Go Back   IceInSpace > Equipment > Eyepieces, Barlows and Filters
Register FAQ Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread
  #1  
Old 02-10-2006, 05:11 PM
matt's Avatar
matt
6000 post club member

matt is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Launceston, Australia
Posts: 6,570
C9.25 + 27mm Pano

I've been offered a 27mm Panoptic at a good price, but am wondering if it will work well with my 9.25 SCT?

My 9.25 has a 1.25" visual back, which means I'll have to use the 2" 27mm Pano in a diagonal with an adaptor.

Does using a 2" eyepiece with a scope with a 1.25" visual back present any probs with vignetting, kidneybeaning etc???

Will the scope deliver enough light to the eyepiece to fully enjoy a 2" piece of glass?

Thanks for your help
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 02-10-2006, 05:29 PM
Striker's Avatar
Striker (Tony)
Whats visual Astronomy

Striker is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Brisbane
Posts: 5,062
Cant give you the precise information Matt but I would say you would have to start looking into 35-40mm eyepieces before you start to have any problems.

I had a 31mm Nagler on 10" Meade LX200 with no problems.

Oh the 1 1/4 visual back...boy thats small.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 02-10-2006, 05:51 PM
matt's Avatar
matt
6000 post club member

matt is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Launceston, Australia
Posts: 6,570
Thanks Tony

Does anyone know if it's possible to replace the 1.25" visual back on a 9.25 with a 2"???
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 02-10-2006, 06:00 PM
Dennis
Dazzled by the Cosmos.

Dennis is offline
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Brisbane
Posts: 11,811
Matt

I purchased an SCT to 2" back from Bintel. Basically, it is a simple tube with an SCT thread on one end and a 2" opening with grub screws the other end. However, you would then need a 2" diagonal?

Cheers

Dennis

PS Have a look at "Telescope Accessories" Page 6 on the Bintel site https://www.bintelshop.com.au/welcome.htm for the Orion 2" Visual Back for SCT at $39.00 (3rd row, last column)
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 02-10-2006, 06:07 PM
matt's Avatar
matt
6000 post club member

matt is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Launceston, Australia
Posts: 6,570
Thanks Dennis

So does that mean our 9.25s have a native 2" aperture?

Is that simply an adaptor that Bintel sells?
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 02-10-2006, 06:09 PM
Striker's Avatar
Striker (Tony)
Whats visual Astronomy

Striker is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Brisbane
Posts: 5,062
Dont Peterson make one for celestron.....??????

http://www.petersonengineering.com/SkyDiv/EO.htm
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 02-10-2006, 06:12 PM
Dennis
Dazzled by the Cosmos.

Dennis is offline
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Brisbane
Posts: 11,811
Hi Matt

I don't think the hole at the end of the 9 1/4 is a full 2" (50.8mm), but I believe that this should not be a problem for 2" eyepieces with focal lengths of less that say, 35mm? That is, no vignetting effect. However, I'm guessing here so maybe someone who knows more definitely can chip in?

Yes - it's a simple tube with a couple of grub screws. I understand Lumicon offer a similar adapter but with the internal copper ring and a grub screw instead.

Cheers

Dennis
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 02-10-2006, 07:28 PM
ausastronomer (John Bambury)
Registered User

ausastronomer is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Shoalhaven Heads, NSW
Posts: 2,620
Matt,

You're limited by the diameter of the baffle tube in the C9.25 when attaching the 2" visual back. I can tell you that Gary Kopff uses a 35mm Panoptic with his C8 without any vignetting issues, so the 27mm Panoptic with the C9.25 will be fine.

CS-John B
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +10. The time is now 07:08 AM.

Powered by vBulletin Version 3.8.7 | Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Advertisement
Bintel
Advertisement