Go Back   IceInSpace > General Astronomy > General Chat
Register FAQ Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread
  #1  
Old 03-11-2006, 11:31 PM
seeker372011's Avatar
seeker372011 (Narayan)
6EQUJ5

seeker372011 is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Sydney
Posts: 3,663
Ok no googling-what's the largest known galaxy

I was asked this question today and was stumped .. thought it was M81 but I was not even close..

so who knows..and no googling allowed

BTW the usually reliable wikipedia seems to have this one at odds with other sources
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 04-11-2006, 12:08 AM
astroron's Avatar
astroron (Ron)
Supernova Searcher

astroron is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Cambroon Queensland Australia
Posts: 9,326
at a guess I'd say M87 or something like it
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 04-11-2006, 12:39 AM
Gargoyle_Steve's Avatar
Gargoyle_Steve (Steve)
Space Explorer

Gargoyle_Steve is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Caloundra, Sunshine Coast, Australia
Posts: 1,571
I assume we're talking REAL size here, just to clarify .... ??
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 04-11-2006, 12:41 AM
gaa_ian's Avatar
gaa_ian (Ian)
1300 THESKY

gaa_ian is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Cairns Qld
Posts: 2,405
I'm with Ron on that one, with stars measured in the "Trillions" M87 would have to go close as the winner.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 04-11-2006, 08:36 AM
astro_nutt
Registered User

astro_nutt is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 1,013
I agree...M87 is a likely candidate for the prize!
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 04-11-2006, 12:42 PM
sheeny's Avatar
sheeny (Al)
Spam Hunter

sheeny is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Oberon NSW
Posts: 14,438
OK...

Smart A Answer No 1: Largest apparent size = Milky Way.

Smart A Answer No 2: It probably hasn't been found yet, but will be found in the future, but maybe not.

As for a serious attempt... I'm with you Seeker - stumped!

Al.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 04-11-2006, 12:50 PM
[1ponders]'s Avatar
[1ponders] (Paul)
Retired, damn no pension

[1ponders] is offline
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Obi Obi, Qld
Posts: 18,778
I don't know (and couldn't find) what is the largest galaxy, though I did come across this page
http://curious.astro.cornell.edu/que...php?number=412
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 04-11-2006, 01:32 PM
spacezebra's Avatar
spacezebra (Petra)
Lost in Namibia

spacezebra is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Albury NSW
Posts: 3,134
If no Googling - can we use other reference material ?

Cheers Petra
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 04-11-2006, 07:21 PM
seeker372011's Avatar
seeker372011 (Narayan)
6EQUJ5

seeker372011 is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Sydney
Posts: 3,663
Oh well I am glad to see I'm not the only one who didnt know the answer to this...google away but even that didn't seem to provide a definite answer?
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 05-11-2006, 08:13 PM
xelasnave's Avatar
xelasnave
Gravity does not Suck

xelasnave is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Tabulam
Posts: 17,003
I can not find anything but I recall something about 18mths ago saying in effect the favorite here was out done...thats why it was news, but I am begining to think I dreamed it, cause I usually keep stuff like that but cant find anything like I recall.
alex
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 05-11-2006, 08:20 PM
ballaratdragons's Avatar
ballaratdragons (Ken)
The 'DRAGON MAN'

ballaratdragons is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: In the Dark at Snake Valley, Victoria
Posts: 14,412
The Narayan Galaxy!
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 05-11-2006, 08:46 PM
seeker372011's Avatar
seeker372011 (Narayan)
6EQUJ5

seeker372011 is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Sydney
Posts: 3,663
Quote:
Originally Posted by ballaratdragons
The Narayan Galaxy!
LOL

but no cigar!
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 05-11-2006, 09:27 PM
spacezebra's Avatar
spacezebra (Petra)
Lost in Namibia

spacezebra is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Albury NSW
Posts: 3,134
Well done Ken, how did you find it? I would be interested in doing a little reading on it.


Cheers Petra
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 05-11-2006, 09:43 PM
xelasnave's Avatar
xelasnave
Gravity does not Suck

xelasnave is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Tabulam
Posts: 17,003
I found it everything in the observable Universe is being drawn to it. I am sure someone will have a link soon
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 05-11-2006, 09:46 PM
xelasnave's Avatar
xelasnave
Gravity does not Suck

xelasnave is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Tabulam
Posts: 17,003
They may be pulling your leg, thats Seeker's name so if they are not fooling its a big coincidence.
Best wishes
alex
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 10-11-2006, 01:55 PM
allan gould's Avatar
allan gould
Registered User

allan gould is offline
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Brisbane
Posts: 4,485
Was scanning the internet and came across this

Largest Galaxy
The central galaxy of Abell 2029 galaxy cluster, 1070 million light years distant in Virgo has a major diameter of 5,600,000 light years - 80n times the diameter of the Milky Way announced in July 1990.

This is probably the answer to you question
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 10-11-2006, 06:15 PM
xelasnave's Avatar
xelasnave
Gravity does not Suck

xelasnave is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Tabulam
Posts: 17,003
Ok we have a bid of 5,600,000 light years can we improve on that..
Is that not mind boggling . I wonder if there is anyone there?
and given that it is so relatively close we will probably be in it one day.
alex
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 10-11-2006, 06:36 PM
Lee's Avatar
Lee
Colour is over-rated

Lee is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Newcastle, Australia
Posts: 2,414
I find it difficult to imagine the distance to alpha-centauri.... let alone out of the milky way disc, let alone anywhere else....
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 12-11-2006, 07:34 AM
xelasnave's Avatar
xelasnave
Gravity does not Suck

xelasnave is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Tabulam
Posts: 17,003
I have been thinking about the enorminty of this galaxy its size could be expressed as a percentage of the observable Universe .. how can it be so big and "hold" together. If gravity acts at C how does the right hand know what the left hand is doing and given the current view on the age of the Universe how could it grow to such a size in only 13 billion years approx. Mmmm makes my brain go numb (more than usual) Would the "space" in the gallaxy be expanding to move stars further apart? One would think not as the gravity of such a structure could be expected to overrule such... How much does it bend space time and for how far would its influence be felt?
I doubt if someone will pop up with a simple explanation I am just pondering and sharing my ponders
alex
Reply With Quote
  #20  
Old 12-11-2006, 07:37 AM
xelasnave's Avatar
xelasnave
Gravity does not Suck

xelasnave is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Tabulam
Posts: 17,003
AND what I should have said earlier..
Thank you Allan for bringing us up to date.
alex
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +10. The time is now 07:02 AM.

Powered by vBulletin Version 3.8.7 | Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Advertisement
Bintel
Advertisement