Go Back   IceInSpace > Images > Deep Space
Register FAQ Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Rating: Thread Rating: 3 votes, 2.67 average.
  #1  
Old 27-05-2017, 10:16 AM
codemonkey's Avatar
codemonkey (Lee)
Lee "Wormsy" Borsboom

codemonkey is offline
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Kilcoy, QLD
Posts: 2,058
M83

Had another crack at M83 this year. I spent a bit over 10hrs gross on this, and netted about 6hrs of data. I was shooting mere 35s exposures at high gain (250) for all LRGB filters to try and optimize resolution. The problem with that is with SGP and my imaging computer, the overhead between downloading frames, settling and filter changes it about 17-18s, so I lost a *heap* of imaging time doing it that way.

On the bright side, I got some of the sharpest broadband subs I've gotten, with some G frames down to 1.6" The resulting super luminance had a median FWHM of 2.17" in the central 1000px of the frame (flattener spacing isn't *quite* perfect, so I tend to focus on the middle :p)

Not sure about the processing on this one. Optimised for the stars and thus compromised some other aspects of the image. May re-do it yet...

Bigger, higher quality version on Astrobin here.

Edit: Replaced image with re-processed version.
Attached Thumbnails
Click for full-size image (v2_sml.jpg)
194.2 KB113 views

Last edited by codemonkey; 28-05-2017 at 09:00 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 27-05-2017, 10:41 AM
Atmos's Avatar
Atmos (Colin)
Ultimate Noob

Atmos is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 7,013
Exceptional job for a sub 5" scope Lee! The resolution is fantastic!
Out of curiosity, how often were you changing filters?

I must say that settling time is the absolute biggest improvement that I get upgrading from the EQ6. The EQ6 would sometimes settle nicely in 5s, sometimes 30s+!
I don't even have one anymore Due to the theoretical smoothness of your guide graph, your Linear should be significantly better than your EQ6 was in that regard too
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 27-05-2017, 11:19 AM
atalas's Avatar
atalas
Registered User

atalas is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Sydney
Posts: 5,151
Very nice result Lee
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 27-05-2017, 12:45 PM
glend (Glen)
Registered User

glend is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: Lake Macquarie
Posts: 7,121
Great Lee, nice central detail coming through.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 27-05-2017, 01:35 PM
cometcatcher's Avatar
cometcatcher (Kevin)
<--- Comet Hale-Bopp

cometcatcher is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Cloudy Mackay
Posts: 6,542
Very sharp Lee. 35 sec subs hey..... Well you've just given me all sorts of ideas now with astro cams.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 27-05-2017, 05:54 PM
codemonkey's Avatar
codemonkey (Lee)
Lee "Wormsy" Borsboom

codemonkey is offline
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Kilcoy, QLD
Posts: 2,058
Quote:
Originally Posted by Atmos View Post
Exceptional job for a sub 5" scope Lee! The resolution is fantastic!
Out of curiosity, how often were you changing filters?

I must say that settling time is the absolute biggest improvement that I get upgrading from the EQ6. The EQ6 would sometimes settle nicely in 5s, sometimes 30s+!
I don't even have one anymore Due to the theoretical smoothness of your guide graph, your Linear should be significantly better than your EQ6 was in that regard too
Thanks Colin :-) In order to try and balance out overhead whilst overcoming FPN, I was running LLLLRGB<dither>. I could have run multiple RGB but that would have come at the cost of less luminance and wouldn't have decreased the overhead that significantly.

Settling isn't *too* bad, usually a couple of seconds between frames. To be honest I only want to settle when dithering, but that's not an option as far as I can discern. Currently I settle at < 1px for 2s which means guaranteed 2s overhead every frame. After dithering it can take a bit longer to settle (I use extreme dithering x2).

Quote:
Originally Posted by atalas View Post
Very nice result Lee
Thanks Louie :-)

Quote:
Originally Posted by glend View Post
Great Lee, nice central detail coming through.
Thanks Glen :-)

Quote:
Originally Posted by cometcatcher View Post
Very sharp Lee. 35 sec subs hey..... Well you've just given me all sorts of ideas now with astro cams.
Thanks Kevin :-) Short subs can work well but you need a camera with low read noise. I wouldn't try this with an 8300 for example, but with the new low read noise CMOS chips it becomes an option. Of course you don't really *need* one of those cameras, but it hurts your integration a lot less with them than with traditional higher read noise CCDs.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 27-05-2017, 08:30 PM
cometcatcher's Avatar
cometcatcher (Kevin)
<--- Comet Hale-Bopp

cometcatcher is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Cloudy Mackay
Posts: 6,542
Quote:
Originally Posted by codemonkey View Post
....Short subs can work well but you need a camera with low read noise. I wouldn't try this with an 8300 for example, but with the new low read noise CMOS chips it becomes an option. Of course you don't really *need* one of those cameras, but it hurts your integration a lot less with them than with traditional higher read noise CCDs.
Thanks Lee. That is a VERY useful piece of information that I was looking for. The ZWO CMOS cams are in my sights. Don't know which one yet exactly but I'll decide when Bill stops sending me letters.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 27-05-2017, 08:35 PM
topheart
Registered User

topheart is offline
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Cairns
Posts: 1,087
Very very nice...lovely colour!! Sharp!
Cheers,
Tim
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 27-05-2017, 10:50 PM
traveller's Avatar
traveller (Bo)
Not enough time and money

traveller is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 2,133
Very nicely resolved Lee.
Great job.
Bo
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 28-05-2017, 09:03 AM
codemonkey's Avatar
codemonkey (Lee)
Lee "Wormsy" Borsboom

codemonkey is offline
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Kilcoy, QLD
Posts: 2,058
Quote:
Originally Posted by cometcatcher View Post
Thanks Lee. That is a VERY useful piece of information that I was looking for. The ZWO CMOS cams are in my sights. Don't know which one yet exactly but I'll decide when Bill stops sending me letters.
No worries Kevin, glad I could help. That Bill's a right ol' prick! It's hard to beat the ASI 1600 in this price range.

