Quote:
Originally Posted by Atmos
Once some of that noise goes that galaxy is just going to put out 
Is that the remnants of a satellite in the top right corner?
|
Thanks Colin--yep, satellite trail. I'll wipe it in the next iteration
Quote:
Originally Posted by gregbradley
Very nice Geoff. I had this on my list of possible targets then I realised I had imaged it before.
More exposure will smooth it out but its looking great already.
Greg.
|
Thanks Greg. This was actually a last minute decision. One of the other imagers was doing it and so I got the heads up. I hadn't known about it before.
Quote:
Originally Posted by codemonkey
That looks really good considering you're sampling at 0.73"/px and seeing was 2.5" FWHM.... doesn't seem to gel with my (limited) experience. Tell me your secrets! 
|
Thanks Lee. Let's look at it in terms of pixels. The ideal is an FWHM of three pixels--much less and it's undersampled so you get blocky stars, more and it's oversampled, but that's not really a problem, although if you are very oversampled it may be a good idea to bin and increase your SNR. So at 0.73asp and an FWHM of 2.5" I'm hitting the sweet spot.
See here
http://www.stanmooreastro.com/pixel_size.htm Have a look at the section "
Optimal Sampling for Resolution".
Geoff