Superb! Some might complain that the very brightest bits are burned out, but I think that we all know what they look like, and it is more interesting to do what you have done: show the fainter bits and their relationship to the bright bits.
I'm assuming you've mapped it to achieve a "natural" look. Would you consider posting a version in Hubble palette?
Hi Slawomir,
It seems everyone has Arachnophilia.
There are infinite versions of this nebula.
The picture has lots of detail - it's nice & sharp.
I think you'll be like me & want to re-process your data.
I would try to handle the brighter areas by layering in an earlier version of the first stretched version with a blurred layer mask.
A colour boost in LAB mode might give you more colour but
then you'll get colour noise so you'll need to do a layer mask to only
reduce noise in the darker areas.
I'm assuming you've mapped it to achieve a "natural" look. Would you consider posting a version in Hubble palette?
Best,
Mike
The image is a result of LRGB combination from narrowband data. Unfortunately where I live light pollution is so intense that 12nm filters are inadequate, and having only one 3nm filter (Halpha) I use it as a luminance channel for the other two that are 12nm filters. This technique works okay for me, although I would love to be able to be able to create narrowband images, including Hubble palette, without blending.
Its' looking better & better.
If you'd used NASA Fits Liberator to stretch the FITS stacks with the function of x^(1/5) it would have done the hard stretching for you.
Its' looking better & better.
If you'd used NASA Fits Liberator to stretch the FITS stacks with the function of x^(1/5) it would have done the hard stretching for you.
cheers
Allan
Thank you for the hint Allan. Will certainly look it up.