Go Back   IceInSpace > Beginners Start Here > Beginners Astrophotography
Register FAQ Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread
  #1  
Old 20-06-2016, 03:33 PM
benklerk
Registered User

benklerk is offline
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Katoomba
Posts: 292
2nd Attempt at a galaxy (NGC 4945)

Last week was my best polar alignment so far, got under 1 arc min with guiding. I also changed from ST-4 port guiding to Ascom guiding which seemed to make a big difference.
I spent some time on 2 objects. Redone Omega Cent and NGC 4945.

1 min subs x 20 light
1 min subs x 20 dark

Used DSS and Lightroom 6.

On Nikon D7100 DSLR, used DSS and lightroom 6. HEQ5 EQMOD GSO 6".
Still working on Omega Cent, but still need more data. Next time I might try 2 min subs at ISO 1600 and try and get good flats.

Full picture Hi res
http://i.imgur.com/2vv8xia.jpg
Attached Thumbnails
Click for full-size image (NGC 4945 crop j.jpg)
196.9 KB126 views

Last edited by benklerk; 20-06-2016 at 03:43 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 20-06-2016, 07:04 PM
Atmos's Avatar
Atmos (Colin)
Ultimate Noob

Atmos is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 7,013
It looks pretty good so far although I would definitely recommend getting flats next time around It'll remove the vignetting in the corners and you'll be surprised just how much it can help with the image overall.
It is a very dusty region (red) and you've have done a good job with limited data.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 21-06-2016, 08:31 AM
LightningNZ's Avatar
LightningNZ (Cam)
Registered User

LightningNZ is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Canberra
Posts: 951
Very impressive result considering only 20 mins of exposure.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 21-06-2016, 09:29 AM
Luke.'s Avatar
Luke.
Registered User

Luke. is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2016
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 72
I am only just beginning but I have found the flats do make a massive difference in cleaning up the image for me.
I think the stars look great too! Why is it that I see some pictures where the stars have the spikes and others don't?
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 21-06-2016, 10:34 AM
benklerk
Registered User

benklerk is offline
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Katoomba
Posts: 292
Quote:
Originally Posted by Luke. View Post
Why is it that I see some pictures where the stars have the spikes and others don't?
It all depends on the type of telescope used. I use a ritchey chretien which is what the hubble telescope uses. Telescopes which have spider vanes produces star spikes.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 21-06-2016, 11:02 AM
Atmos's Avatar
Atmos (Colin)
Ultimate Noob

Atmos is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 7,013
And pretty much any telescope using a KAF-8300 sensor has spikes too
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 24-06-2016, 12:24 PM
Cimitar (Evan)
Evan Morris

Cimitar is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Gunnedah, NSW
Posts: 250
Nice round stars and you've picked up some great dust detail in the galaxy Good stuff!

Agree with other comments RE: flats etc. If flats seem a bit daunting at first, I recommend trying an artificial flat method which can be done in photoshop. It works fairly well and will highlight the difference it can make to a regular image. I found this resource very useful when first exploring artificial flats - http://www.corius.net/?page_id=395

RE: Spiked stars - I artificially introduce some into my images (my telescope doesn't cause them) just to enhance the effect at times, depending on my target audience.

Cheers, Evan
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +10. The time is now 09:10 AM.

Powered by vBulletin Version 3.8.7 | Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Advertisement
Bintel
Advertisement