Go Back   IceInSpace > Images > Deep Space
Register FAQ Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread
  #1  
Old 30-06-2017, 12:50 PM
Atmos's Avatar
Atmos (Colin)
Ultimate Noob

Atmos is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 7,013
Samyang 14mm F/2.8 First Light

Picked this up off Gum Tree earlier this week and managed to have a play with it last night. One of my jobs this afternoon is trying to figure out how to take a reasonable flat frame! Ultra Wide Angle and even illumination I think is going to be a bit of a headache. Maybe get some darks tonight to help with some contrast.

Optically... It's soft. However compared to most of the lens' in this range (except the Nikon 14-24mm), they're all pretty soft and have reasonable distortion and other optical aberrations.

Am I happy with it? For the price point it certainly does the job. I think I'll end up using it with my Nikon D700 (it is VERY forgiving on lens') for super wide field. 3.91 micron pixels + no anti-aliasing filter isn't the best lens for a $350 SWA 14mm lens

30x300s with Nikon D7200 & Samyang 14mm F/2.8 @ F/5.6
Attached Thumbnails
Click for full-size image (Milky Way Lightroom IIS.jpg)
191.5 KB137 views
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 30-06-2017, 12:53 PM
strongmanmike's Avatar
strongmanmike (Michael)
Highest Observatory in Oz

strongmanmike is offline
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Canberra
Posts: 17,682
Really nice...but now what do you photograph with it...?

Mike
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 30-06-2017, 01:06 PM
Atmos's Avatar
Atmos (Colin)
Ultimate Noob

Atmos is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 7,013
Quote:
Originally Posted by strongmanmike View Post
Really nice...but now what do you photograph with it...?

Mike
You're looking at it
With an APS-C (my D7200) it gives almost the same FOV as what you get naturally with your eyes so it is crazy wide. This makes it a reasonable landscape lens because it is largely WYSIWYG.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 30-06-2017, 01:43 PM
gregbradley's Avatar
gregbradley
Registered User

gregbradley is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Sydney
Posts: 18,183
That's terrific Milky Way.

I just sent a copy of the Samyang 14mm F2.8 back as it was bad in the corners. unusable bad.

Sigma 14mm F2.8 Art is what I am looking at. Irix 15mm F2.4 also gets good reviews.

Samyang 12mm F2 for APS cameras is quite good.

Greg.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 30-06-2017, 02:22 PM
strongmanmike's Avatar
strongmanmike (Michael)
Highest Observatory in Oz

strongmanmike is offline
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Canberra
Posts: 17,682
Quote:
Originally Posted by Atmos View Post
You're looking at it
With an APS-C (my D7200) it gives almost the same FOV as what you get naturally with your eyes so it is crazy wide. This makes it a reasonable landscape lens because it is largely WYSIWYG.
No, that's what I mean, after this image what is left to photograph? everything is in it, that's it, done

Mike
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 30-06-2017, 02:51 PM
atalas's Avatar
atalas
Registered User

atalas is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Sydney
Posts: 5,151
Love these super wide shot of the MW
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 30-06-2017, 03:32 PM
Atmos's Avatar
Atmos (Colin)
Ultimate Noob

Atmos is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 7,013
Quote:
Originally Posted by gregbradley View Post
That's terrific Milky Way.

I just sent a copy of the Samyang 14mm F2.8 back as it was bad in the corners. unusable bad.

Sigma 14mm F2.8 Art is what I am looking at. Irix 15mm F2.4 also gets good reviews.

Samyang 12mm F2 for APS cameras is quite good.

Greg.
Thanks Greg. The coma isn't great with the lens I've got but it is kinda what I expected after seeing how it performed on Lenstip.com
I'll have to check out those lens' and see how they go. There are a lot of Nikon 14-24mm lens' that pop up though, a lot but then and cannot think of a use for them hehe

Quote:
Originally Posted by strongmanmike View Post
No, that's what I mean, after this image what is left to photograph? everything is in it, that's it, done

Mike
I can go wider! Or I can do a full 360° of the sky! Oh the possibilities!

Quote:
Originally Posted by atalas View Post
Love these super wide shot of the MW
Has me wanting a Nikon 14-24 and borrow a Nikon D810 for some crazy wide field
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 30-06-2017, 10:20 PM
Ryderscope's Avatar
Ryderscope (Rodney)
Registered User

Ryderscope is offline
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Glanmire, NSW
Posts: 2,351
Excellent. Go for the 360d Colin. The opportunities are endless
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 03-07-2017, 09:25 PM
RickS's Avatar
RickS (Rick)
PI cult recruiter

RickS is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Brisbane
Posts: 10,584
Looks great, Colin.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 03-07-2017, 10:52 PM
Decimus's Avatar
Decimus (Richard)
Registered User

Decimus is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: Hobart TAS
Posts: 267
A very striking image for such an affordable lens, Colin! I would be thrilled with a result like this

Cheers,
Richard
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 04-07-2017, 12:37 PM
Atmos's Avatar
Atmos (Colin)
Ultimate Noob

Atmos is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 7,013
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ryderscope View Post
Excellent. Go for the 360d Colin. The opportunities are endless
I am kinda tempted to splash out and get a Nikon 14-24mm as it has considerably better full frame performance and doesn't have some weird distortion. Borrow a D810 and go really wide

Quote:
Originally Posted by RickS View Post
Looks great, Colin.


Quote:
Originally Posted by Decimus View Post
A very striking image for such an affordable lens, Colin! I would be thrilled with a result like this

Cheers,
Richard
The individual 300s subs have really messy stars but they're good in the stack. Quite happy with the performance of the lens given it's price and shortness.
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 04-07-2017, 04:16 PM
Slawomir's Avatar
Slawomir (Suavi)
Registered User

Slawomir is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: North Queensland
Posts: 3,240
I think the image looks great Colin. One day I will certainly investigate this aspect of astro imaging.
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 04-07-2017, 05:40 PM
Atmos's Avatar
Atmos (Colin)
Ultimate Noob

Atmos is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 7,013
Quote:
Originally Posted by Slawomir View Post
I think the image looks great Colin. One day I will certainly investigate this aspect of astro imaging.
It is easy in that you don't even need a tracking mount. Just a tripod and 30s exposures will do fine as long as you manually revenges every so often
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 06-07-2017, 09:56 AM
topheart
Registered User

topheart is offline
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Cairns
Posts: 1,087
That is very nice Colin!
Fantastic for the price!
Cheers,
Tim
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 06-07-2017, 10:16 AM
Atmos's Avatar
Atmos (Colin)
Ultimate Noob

Atmos is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 7,013
Quote:
Originally Posted by topheart View Post
That is very nice Colin!
Fantastic for the price!
Cheers,
Tim
If you're not pixel peeping then there is no real difference between this lens and one 3x the price (Nikon 14-24)
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 06-07-2017, 05:09 PM
codemonkey's Avatar
codemonkey (Lee)
Lee "Wormsy" Borsboom

codemonkey is offline
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Kilcoy, QLD
Posts: 2,058
Beautiful shot, Colin, very well processed.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +10. The time is now 03:46 AM.

Powered by vBulletin Version 3.8.7 | Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Advertisement
Bintel
Advertisement