Go Back   IceInSpace > Equipment > Software and Computers
Register FAQ Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread
  #1  
Old 15-10-2016, 07:04 AM
leon's Avatar
leon
Registered User

leon is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Warrnambool
Posts: 12,812
Cloning my Hard Drive

Good Morning to all,
Seeing the disaster i had with my PC, which however is now performing very well, I intend to Clone the Hard Drive.

Could anyone please suggest a good cloning tool/software.

Thank You in Advance.

Leon
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 15-10-2016, 08:09 AM
multiweb's Avatar
multiweb (Marc)
ze frogginator

multiweb is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Sydney
Posts: 22,080
Quote:
Originally Posted by leon View Post
Good Morning to all,
Seeing the disaster i had with my PC, which however is now performing very well, I intend to Clone the Hard Drive.

Could anyone please suggest a good cloning tool/software.

Thank You in Advance.

Leon
Hi Leon, Acronis true image is very good. You have to realise that cloning or imaging a drive is different from backing up files.

Cloning will restore the disk signature, the MBR and any partitions from drive to drive. So you can take a cloned drive, replace it in your machine and boot. Your OS settings, everything is identical. It is the fastest and safest way to back up your data and OS.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 15-10-2016, 08:40 AM
silv's Avatar
silv (Annette)
Registered User

silv is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Germany 54°N
Posts: 1,110
I remember Acronis from the olden days. Good memories.
But no current knowledge about cloning Windows.
I felt I should explain why I'm not going to chip in on this new thread.
I'm not being obnoxious. I just don't know an answer
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 15-10-2016, 08:53 AM
leon's Avatar
leon
Registered User

leon is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Warrnambool
Posts: 12,812
Thanks indeed, yes Marc i do realise what you are saying, I want to do this so I don't have to go through what just happened to my PC.
Although I got it right and it is running very well I just need some decent back up in case it dies in the future.
I did actually look at that product, but really didn't know much about it hence the question.

Leon

Thank you
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 15-10-2016, 09:08 AM
multiweb's Avatar
multiweb (Marc)
ze frogginator

multiweb is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Sydney
Posts: 22,080
Quote:
Originally Posted by leon View Post
Thanks indeed, yes Marc i do realise what you are saying, I want to do this so I don't have to go through what just happened to my PC.
Although I got it right and it is running very well I just need some decent back up in case it dies in the future.
I did actually look at that product, but really didn't know much about it hence the question.

Leon

Thank you
Hi leon, there are two types of situations

1_ one day your computer doesn't start at all.

2_ you've lost or deleted some files or photos by mistake or they are corrupted.

#2 happens but it's not a show stopper. Easily remedied by duplicating files on external drives or burn them on bluray disks.

#1 is the killer. In this case what matters most is how fast you can get back to a working computer in the exact same state (or close) as it was just before it crashed.

If you have a clone or image you can get back in business from a new empty unformatted drive in around 15-20min. The alternative is reinstalling all of your operating system then programs one by one then your files. That can take days.

The routine I use with acronis is to back up my boot drive (and others) every two weeks or when I feel the change warrants a backup. The longer you wait the bigger the difference.

The first backup is called a seed. It's a full back up. It can take 1h or more. The subsequent backups are called differential backups and they are small files that take only 5 or 10min to do. They contain the difference between the full backup and what your PC state is at when you do the differential back up.

To restore your machine you need 1xfull backup + 1xlatest differential backup you've done, and that's all.

The other system is called incremental backup. It is used because it can be faster. It saves small files again from the time you've done a full backup but each subsequent incremental back up depends on the previous incremental backup. So to restore your machine you need the full back up, then all the incremental backups you've done to get your PC back. If one of the incremental backups is corrupted in the chain of files then you're stuck again as they all rely on each other.

This is why I recommend differential backups. Only two points of failure. The seed and your latest differential backup.
When you do backups validate them. There is nothing worse than trying to restore your PC and be prompted that your backup is corrupted.

