Go Back   IceInSpace > Beginners Start Here > Beginners Astrophotography
Register FAQ Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread
  #1  
Old 28-09-2014, 11:20 PM
PeterEde (Peter)
Prince Planet

PeterEde is offline
 
Join Date: May 2013
Location: Albert Park, Adelaide
Posts: 694
Omega Nebula

I can see I'm going to need a Nebula filter or 2
Omega Nebula
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 29-09-2014, 01:30 AM
cometcatcher's Avatar
cometcatcher (Kevin)
<--- Comet Hale-Bopp

cometcatcher is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Cloudy Mackay
Posts: 6,542
Looks like you're doing fine without a nebula filter. Just give it some more time.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 29-09-2014, 09:38 AM
PeterEde (Peter)
Prince Planet

PeterEde is offline
 
Join Date: May 2013
Location: Albert Park, Adelaide
Posts: 694
Don't filters draw out other colours?
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 29-09-2014, 10:32 AM
RickS's Avatar
RickS (Rick)
PI cult recruiter

RickS is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Brisbane
Posts: 10,584
Nice image, Peter.

Narrowband filters reduce the effect of light pollution significantly but give you a false colour image (and you need a mono camera to make best use of them.)

Cheers,
Rick.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 29-09-2014, 10:55 AM
PeterEde (Peter)
Prince Planet

PeterEde is offline
 
Join Date: May 2013
Location: Albert Park, Adelaide
Posts: 694
So no filter necessary
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 29-09-2014, 12:00 PM
raymo
Registered User

raymo is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: margaret river, western australia
Posts: 6,070
Looks great Peter. You are using a small scope; as Kevin said, it just
needs more time. I understand that many people that want APO quality
images are restricted to small ones by the high cost of larger ones, but
this means that they get far less imaging done in a given time. I would
have thought that the purchase of a 6 or 8" Newt[ from about $200 used]
would allow easier tackling of fainter DSOs.
raymo
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 29-09-2014, 12:04 PM
cometcatcher's Avatar
cometcatcher (Kevin)
<--- Comet Hale-Bopp

cometcatcher is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Cloudy Mackay
Posts: 6,542
Quote:
Originally Posted by PeterEde View Post
So no filter necessary
Well it depends on the object, the camera and how bad the LP is. Most of them attenuate the yellow/orange part of the spectrum and some take out the blue too so you're not shooting with the full spectrum anymore. If you want to experiment, try a cheapy like the Sky watcher nebula filter and see what it does.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 29-09-2014, 12:33 PM
PeterEde (Peter)
Prince Planet

PeterEde is offline
 
Join Date: May 2013
Location: Albert Park, Adelaide
Posts: 694
No problem. I would like to guide in time. But I may have cost my self more in buying the drive motors and not a goto that can take autoguide.
We live and learn
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 29-09-2014, 12:49 PM
cometcatcher's Avatar
cometcatcher (Kevin)
<--- Comet Hale-Bopp

cometcatcher is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Cloudy Mackay
Posts: 6,542
You can always guide manually. Get a guidescope and camera like you would for autoguiding. You still need a PC and a guiding program like PHD. Bring up the cross hairs on PHD and keep the star centered with the hand controller. This method is a bit easier on the neck than a reticle eyepiece and works just as well. Then you can expose for as long as you like.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 29-09-2014, 01:00 PM
PeterEde (Peter)
Prince Planet

PeterEde is offline
 
Join Date: May 2013
Location: Albert Park, Adelaide
Posts: 694
Can I mod the motor controller to incorporate guiding? I'm sure there's a way to hack into the controller. Otherwise I'll plod along with what I have till I can get away with another $2K expenditure on mount and guiding gear.
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 29-09-2014, 02:11 PM
LightningNZ's Avatar
LightningNZ (Cam)
Registered User

LightningNZ is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Canberra
Posts: 951
Peter - I don't use any guiding and am having no problem getting 3-4 minute subs with just using the polar alignment scope.

Your image is nice btw. Just needs more signal to average out the noise. You can also use the Lab colour noise smoothing technique in Photoshop, GIMP or whatever to clean that up a bit. Before you do any stretching, change to Lab colour mode, select the 'a' channel and Gaussian blur it a few pixels: 3 to 5 pixels should do. Do the same to the 'b' channel. Change back to the RGB colour mode. The colour noise should now be greatly suppressed.
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 29-09-2014, 02:41 PM
cometcatcher's Avatar
cometcatcher (Kevin)
<--- Comet Hale-Bopp

cometcatcher is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Cloudy Mackay
Posts: 6,542
Quote:
Originally Posted by PeterEde View Post
Can I mod the motor controller to incorporate guiding? I'm sure there's a way to hack into the controller.
I vaguely remember seeing mods done to non autoguide controllers adding an ST4 port. Can't remember where I saw it. I think it was in the classifieds here some time back. It must be possible.
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 29-09-2014, 02:47 PM
PeterEde (Peter)
Prince Planet

PeterEde is offline
 
Join Date: May 2013
Location: Albert Park, Adelaide
Posts: 694
Quote:
Originally Posted by LightningNZ View Post
Peter - I don't use any guiding and am having no problem getting 3-4 minute subs with just using the polar alignment scope.

Your image is nice btw. Just needs more signal to average out the noise. You can also use the Lab colour noise smoothing technique in Photoshop, GIMP or whatever to clean that up a bit. Before you do any stretching, change to Lab colour mode, select the 'a' channel and Gaussian blur it a few pixels: 3 to 5 pixels should do. Do the same to the 'b' channel. Change back to the RGB colour mode. The colour noise should now be greatly suppressed.
Polar scope? I thought that was pretty much useless down here?
I guess it's one thing to align by EP through the scope but that's not exactly aligning the mount is it
Is there a polar scope to give enough X for the EQ3 I have?

Quote:
Originally Posted by cometcatcher View Post
I vaguely remember seeing mods done to non autoguide controllers adding an ST4 port. Can't remember where I saw it. I think it was in the classifieds here some time back. It must be possible.
I thought I'd seen a post for it too. then using PHD to align. More research required
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 30-09-2014, 12:13 AM
LightningNZ's Avatar
LightningNZ (Cam)
Registered User

LightningNZ is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Canberra
Posts: 951
The EQ3 by default has a hole up the middle to take an optional polar alignment scope. The standard Skywatcher one has the stars of Octans marked in it. Seems to work really well for me. You can always use drift alignment to tweak things but I wouldn't need that unless I wanted to push beyond 5 minute subs.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +10. The time is now 06:01 AM.

Powered by vBulletin Version 3.8.7 | Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Advertisement
Bintel
Advertisement