Go Back   IceInSpace > General Astronomy > Astronomy and Amateur Science
Register FAQ Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread
  #1  
Old 20-12-2006, 06:31 AM
glenc's Avatar
glenc (Glen)
star-hopper

glenc is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Terranora
Posts: 4,406
The dawn of time - after 13 billion years

The dawn of time - after 13 billion years in the darkroom
Richard Macey December 20, 2006

To a casual observer it could be the psychedelic creation of a mischievous puppy that has dipped its paws in paint. But it may be one of the most extraordinary pictures ever snapped.

It is, scientists said yesterday, the glow from the first things to form in the universe, more than 13 billion years ago. Snapped by NASA's Spitzer space telescope, the bizarre objects must have existed within a few hundred million years of the Big Bang, 13.7 billion years ago.

An Australian astrophysicist, Ray Norris, said the NASA team may have found "the holy grail" of astronomy...

Professor Norris conceded astronomers could not explain how such big objects formed so quickly after the Big Bang. "According to our models, it takes quite a while to build black holes and galaxies," he said.

http://www.smh.com.au/news/science/d...290545385.html
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 20-12-2006, 07:58 AM
Dennis
Dazzled by the Cosmos.

Dennis is offline
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Brisbane
Posts: 11,825
Thanks Glen - interesting research and reading for the Xmas hols!

Cheers

Dennis
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 20-12-2006, 10:34 AM
stephenmcnelley
Registered User

stephenmcnelley is offline
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 427
Everyone gets nostalgic about the olden days...lol

Love the definite statement that the SKA was Australia's.

Glen i will need to retire to properly go through all the interesting things you seem to find!
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 21-12-2006, 04:42 PM
xelasnave's Avatar
xelasnave
Gravity does not Suck

xelasnave is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Tabulam
Posts: 17,003
It is interesting they are finding objects larger than they expected to find working on the assumption that what they have captured is within 300 000 years of the start. I am unclear as to at what point to place this map in relation to inflation is it a before or after shot? an after shot I suspect??? Are objects or "blobs" on this map relatable to a "system" that exsists today.. a childhood shot of some familar current object like the local group for example.
alex
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 21-12-2006, 06:34 PM
Kal's Avatar
Kal (Andrew)
1¼" ñì®våñá

Kal is offline
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Sydney
Posts: 1,845
There is alot of scepticism from many astronomers apparently, who think that what you are seeing is light from objects much closer that wasn'e subtracted.

http://space.newscientist.com/articl...-disputed.html
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +10. The time is now 03:57 AM.

Powered by vBulletin Version 3.8.7 | Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Advertisement
Astrophotography Prize
Advertisement
Bintel
Advertisement