Go Back   IceInSpace > Equipment > Eyepieces, Barlows and Filters
Register FAQ Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread
  #1  
Old 26-03-2016, 12:47 PM
Kunama
...

Kunama is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Posts: 3,588
Televue Nagler 31 vs 17. Focus points

Could anyone with both the Nagler 31 and Nagler 17 please check if they are parfocal.

If they are not parfocal, could you indicate how much the difference is and which requires the focuser to be racked in further.

At the moment it looks like the N31 will just come to focus at infinity but if the N17 needs to come in further then I will have to cut the poles on the Blunderbuss!


Muchos Gracias,

Matt
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 26-03-2016, 02:58 PM
Kunama
...

Kunama is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Posts: 3,588
Thanks Glenn and Phil,
Answer found.

When Nagler 31 T5 is set to X, Nagler 17 T4 requires 8.9mm outward movement according to the TV chart.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 26-03-2016, 07:40 PM
tempestwizz's Avatar
tempestwizz (Brian)
Registered User

tempestwizz is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Vientiane, Laos
Posts: 241
Does this offset remain the same if using either of the two paracors?
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 26-03-2016, 07:46 PM
Kunama
...

Kunama is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Posts: 3,588
Can't help you with that one Brian, I don't use Paracorrs, my scope is F5.6 so I can cope without it.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 26-03-2016, 10:07 PM
ausastronomer (John Bambury)
Registered User

ausastronomer is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Shoalhaven Heads, NSW
Posts: 2,620
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kunama View Post
Can't help you with that one Brian, I don't use Paracorrs, my scope is F5.6 so I can cope without it.
Hi Matt,

Even at F5.6 the 17mm Nagler is improved significantly with the use of a paracorr.

Not only does it tighten up the stars and improve the view off axis, it allows you to see dimmer targets and features off axis.

Cheers,
John B
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 27-03-2016, 06:58 AM
Kunama
...

Kunama is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Posts: 3,588
Quote:
Originally Posted by ausastronomer View Post
Hi Matt,

Even at F5.6 the 17mm Nagler is improved significantly with the use of a paracorr.

Not only does it tighten up the stars and improve the view off axis, it allows you to see dimmer targets and features off axis.

Cheers,
John B
Thanks John, I may try to test it out first (before letting the moths out of the wallet). I may have to shorten the poles 10mm to comply with the Naglers' in-focus requirements as I don't want the draw tube intruding into the UTA.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 27-03-2016, 03:09 PM
Don Pensack's Avatar
Don Pensack
Registered User

Don Pensack is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 536
With the Paracorr, set the tunable top for the 31mm Nagler (All the way in, I believe), then remove the 31mm and insert the 17. Refocus using the tunbale top, not the focus knobs.
Look at the setting of the Paracorr. That is the correct setting for the 17mm.
Write it down--you can pre-dial that setting before you insert the 17mm the next time you use it.
Using that technique, you can quickly find the setting for your entire collection of eyepieces of any brand.
And yes, the implication that all your eyepieces will essentially become parfocal as far as the focuser is concerned is correct. Your entire collection of eyepieces will focus within 1mm, maybe 2mm of focuser travel with the Paracorr in place.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 27-03-2016, 03:22 PM
Kunama
...

Kunama is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Posts: 3,588
Hello Don,
Thanks very much, I am actually now thinking of getting the SIPS from Wayne at Starlight as it will fit readily with the FTF 2015BCR-LW focuser on my scope.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 28-03-2016, 01:26 AM
Don Pensack's Avatar
Don Pensack
Registered User

Don Pensack is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 536
Just remember that, with the SIPS, your eyepieces will not be parfocal, so the focuser will likely need at least 1.5" or more of travel.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 28-03-2016, 07:50 AM
Kunama
...

Kunama is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Posts: 3,588
Quote:
Originally Posted by Don Pensack View Post
Just remember that, with the SIPS, your eyepieces will not be parfocal, so the focuser will likely need at least 1.5" or more of travel.
Thanks Don, looks like the Nagler 31 requires the most inward travel of any eyepiece I am likely to use so I will set the pole lengths based on that eyepiece, then I will have the full 1.5" available to accommodate my other eyepieces.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +10. The time is now 05:54 AM.

Powered by vBulletin Version 3.8.7 | Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Advertisement
Bintel
Advertisement