 4,346
An All Black Front Row huh? Now you are talking.
Here's one from me, taken a few nights ago, but just two exposures through the Mewlon 7" @f9 D100 at ISO1000, and probably about 3 minute exposures. I too was getting the cloud thing.
Gary
Attached Thumbnails
Click for full-size image (jewelbox050412web.jpg)
95.2 KB82 views
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 17-04-2005, 01:10 PM
rowena
Registered User

rowena is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: South East Qld
Posts: 477
I can't use XP to view my summary on my 300D photos for some reason! I use another program called Exif reader. It tells me my ISO, appeture, lens setting and heaps of other info. its 351KB to download.

http://www.takenet.or.jp/~ryuuji/min...fread/english/
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 17-04-2005, 01:24 PM
iceman's Avatar
iceman (Mike)
Sir Post a Lot!

iceman is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Gosford, NSW, Australia
Posts: 36,799
Nice Gary, love the 6 diffraction spikes!
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 17-04-2005, 01:36 PM
beren
Registered User

beren is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 2,810
Ditto.....nice one Garry and Rob with the LPI
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 20-04-2005, 01:24 PM
dhumpie
Planetary neb & glob nut

dhumpie is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Brisbane
Posts: 879
Hey Rob,

That's a brilliant shot. Looks like the LPI is good for things othere than planetary and lunar. And it looks like you are getting better and better at it. Good job!!!!!!

Darren
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 20-04-2005, 05:06 PM
xrekcor
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Gary,

Excellent shot! love the wide FOV shots

Unfortunately my lil canon powershot isn't quite up to doing wide field astro shots... I guess that is something else to pot on the "To Buy List" a decent digital camera.

I have to admit, I support the All Blacks... sheeeezzz must be the Kiwi in me

Quote:
Originally posted by gbeal
An All Black Front Row huh? Now you are talking.
Here's one from me, taken a few nights ago, but just two exposures through the Mewlon 7" @f9 D100 at ISO1000, and probably about 3 minute exposures. I too was getting the cloud thing.
Gary
Regards
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 20-04-2005, 05:11 PM
xrekcor
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Darren,

Thanks for the feedback!!

tend to think the LPI can do star clusters quite well. As long as there is no nebulous cloud and the cluster is bright. It was good to see some of the fainter stars come out I was only expecting the half dozen bright ones.

Anyways thank you for looking I really appreciate it.

Regards
Reply With Quote
  #20  
Old 21-04-2005, 06:18 AM
iceman's Avatar
iceman (Mike)
Sir Post a Lot!

iceman is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Gosford, NSW, Australia
Posts: 36,799
Did you use a longer exposure for the star cluster? The LPI can do up to 16 seconds can't it?
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +10. The time is now 11:19 PM.

Powered by vBulletin Version 3.8.7 | Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Advertisement
Bintel
Advertisement