Go Back   IceInSpace > Equipment > Equipment Discussions
Register FAQ Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread
  #1  
Old 19-10-2006, 10:14 AM
casstony
Registered User

casstony is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Warragul, Vic
Posts: 4,494
Dobsonian design questions

I've probably been thinking a little harder than I should about this but I'm curious whether these design changes could work on a Lightbridge, particularly the 12" lightbridge.

Could you use 4 inch shorter truss tubes to allow lower power use of a binoviewer? Would this require a larger secondary mirror?

If the above is achievable the scope would be 4" shorter for seated viewing and a focuser extension tube (or different focuser) could be used for mono mode.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 19-10-2006, 10:29 AM
janoskiss's Avatar
janoskiss (Steve H)
Registered User

janoskiss is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Sale, VIC
Posts: 6,033
Unless you get a 2" binoviewer with a huge clear aperture, you must put correcting optics (i.e., barlow, OCA) that slows down the light cone (i.e., increases magnification) between the focuser and binoviewer when you use the BV with a fast scope. This is needed not only to move the focal plane farther out of the focuser, but also to allow proper illumination of the focal plane at the EP's field stop. This is because when you have say a BV with a generous 26mm clear aperture and an optical path length of 120mm, it has the same effect as placing your EP at the end of a 120mm length of 26mm diameter tube. If the lightcone is too fast (steep) it just physically wont fit in that long thin tube for all or most points in the focal plane. At f/5, your fully illuminated field will be only about 2mm in diameter. For a 12" lightbridge with a FL of 1500mm, that is just 4.6 arc minutes or about 0.08 degree.

In short, it's not worth it. You are much better off with a good OCA.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 19-10-2006, 11:03 AM
rmcpb's Avatar
rmcpb (Rob)
Compulsive Tinkerer

rmcpb is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Blue Mountains, NSW
Posts: 1,766
What Steve said. That is a HUGE mod and would need the whole top end of the scope redesigned otherwise you will be losing light by the bucket load.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 19-10-2006, 02:44 PM
casstony
Registered User

casstony is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Warragul, Vic
Posts: 4,494
Thanks for the answers guys.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 19-10-2006, 09:55 PM
74tuc
Registered User

74tuc is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Sandy Creek(Sth.Aust.)
Posts: 153
Nice Newtonian design program available here:

http://home.att.net/~dale.keller/atm...t/newtsoft.htm

Test your mods using this program. Yes! it is a big mod.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +10. The time is now 09:39 AM.

Powered by vBulletin Version 3.8.7 | Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Advertisement
Bintel
Advertisement