Go Back   IceInSpace > Equipment > Equipment Discussions
Register FAQ Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread
  #1  
Old 28-02-2017, 05:32 PM
Ricky (Ricky)
Registered User

Ricky is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2017
Location: Australia.. N.S.W. Central Coast
Posts: 4
Any advice?

Hi all.
I have a celestron cpc 1100 & im looking at buying some nice eyepieces.
( Teleview ) I have been told that because of my size of scope I don't need big FOV.. is this true ? I would like to view planets & deep space objects.
Any help or suggestions would be muchly appreciated..
I don't have a huge budget & would like to cover some good distances with 3 eyepieces if possible.. Thanks

Last edited by Ricky; 28-02-2017 at 05:36 PM. Reason: Adding more to my question
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 01-03-2017, 08:37 AM
Allan_L's Avatar
Allan_L (Allan)
Member > 10year club

Allan_L is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Central Coast NSW
Posts: 3,339
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ricky View Post
Hi all.
I have a celestron cpc 1100 & im looking at buying some nice eyepieces.
( Teleview ) I have been told that because of my size of scope I don't need big FOV.. is this true ? I would like to view planets & deep space objects.
Any help or suggestions would be muchly appreciated..
I don't have a huge budget & would like to cover some good distances with 3 eyepieces if possible.. Thanks
Hi Ricky,
Welcome to IceInSpace
I see you are local to me!

I had a CPC1100 for a few years myself, and it was a nice scope which provided good views.
It is an f/10.
So the strongest magnification you could use would (theoretically) be a 5mm eyepiece.
That would give 560x magnification.
Atmospherics and seeing conditions would rarely be good enough to support that high a magnification. Giving you a very large but blurry blob.

I am pretty sure the eyepiece I used for planetary was a TV Nagler 9mm.
Giving magnification of just over 300x. Even for this, the seeing needed to be good to see datails on Saturn and Jupiter (the only two planets that can show much in the way of detail for that aperture). So you can pick out Mercury Mars Neptune and Uranus, but they are just small disks displaying a small degree of colour. (Sure, Mars occasionally is close enough to spot ice caps and some markings, but is often a disappointment most of the time).

You want to see planets and DSO. But unfortunately they are opposites.
Most DSO's are big, and require less magnification and more wide angle.
They are also generally "faint fuzzies" and therefore an eyepiece that enhances contrast are desirable. With my CPC1100, I found my best DSO eyepiece to be a Televue Panoptic 27mm.

From memory the two previously mentioned eyepieces were recommendations from the knowledgeable staff at Bintel. The third eyepiece they recommended as middle ground was the Televue Nagler 16mm.

That cost me well over $1,000 that day. But these eyepieces have stuck with me and are still my goto eyepieces of quality. Although subsequent Ethos eyepieces I have borrowed were very impressive in that rig.

Hope that helps?

You are welcome to come over and try some of my eyepieces (some as listed in my signature). I also have a 5.2mm ED that you might like to try, just for reference.

Regards
Allan
(PM me for my address etc if you want to meet up)
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 01-03-2017, 09:04 AM
Camelopardalis's Avatar
Camelopardalis (Dunk)
Drifting from the pole

Camelopardalis is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Brisbane
Posts: 5,466
Great response from Allan

The CPC1100 will tolerate a lot of eyepieces, and you don't need a huge budget for it. Trying is always good, before you plump your hard earned down.

As Allan says, unless you regularly get excellent conditions where you observe from, stick to around 9/10/11mm for maximum magnification. I'd suggest a mid-range around 18-24mm for globs and other objects of similar size, and then for DSO...it depends where you view from. I use a 30mm and a 40mm from a dark site, but if you observe from suburbia then the 30mm will likely serve you better (with 40 may show you too much sky glow).
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 01-03-2017, 09:35 AM
Merlin66's Avatar
Merlin66 (Ken)
Registered User

Merlin66 is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Junortoun Vic
Posts: 8,927
Dunk's reply says it all!
Remember that the C11 at f10 is pretty forgiving regards the type of eyepiece being used; far less critical than if you're using a f4 system!
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 02-03-2017, 01:59 PM
Ricky (Ricky)
Registered User

Ricky is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2017
Location: Australia.. N.S.W. Central Coast
Posts: 4
Many thanks

Hi Allan . Thanks so much for yr advice. & would like to take u up on yr offer of caching up sometime. I'm really keen to get better at astronomy & I think the more people I know interested in the hobby the better I can do.. Thanks again.
Ricky
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 02-03-2017, 02:04 PM
Ricky (Ricky)
Registered User

Ricky is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2017
Location: Australia.. N.S.W. Central Coast
Posts: 4
Thanks all

To all that replied I thank u very much for taking time to help me out.. Cheers.😁
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +10. The time is now 08:04 AM.

Powered by vBulletin Version 3.8.7 | Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Advertisement
Bintel
Advertisement