Hope this heps.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 15-10-2016, 09:52 AM
rally
Registered User

rally is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Australia
Posts: 896
Marc, as a system - differential and incremental backing up makes sense, but I think for Leon, Cloning is a good way to go.
Its a very simple thing to do and its even simpler to get back up and running.
Ghosting is also a good idea.
It doesnt take long and he will always be able to start from scratch
Nothing worse than getting all your incremental backup versions mixed up
At some point in the future you always need to do a new seed and in the event of a total failure you often dont have your tools or anything to start with (the PC is down) - so getting started can be a Catch22, although that can be the case with anything - but swapping out a cloned HDD should mean you are up and running in the time it takes to install the replacement hard drive.

Leon, Id buy yourself one of the external HDD drive adapters I put the link in your previous thread.
If you can try and buy the identical drive that is already in your PC, it actually isnt critical, but it does make life easier.

This way you just plug in a new OEM hard drive straight out of the packet, clone it and put it back in its packet (appropriately labelled of course)
Maybe have two of them and alternate backups every so often.

Getting a Time Capsule or some other sort of automated file backup system might also be worthwhile - just select all the data or folders you want to backup
The disadvantage is that if you rely on all the applications saving files to their favourite places - then you have data scattered all over the place, whereas if you name a new folder Data and then created some subfolders for each type of Data file you are likely to use and then backing up Data is simply a case of saving "Data" with subfolders.
But it requires diligence to and a few changes to default file settings to make this work best.

Happy to lisetn to other peoples ideas but this keeps it (relatively) simple, especially the recovery side of things.

Rally

PS Stating the obvious here :
But . . . a caveat and Warning anyway
Cloning, copies a drives entire disc contents (effectively sector by sector) to another drive - if you accidentally mix up the source and destination then you will destroy your data drive forever !
Be very slow and very careful when selecting which drive is which in the software - keep you finger off the keyboard until you are sure you know what you are doing !!!
In this regard cloning is not fool proof !
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 15-10-2016, 10:00 AM
multiweb's Avatar
multiweb (Marc)
ze frogginator

multiweb is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Sydney
Posts: 22,080
Quote:
Originally Posted by rally View Post
but I think for Leon, Cloning is a good way to go.
Its a very simple thing to do and its even simpler to get back up and running.
Ghosting is also a good idea.

- but swapping out a cloned HDD should mean you are up and running in the time it takes to install the replacement hard drive.
Agreed.

I was more thinking on the line that my PC software is always updated and changing so need to keep up with backups. Also forgot to mention that eventually you have to make a new seed which I do probably every 3 months or so.

In Leon's case, if the PC doesn't change dramatically you're right. A clone is the way to go.

Leon, I second the external base. You need to be in a position to plug your backup in your PC and boot from a CD in most cases or USB stick to restore a drive. I skipped that bit and took it for granted as I do it all the time.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 15-10-2016, 10:49 AM
leon's Avatar
leon
Registered User

leon is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Warrnambool
Posts: 12,812
Well you guys are really on the ball, I do understand the workings of computers and file back up etc, but that is probably as far as it goes.

I just need a simple peace of mind back up, so if the PC goes belly up for any reason it can still have all my filers and programs and everything that makes a PC work.

So I reckon as suggested a simple clone of the hard Drive is what would work for me.

This machine that i use, is pretty much dedicated to Photography with a few Photo programs and all my 140,00 images , and an occasional look at IIS, so as you can see it just needs to be simple so that i can get back to Photography, as this is what i do.

I appreciate your responses and your suggestions, thank you very much.

Leon

PS I do have all these photos and general files backed to an external HD already so if it died they would not be lost.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 15-10-2016, 01:53 PM
multiweb's Avatar
multiweb (Marc)
ze frogginator

multiweb is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Sydney
Posts: 22,080
Quote:
Originally Posted by leon View Post
So I reckon as suggested a simple clone of the hard Drive is what would work for me.
Yes. You make an exact copy of your HD then keep it as a spare. In case of failure you swap the drives. Same disc capacity or slightly bigger to hold the partitions, boot and others if needed.

What I proposed previously was a little more involved and probably an overkill. It allows to mirror multiple partitions and compress them on a smaller capacity backup drive.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 15-10-2016, 02:39 PM
Exfso's Avatar
Exfso (Peter)
Registered User

Exfso is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Adelaide
Posts: 1,699
Macrium reflect have both a free and paid version. The free version works very well.
Here is a youtube tutorial which I believe is quite informative..

