Go Back   IceInSpace > Beginners Start Here > Beginners Astrophotography
Register FAQ Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread
  #1  
Old 20-04-2016, 09:32 PM
Craige's Avatar
Craige
Registered User

Craige is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Northern NSW
Posts: 131
M83

My learning curve continues with the ZWO ASI 174MM Cool camera. Finally completed my first RGB image! I have been mainly experimenting with Ha.

Red 9 x 5 min subs
Green 10 x 5 min subs
Blue 10 x 5 min subs

Darks, Flats and Bias applied processed in PixInsight (Novice)

More data will help this image, I plan to obtain more during the next new moon if the clouds leave me alone!


http://astrob.in/245962/0/

Any feedback appreciated, I am still trying to get my head around PixInsight.

Thanks for looking!
Attached Thumbnails
Click for full-size image (M83-jpg-IIS.jpg)
61.5 KB70 views

Last edited by Craige; 20-04-2016 at 09:52 PM. Reason: Added image
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 20-04-2016, 09:53 PM
Atmos's Avatar
Atmos (Colin)
Ultimate Noob

Atmos is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 7,013
PixInsight will take a lot of getting your head around

It is a nice beginning, what will help a lot will be getting some good quality Luminance, that alone will make it a lot easier to process.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 20-04-2016, 10:02 PM
Craige's Avatar
Craige
Registered User

Craige is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Northern NSW
Posts: 131
Thanks Colin. I am enjoying the challenge of mono imaging vs dslr.

Is it better to collect Luminance data or extract from my RGB data in PixInsight?
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 20-04-2016, 10:05 PM
Atmos's Avatar
Atmos (Colin)
Ultimate Noob

Atmos is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 7,013
It is a LOT better to actually collect luminance data. When you blend RGB data together to create a synthetic luminance what it mostly lacks is the signal of having pure luminance.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 20-04-2016, 10:10 PM
Craige's Avatar
Craige
Registered User

Craige is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Northern NSW
Posts: 131
Thanks Colin.

I thought actual Luminance data would be better, however, I had read about synthetic luminance.

Is there a general rule for the ratio of Luminance vs RGB data.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 20-04-2016, 11:07 PM
Atmos's Avatar
Atmos (Colin)
Ultimate Noob

Atmos is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 7,013
Enough RGB data to give good noiseless colour rendition and then pump everything else into Luminance
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 22-04-2016, 02:28 PM
rustigsmed's Avatar
rustigsmed (Russell)
Registered User

rustigsmed is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Mornington Peninsula, Australia
Posts: 3,997
Quote:
Originally Posted by Craige View Post
Thanks Colin.

I thought actual Luminance data would be better, however, I had read about synthetic luminance.

Is there a general rule for the ratio of Luminance vs RGB data.
go for as much L as possible, you can getaway with binning RGB data and using heavy noise reduction on the RGB. some people actually actively blur the RGB data.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +10. The time is now 01:41 PM.

Powered by vBulletin Version 3.8.7 | Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Advertisement
Bintel
Advertisement