Go Back   IceInSpace > Equipment > ATM and DIY Projects
Register FAQ Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread
  #1  
Old 15-09-2016, 12:48 PM
glend (Glen)
Registered User

glend is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: Lake Macquarie
Posts: 7,121
Folding Refractor Astro Flat Mirrors

I am considering building a 127mm f12 folded refractor from parts i already have, but i will need two high quality well coated flat mirrors for bouncing the light path within the 'box'. Given that the objective is 127mm, the flat mirrors do not have to be very big. Anyone know of a source of high quality flat mirrors? I am tempted to just use newt secondary ellipical mirrors and blacken the unrequired ends with flocking. These are readily available, i just need the minor axis, and can use secondary stalks to mount them and adjust. Anyone see a problem with that approach?

Last edited by glend; 15-09-2016 at 01:04 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 15-09-2016, 02:55 PM
dannat's Avatar
dannat (Daniel)
daniel

dannat is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Macedon shire, Australia
Posts: 3,427
nope a guy on CN who built a 5" bino uing 2x127mm obj. just used 2nd'ary mirrors -he used holders so he can collimate it easily also. he said it was hard to source good quality flat mirrors, so ordinary secondaries did the trick, he didn't bother blackening any section -but he didn't have the light path crossing over either
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 15-09-2016, 02:56 PM
Merlin66's Avatar
Merlin66 (Ken)
Registered User

Merlin66 is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Junortoun Vic
Posts: 8,927
Glen,
I use many front surface mirrors in my DIY spectroscopes...
Obtaining the shape (Square/rectangular/elliptical) the required surface accuracy, and preferred coatings is an expensive challenge.
For my smaller mirrors I used Knight Optics in the UK, but I think you're on the right track with your thoughts of using secondary mirrors.
Bang per buck they give a good quality alternative and are readily available.
No optical issues other than the sizing of the mirrors (for required FOV) and the mounting plates (to give X-Y-Z alignment).
Sounds like an interesting project.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 16-09-2016, 11:09 AM
ZeroID's Avatar
ZeroID (Brent)
Lost in Space ....

ZeroID is offline
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Auckland, NZ
Posts: 4,949
OK, so you've conquered the cooled DSLR problem, now you're going to fold scopes in half ......
This should be fun to watch ...
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 16-09-2016, 11:15 AM
glend (Glen)
Registered User

glend is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: Lake Macquarie
Posts: 7,121
Quote:
Originally Posted by ZeroID View Post
OK, so you've conquered the cooled DSLR problem, now you're going to fold scopes in half ......
This should be fun to watch ...
Actually in thirds Brent, and only considering at this point. I need to work out the diameter of the flat mirrors required and see if there is a standard newt secondary mirror that would suit. Drawings to do, calculations to make, then a decision.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 16-09-2016, 11:42 AM
billdan's Avatar
billdan (Bill)
Registered User

billdan is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Narangba, SE QLD
Posts: 1,551
Glen you are probably aware that Edmund Scientific sell Optical Flats at selectable wavefront surfaces.

They are expensive though, a 50mm diam one tenth wave flat is $200.

Cheers
Bill
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 16-09-2016, 01:33 PM
glend (Glen)
Registered User

glend is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: Lake Macquarie
Posts: 7,121
Quote:
Originally Posted by billdan View Post
Glen you are probably aware that Edmund Scientific sell Optical Flats at selectable wavefront surfaces.

They are expensive though, a 50mm diam one tenth wave flat is $200.

Cheers
Bill
Yes Bill i have looked what Edmund's offers and while its great stuff it is far too expensive for my project. A GSO secondary will do the job and are pretty cheap.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 16-09-2016, 03:18 PM
Kunama
...

Kunama is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Posts: 3,588
4" and 3.1" secondaries might do the trick Glen.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 16-09-2016, 07:52 PM
ZeroID's Avatar
ZeroID (Brent)
Lost in Space ....

ZeroID is offline
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Auckland, NZ
Posts: 4,949
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kunama View Post
4" and 3.1" secondaries might do the trick Glen.
Sounds about right ... with a wee bit of room to wriggle depending on placement
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 19-09-2016, 09:58 PM
OzEclipse's Avatar
OzEclipse (Joe Cali)
Registered User

OzEclipse is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: '34 South' Young Hilltops LGA, Australia
Posts: 1,481
don't forget that wavefront errors propagate. A threefold two mirror system is effectively a three mirror system when you add a mirror diagonal. Are GSO flats 1/10wave p-p or rms? If they are p-p rms then 3 refelctions will give you a 1/3 wave system, if they are rms, you'll have more like a 2/3 to 1 wave system. Sorry, long day at work & too stuffed to do the exact calcs. If you use GSO's you'll end up with a very very low power telescope.

http://www.nova-optical.com/Flat%20Mirrors.htm
expensive but good.

Joe

Last edited by OzEclipse; 20-09-2016 at 09:20 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 19-09-2016, 10:54 PM
glend (Glen)
Registered User

glend is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: Lake Macquarie
Posts: 7,121
Never mind, change of plans, will not be deconstructing my nice iStar f12.

Thread closed. Thanks to all.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +10. The time is now 01:23 PM.

Powered by vBulletin Version 3.8.7 | Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Advertisement
Bintel
Advertisement