ICEINSPACE
Moon Phase
CURRENT MOON
Waning Crescent 11%
|
|

03-11-2006, 11:31 PM
|
 |
6EQUJ5
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Sydney
Posts: 3,663
|
|
Ok no googling-what's the largest known galaxy
I was asked this question today and was stumped .. thought it was M81 but I was not even close..
so who knows..and no googling allowed
BTW the usually reliable wikipedia seems to have this one at odds with other sources
|

04-11-2006, 12:08 AM
|
 |
Supernova Searcher
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Cambroon Queensland Australia
Posts: 9,326
|
|
at a guess I'd say M87 or something like it
|

04-11-2006, 12:39 AM
|
 |
Space Explorer
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Caloundra, Sunshine Coast, Australia
Posts: 1,571
|
|
I assume we're talking REAL size here, just to clarify .... ??
|

04-11-2006, 12:41 AM
|
 |
1300 THESKY
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Cairns Qld
Posts: 2,405
|
|
I'm with Ron on that one, with stars measured in the "Trillions" M87 would have to go close as the winner.
|

04-11-2006, 08:36 AM
|
Registered User
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 1,013
|
|
I agree...M87 is a likely candidate for the prize!
|

04-11-2006, 12:42 PM
|
 |
Spam Hunter
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Oberon NSW
Posts: 14,438
|
|
OK...
Smart A Answer No 1: Largest apparent size = Milky Way.
Smart A Answer No 2: It probably hasn't been found yet, but will be found in the future, but maybe not.
As for a serious attempt... I'm with you Seeker - stumped!
Al.
|

04-11-2006, 01:32 PM
|
 |
Lost in Namibia
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Albury NSW
Posts: 3,134
|
|
If no Googling - can we use other reference material ?
Cheers Petra
|

04-11-2006, 07:21 PM
|
 |
6EQUJ5
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Sydney
Posts: 3,663
|
|
Oh well I am glad to see I'm not the only one who didnt know the answer to this...google away but even that didn't seem to provide a definite answer?
|

05-11-2006, 08:13 PM
|
 |
Gravity does not Suck
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Tabulam
Posts: 17,003
|
|
I can not find anything but I recall something about 18mths ago saying in effect the favorite here was out done...thats why it was news, but I am begining to think I dreamed it, cause I usually keep stuff like that but cant find anything like I recall.
alex
|

05-11-2006, 08:20 PM
|
 |
The 'DRAGON MAN'
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: In the Dark at Snake Valley, Victoria
Posts: 14,412
|
|
The Narayan Galaxy!
|

05-11-2006, 08:46 PM
|
 |
6EQUJ5
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Sydney
Posts: 3,663
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by ballaratdragons
The Narayan Galaxy! 
|
LOL
but no cigar!
|

05-11-2006, 09:27 PM
|
 |
Lost in Namibia
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Albury NSW
Posts: 3,134
|
|
Well done Ken, how did you find it? I would be interested in doing a little reading on it.
Cheers Petra
|

05-11-2006, 09:43 PM
|
 |
Gravity does not Suck
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Tabulam
Posts: 17,003
|
|
|

05-11-2006, 09:46 PM
|
 |
Gravity does not Suck
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Tabulam
Posts: 17,003
|
|
They may be pulling your leg, thats Seeker's name so if they are not fooling its a big coincidence.
Best wishes
alex
|

10-11-2006, 01:55 PM
|
 |
Registered User
|
|
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Brisbane
Posts: 4,485
|
|
Was scanning the internet and came across this
Largest Galaxy
The central galaxy of Abell 2029 galaxy cluster, 1070 million light years distant in Virgo has a major diameter of 5,600,000 light years - 80n times the diameter of the Milky Way announced in July 1990.
This is probably the answer to you question
|

10-11-2006, 06:15 PM
|
 |
Gravity does not Suck
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Tabulam
Posts: 17,003
|
|
Ok we have a bid of 5,600,000 light years can we improve on that..
Is that not mind boggling  . I wonder if there is anyone there?
and given that it is so relatively close we will probably be in it one day.
alex
|

10-11-2006, 06:36 PM
|
 |
Colour is over-rated
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Newcastle, Australia
Posts: 2,414
|
|
I find it difficult to imagine the distance to alpha-centauri.... let alone out of the milky way disc, let alone anywhere else....
|

12-11-2006, 07:34 AM
|
 |
Gravity does not Suck
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Tabulam
Posts: 17,003
|
|
I have been thinking about the enorminty of this galaxy its size could be expressed as a percentage of the observable Universe  .. how can it be so big and "hold" together. If gravity acts at C how does the right hand know what the left hand is doing  and given the current view on the age of the Universe how could it grow to such a size in only 13 billion years approx. Mmmm makes my brain go numb (more than usual) Would the "space" in the gallaxy be expanding to move stars further apart? One would think not as the gravity of such a structure could be expected to overrule such... How much does it bend space time and for how far would its influence be felt?
I doubt if someone will pop up with a simple explanation I am just pondering and sharing my ponders
alex
|

12-11-2006, 07:37 AM
|
 |
Gravity does not Suck
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Tabulam
Posts: 17,003
|
|
AND what I should have said earlier..
Thank you Allan for bringing us up to date.
alex
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT +10. The time is now 07:02 AM.
|
|