Go Back   IceInSpace > General Astronomy > Astronomy and Amateur Science
Register FAQ Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread
  #1  
Old 14-11-2006, 07:45 AM
sheeny's Avatar
sheeny (Al)
Spam Hunter

sheeny is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Oberon NSW
Posts: 14,437
Transits lose their Sparkle

I found this in this morning's news @ nature. Seems to have been written before the Mercury Transit.

Al.

Transits lose their sparkle

Mercury's crossing of the Sun leaves most pros unmoved.
Katharine Sanderson

Captain Cook left England's Plymouth harbour in 1768, bound for Tahiti so he could watch Venus pass in front of the Sun. He navigated across uncharted seas, arriving in 1769 to fulfil his mandate — to time the transit and so provide crucial data for calculating the size of the Universe.

Tomorrow, Mercury will transit the Sun; astronomers are dashing to Hawaii to take a good look and make a few measurements. But the information to come out of the transit is unlikely to have the same impact as Cook's data on Venus, if it has any impact at all.

At most, a transit proves that we understand celestial mechanics, says George Fraser, at Leicester University, UK, who will not be watching the transit — although he admits that some scientists would quibble with the assertion.

Fraser is in charge of the Mercury Imaging X-ray Spectrometer on the European Space Agency's BepiColombo mission, which will set off to orbit Mercury in 2013 and study the planet. At a recent BepiColombo working group meeting the upcoming transit caused "no major concern".

Mercury mystery

Glenn Schneider of the University of Arizona at Tucson works on the Hubble Space Telescope's Near Infrared Camera and Multi-Object Spectrometer (NICMOS). He is in Hawaii at the Mees Solar Observatory to watch the transit, which he hopes will open up some otherwise unexplored avenues of investigation.

Schneider will measure the sodium from Mercury's thin outer atmosphere. Sodium is a puzzle on Mercury because, according to some theories about the planet's birth, the element is too volatile to be there. Accurate sodium data will help decipher whether it comes from the planet or from meteor impacts.

But the exosphere has been studied in detail already, says Sean Solomon, a scientist on Nasa's Mercury Messenger mission. Solomon doesn't anticipate any scientific revelations tomorrow, and rather than watching the transit, he intends to wait for the high-resolution data promised by Messenger in the coming years.

Messenger started its circuitous journey to Mercury in 2004 and flew by Venus last week. It will start its Mercury flyby in January 2008, and will enter Mercury's orbit in 2011. Being there will make it much easier to see what's in the atmosphere, says Solomon.

Schneider's team might also try to detect Mercury's very weak magnetic field against that of the Sun's — never yet measured from Earth. "But that will be much harder that the proverbial needle in the haystack," he admits.

Watch and learn

Transits might be better off left to amateur astronomers. Schneider says this transit provides a "wonderful learning experience for students and anyone interested in astronomy". Solomon agrees: "It's like when you look through a telescope and see Saturn's rings," he says. "It's better than looking at it in a text book."

If you do fancy getting a glimpse of Mercury for the last time until 9 May 2016, the transit is fully visible from the west coast of America, the Pacific and the East coast of Australia. Everywhere else will see parts of the transit.

Never stare at the Sun: use Sun filters. And don't try looking for Mercury with the naked eye. Strong binoculars or a small telescope are needed.

The transit will start at 8 November 19:12 UT (14:12 EST or 11:12 PST), and will last for just under five hours.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 14-11-2006, 09:44 AM
ving's Avatar
ving (David)
~Dust bunny breeder~

ving is offline
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: The town of campbells
Posts: 12,359
when you think about it its right. we have probably gathered all information we posibliy can from mercury without actually going there so to the pro it might look pretty but somewhat useless

i wish it had been clear here tho
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 14-11-2006, 11:16 AM
Ric's Avatar
Ric
Support your local RFS

Ric is offline
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Wamboin NSW
Posts: 12,405
As you say Ving, it's all old hat to the professional but it provides amateurs with great image opportunities and a great spectacle to those who have not seen it before.

cheers
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 14-11-2006, 02:29 PM
Outbackmanyep's Avatar
Outbackmanyep
Registered User

Outbackmanyep is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Walcha , NSW
Posts: 1,652
Apart from the Mercury transits,i think the next Transit of Venus will still not make the pro's too interested...the fact is that here in Australia we will see the whole thing....just as Cook did in Tahiti in 1769!
So i hold that transit more significant in as much as its historical connection! I reckon it'd be a big crowd puller!
Better book some clear skies for then!
2012 will be a good year! A total solar eclipse seen in Nth Qld and a Venus Transit!!!!! All we need is a big bright comet to add to it!
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 14-11-2006, 04:09 PM
mickoking's Avatar
mickoking
Vagabond

mickoking is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: China
Posts: 1,477
A Mercury transit may not have much scientific relevence nowadays. But is is something fairly unique and it was certainly interesting to observe.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 14-11-2006, 06:42 PM
robagar's Avatar
robagar
lost in Calabi-Yau space

robagar is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Cairns
Posts: 161
Quote:
Originally Posted by sheeny
And don't try looking for Mercury with the naked eye. Strong binoculars or a small telescope are needed.
Now, that could be *really* badly misinterpreted
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 14-11-2006, 07:44 PM
sheeny's Avatar
sheeny (Al)
Spam Hunter

sheeny is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Oberon NSW
Posts: 14,437
Quote:
Originally Posted by robagar
Now, that could be *really* badly misinterpreted
Yes. Don't worry I noticed that too, but since I was quoting the document figured I should leave it.

Al.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +10. The time is now 03:47 AM.

Powered by vBulletin Version 3.8.7 | Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Advertisement
Bintel
Advertisement