Go Back   IceInSpace > Equipment > Equipment Discussions
Register FAQ Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread
  #1  
Old 23-08-2006, 08:06 PM
mick pinner's Avatar
mick pinner
Astrolounge

mick pinner is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: monbulk-vic
Posts: 2,010
6.3 Focal Reducer

does anyone know if placing a focal reducer in different positions in the imaging train (SCT) effects the actual focal reduction.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 23-08-2006, 09:56 PM
asimov's Avatar
asimov (John)
Planet photographer

asimov is offline
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Bundaberg
Posts: 8,819
Hi Mick.

Not sure about that one but an F-0.6FR will produce F-0.3 if a 1.4" extension is used to get the FR away from the chip on a toucam.

But when you look at it, it is actually putting the FR closer to the SCT corrector & the chip remains the same distance away IF your seating the webcam into the focuser all the way on both occasions..

http://webcaddy.com.au/astro/adapter.htm

I could be looking at all this in the wrong aspect though..
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 23-08-2006, 11:50 PM
Gama's Avatar
Gama
Registered User

Gama is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 1,121
The simple aswer is YES.
When i used it with my SCT i used a diagonal then the ccd camera. This lowered the f ratio even more. Try it..
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 24-08-2006, 07:54 AM
Lester's Avatar
Lester
Registered User

Lester is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: E.P. S.A.
Posts: 4,963
Hi Mick,

I am led to believe that there are different kinds of Meade f6.3 focal reducers. When I mounted mine at the rear of the SCT and then the flip-mirror, and the camera, I couldn't get focus. I had to get adapters made up by Steve Mogg. Now I have the focal reducer after the flip-mirror and then the camera, and focus is achieved.

When Meade got the focal reducers made in China some of the characteristics changed eg focus point.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 24-08-2006, 11:38 AM
Striker's Avatar
Striker (Tony)
Whats visual Astronomy

Striker is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Brisbane
Posts: 5,062
Yes Mick it does.

The further the camera is away from the reducer the lower F ratio...but it does have an optimal distance...something around 100mm from the reducer to the chip is F6.3.....I dont think you would want to push it any further then that.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 24-08-2006, 12:43 PM
mick pinner's Avatar
mick pinner
Astrolounge

mick pinner is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: monbulk-vic
Posts: 2,010
thanks guys.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 24-08-2006, 01:50 PM
rogerg's Avatar
rogerg (Roger)
Registered User

rogerg is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Perth, Western Australia
Posts: 4,563
I find the focal reducers quite sensitive to position in the imaging train. Not only in the focal reduction provided but the quality of image (edge distortion, non-flat field, etc). I find the 3.3 reducer much more fussy than the 6.3 which is really quite tollerant of positioning (and distances).

Roger.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +10. The time is now 11:43 PM.

Powered by vBulletin Version 3.8.7 | Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Advertisement
Bintel
Advertisement