Go Back   IceInSpace > Beginners Start Here > Beginners Astrophotography
Register FAQ Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread
  #1  
Old 25-07-2016, 10:38 AM
thegableguy's Avatar
thegableguy (Chris)
Registered User

thegableguy is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2016
Location: NSW Central Coast, Australia
Posts: 337
Eagle & Trifid

These seem to be popular targets right now!

Both shots taken last night with the same settings:
Orion ED80, NEQ6 unguided
Nikon D3300 @ ISO 1600
20 x 75 seconds
Darks, flats, bias
Stacked & edited in DSS, final edits in Lightroom

Suggestions for improvement?

I'm kinda running over the same old ground here. Wondering what comes next. Might start a new thread on that subject.
Attached Thumbnails
Click for full-size image (Trifid 160724-2.jpg)
221.4 KB62 views
Click for full-size image (Eagle 160724 v2.jpg)
200.4 KB49 views
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 25-07-2016, 11:00 AM
Mickoid (Michael)
Registered User

Mickoid is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2016
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 1,533
Chris, not bad tracking for unguided at 75secs. Was the moon up when you took tbese shots? Always difficult to capture faint nebulosity under a gibbous moon. Even if below the horizon moon glow can wash out your shots so you've done well. I'd back off a little on the background density but that's a personal choice, it can help show more faint nebulosity but the moon was probably reducing the transparency already. I like the colours in the Triffid.

Last edited by Mickoid; 25-07-2016 at 11:33 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 25-07-2016, 11:12 AM
thegableguy's Avatar
thegableguy (Chris)
Registered User

thegableguy is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2016
Location: NSW Central Coast, Australia
Posts: 337
Thanks!

The Moon wasn't visible from where I was, but I think it was a few degrees above the horizon by the time I finished capturing the Eagle, so yeah it's probably washed out a little detail.

What do you mean by background density? Is that how black the background is? I'm guilty almost always of making it too black and losing detail that way. Contrast is a bit too high, and saturation is probably little much too. Rookie mistakes I know!
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 25-07-2016, 11:32 AM
Mickoid (Michael)
Registered User

Mickoid is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2016
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 1,533
Yeah Chris, the blackness of the background is what I meant. You're right, a little too much contrast perhaps. It's sometimes hard to get the right balance between cutting off faint detail and a black background.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +10. The time is now 08:35 AM.

Powered by vBulletin Version 3.8.7 | Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Advertisement
Bintel
Advertisement