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=U0PyZIqecII
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 16-10-2016, 10:17 AM
w0mbat (Ian)
Registered User

w0mbat is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: W Tree, Victoria
Posts: 89
Also check out XXClone and Clonezilla. I can vouch for XXClone saving me when a hard drive died. Installed the clone drive and running again in ten minutes.
Both have free versions.
Ian

Last edited by w0mbat; 16-10-2016 at 10:18 AM. Reason: Add text
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 16-10-2016, 03:58 PM
leon's Avatar
leon
Registered User

leon is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Warrnambool
Posts: 12,812
Thank You again for your constant support and suggestions.

Leon
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 16-10-2016, 07:49 PM
hamiland (Anders)
Registered User

hamiland is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2016
Location: Mornington Peninsula, Australia
Posts: 44
Just in case you are unaware, Western Digital and Seagate have free copies of Acronis available to download, the only requirement is that you have one of their drives installed on launch.
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 16-10-2016, 08:39 PM
leon's Avatar
leon
Registered User

leon is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Warrnambool
Posts: 12,812
Thanks Anders, I was not aware of that.

Leon
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 16-10-2016, 09:00 PM
OICURMT's Avatar
OICURMT
Oh, I See You Are Empty!

OICURMT is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Laramie, WY - United States of America
Posts: 1,555
Quote:
Originally Posted by multiweb View Post
#1 is the killer. In this case what matters most is how fast you can get back to a working computer in the exact same state (or close) as it was just before it crashed.

Only way to ensure an exact state duplicate is to use RAID0.
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 16-10-2016, 09:34 PM
leon's Avatar
leon
Registered User

leon is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Warrnambool
Posts: 12,812
Only way to ensure an exact state duplicate is to use RAID0.?

Not quite sure what you mean by RAIDO ?

Thanks, Leon
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 17-10-2016, 08:22 AM
OICURMT's Avatar
OICURMT
Oh, I See You Are Empty!

OICURMT is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Laramie, WY - United States of America
Posts: 1,555
Quote:
Originally Posted by leon View Post
Only way to ensure an exact state duplicate is to use RAID0.?

Not quite sure what you mean by RAIDO ?

Thanks, Leon
Running dual hard drives in parallel which automatically sync to one another in real-time.

It's a redundancy method, not a backup, most often used for NAS (Network attached storage).

Not often you would use RAID on a desktop, but I have in the past when I was doing numerical modelling and needed the redundancy in order to make sure all my generated data did not get lost (days of computational simulation).

OIC!
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 17-10-2016, 11:13 AM
pmrid's Avatar
pmrid (Peter)
Ageing badly.

pmrid is offline
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Cloudy, light-polluted Bribie Is.
Posts: 3,762
Wiring harness? Is there some special piece of kit for making a clone HD or do you install the target drive in your PC as a second drive?
peter
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 17-10-2016, 11:37 AM
multiweb's Avatar
multiweb (Marc)
ze frogginator

multiweb is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Sydney
Posts: 22,080
Quote:
Originally Posted by OICURMT View Post
Running dual hard drives in parallel which automatically sync to one another in real-time.

It's a redundancy method, not a backup, most often used for NAS (Network attached storage).

Not often you would use RAID on a desktop, but I have in the past when I was doing numerical modelling and needed the redundancy in order to make sure all my generated data did not get lost (days of computational simulation).

OIC!
Do you mean RAID1 which is mirrored? RAID0 is an old standard which used to be striped volumes spread over two separate HDs. No redundancy as if one HD failed you lost the lot.
Reply With Quote
  #20  
Old 17-10-2016, 04:38 PM
OICURMT's Avatar
OICURMT
Oh, I See You Are Empty!

OICURMT is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Laramie, WY - United States of America
Posts: 1,555
Quote:
Originally Posted by multiweb View Post
Do you mean RAID1 which is mirrored? RAID0 is an old standard which used to be striped volumes spread over two separate HDs. No redundancy as if one HD failed you lost the lot.

You are correct, I meant RAID1.

Don't know where my head was at...

I'm currently running two sets of RAID1 on my NAS, with a dock that clones each set.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +10. The time is now 12:17 AM.

Powered by vBulletin Version 3.8.7 | Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Advertisement
Bintel
Advertisement
Astrophotography Prize
Advertisement