Quote:
Originally Posted by topheart View Post
Very very nice...lovely colour!! Sharp!
Cheers,
Tim
Thanks Tim :-)

Quote:
Originally Posted by traveller View Post
Very nicely resolved Lee.
Great job.
Bo
Thanks Bo :-)

I've uploaded a reprocessed version, which I'm happier with. Stars aren't as nice, but the target is better. Pretty sure I'm going to get a visit from Mike soon though, muttering something about worms... ;-)
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 28-05-2017, 09:57 AM
alpal's Avatar
alpal
Registered User

alpal is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 3,780
Hi Lee,
great work - one of the sharpest M83's ever posted.
That ASI camera is really performing well for you
& enables the shorter frames to be stacked well.
The low read noise of 1.2e @30db gain is making a difference.
You also had superb guiding & a low FWHM.

cheers
Allan
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 28-05-2017, 11:05 AM
cometcatcher's Avatar
cometcatcher (Kevin)
<--- Comet Hale-Bopp

cometcatcher is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Cloudy Mackay
Posts: 6,542
That's even nicer.
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 28-05-2017, 03:55 PM
RickS's Avatar
RickS (Rick)
PI cult recruiter

RickS is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Brisbane
Posts: 10,584
Very nice, Lee! The detail is great. That's definitely an advantage of a low read noise camera and short subs. I would have gone for a less cyan look and fixed the pink stars but not everybody agrees with my sense of colour (especially my wife...)
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 28-05-2017, 04:11 PM
codemonkey's Avatar
codemonkey (Lee)
Lee "Wormsy" Borsboom

codemonkey is offline
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Kilcoy, QLD
Posts: 2,058
Quote:
Originally Posted by alpal View Post
Hi Lee,
great work - one of the sharpest M83's ever posted.
That ASI camera is really performing well for you
& enables the shorter frames to be stacked well.
The low read noise of 1.2e @30db gain is making a difference.
You also had superb guiding & a low FWHM.

cheers
Allan
Thanks very much Allan, I'm pretty pleased with the resolution given a 5" scope in Australian skies :-)

Quote:
Originally Posted by cometcatcher View Post
That's even nicer.
Thanks Kevin! :-)

Quote:
Originally Posted by RickS View Post
Very nice, Lee! The detail is great. That's definitely an advantage of a low read noise camera and short subs. I would have gone for a less cyan look and fixed the pink stars but not everybody agrees with my sense of colour (especially my wife...)
Thanks Rick :-) Funny you should say that, I just had it open in Photoshop and was thinking it looked a little too cyan. I think pink stars is due to some bloating in the blue channel and me being too lazy to reduce the stars to compensate.

I'm thinking I may actually get a bunch more data (skies/weather permitting), perhaps switching back to more traditional exposure lengths, at which point I'll reprocess and probably tweak the colour some.

If I had an infinite amount of spare time I'd like to write some software that minimizes the overhead for this kind of capture, but right now it's pretty nuts to try and go deep whilst throwing away ~40% of your imaging time.
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 28-05-2017, 06:04 PM
Slawomir's Avatar
Slawomir (Suavi)
Registered User

Slawomir is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: North Queensland
Posts: 3,240
I love it! So many little galaxies in the background!

It would be awesome to add more data and thus give a bit more contrast to those tiny smudges and fuzzies. Cannot see anything wrong with flattener spacing either.

Top image Lee
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 28-05-2017, 06:54 PM
Placidus (Mike and Trish)
Narrowing the band

Placidus is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Euchareena, NSW
Posts: 3,719
Heartfelt congratulations. That is extraordinary. Both beautiful, and amazing technically.
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 28-05-2017, 09:59 PM
marc4darkskies's Avatar
marc4darkskies (Marcus)
Billions and Billions ...

marc4darkskies is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Quialigo, NSW
Posts: 3,143
That really is a very nice result Lee. Nice work!

If it were mine though I'd tone down the HII regions a little bit.
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 29-05-2017, 12:28 PM
strongmanmike's Avatar
strongmanmike (Michael)
Highest Observatory in Oz

strongmanmike is offline
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Canberra
Posts: 17,650
A really beautiful M83 Lee, I like it just the way it is, a joy to view

Mike
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 29-05-2017, 07:57 PM
Camelopardalis's Avatar
Camelopardalis (Dunk)
Drifting from the pole

Camelopardalis is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Brisbane
Posts: 5,466
That's smashing Lee and check out the spiral in the bottom right corner

Were you refocusing for blue?
Reply With Quote
  #20  
Old 30-05-2017, 08:03 AM
RobC (Rob)
Registered User

RobC is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Woodford , Queensland , Australia
Posts: 219
Spot on Lee. Congratulations. I am moving to Woodford this week. My first acquisition after 18 months in the Astro doldrums will be a ZWO camera .

Cheers

Rob
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +10. The time is now 09:45 PM.

Powered by vBulletin Version 3.8.7 | Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Advertisement
Bintel
Advertisement