Go Back   IceInSpace > Equipment > Software and Computers
Register FAQ Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread
  #1  
Old 17-09-2015, 03:23 PM
graham.hobart's Avatar
graham.hobart (Graham stevens)
DeepSkySlacker

graham.hobart is offline
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: hobart, tasmania
Posts: 2,231
CCD inspector

I am thinking of getting CCD inspector to tweak the collimation of my f4 Newt.
I see that it supports Maxim + RAW -so does this imply that it will work OK with my DLSR if I run it through Maxim?
My CCD is too heavy for the focuser at the moment so I don't want to add focuser flexure into the mix.
Proposed -canon 60da and Maxim Dl 5 plus ? CCD inspector

thanks for any hints /advice as I have not bought it yet and think it would be a useful software addition.
Graz
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 17-09-2015, 04:29 PM
peter_4059's Avatar
peter_4059 (Peter)
Big Scopes are Cool

peter_4059 is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: SE Tasmania
Posts: 4,572
I'd recommend getting the Catseye collimation kit rather than CCDInspector having tried both options.

The Catseye uses multiple reflections so you end up with multiples of the light path to assess errors. CCDInspector is trying to infer collimation errors based on a single focal length derived image.

http://www.catseyecollimation.com/

"When all the images are merged (and there are 4), the accuracy of alignment is actually the best obtainable on the planet as a result of the 4th (faintest inverted) reflection being a result of multiple reflections totaling 7 focal lengths away from your eye - far more resolution than is attainable with a 2-pass laser."
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 17-09-2015, 04:34 PM
garymck (Gary)
Registered User

garymck is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Geelong
Posts: 819
Hi,

my own experience is that CCD inspector is only good for getting you roughly collimated - once you get close it produces variable results and becomes unreliable. Not worth it's excessively high price. Try Max Selector here for free - and automate your whole observatory
http://www.felopaul.com/

Cheers
Gary
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 19-09-2015, 10:42 PM
Geoff45's Avatar
Geoff45 (Geoff)
PI rules

Geoff45 is offline
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Sydney
Posts: 2,631
Quote:
Originally Posted by garymck View Post
Hi,

my own experience is that CCD inspector is only good for getting you roughly collimated - once you get close it produces variable results and becomes unreliable. Not worth it's excessively high price. Try Max Selector here for free - and automate your whole observatory
http://www.felopaul.com/

Cheers
Gary
I agree. I find CCDInspector most useful for checking FWHM while imaging. If it creeps up significantly I refocus.
Geoff
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 26-09-2015, 10:35 AM
peter_4059's Avatar
peter_4059 (Peter)
Big Scopes are Cool

peter_4059 is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: SE Tasmania
Posts: 4,572
here you go....
http://www.iceinspace.com.au/forum/s...d.php?t=138957
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +10. The time is now 11:57 AM.

Powered by vBulletin Version 3.8.7 | Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Advertisement
Bintel
Advertisement