Go Back   IceInSpace > Equipment > Software and Computers
Register FAQ Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread
  #1  
Old 15-08-2006, 01:47 PM
JohnH's Avatar
JohnH
Member # 159

JohnH is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: NSW
Posts: 1,226
Streaks ruined my m18

Help,

I took 20 3 mins iso800 shots of m18 last night, took darks and flats too. Stacked and processed in IP2.75 as I have done many times before and the result - diagonal streaks appear when I used DD to bring up the nebulosity. What is causing this? I have tried reprocessing a number of times but cannot eliminate the problem. It seems to me the darks are not good - I have some residual amp glow showing too (crpeed out of the image attached though)

I should say this was all done with the camera set to LARGE/FINE (jpeg), is that the problem? (I have done this before too), advice/opinions/ideas welcome?
Attached Thumbnails
Click for full-size image (EagleSteaks.jpg)
148.3 KB46 views
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 15-08-2006, 02:23 PM
JohnG's Avatar
JohnG (John)
Looking Down From Above

JohnG is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Cootamundra, NSW
Posts: 1,711
Try shooting all your images in RAW mode (lights, darks, flats and bias), if your not using it, try Automatic Image Set Processing.

Looks like a JPEG artifact.

Cheers

JohnG

EDIT: I am asuming here that you are using the 20D.

Last edited by JohnG; 15-08-2006 at 03:50 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 15-08-2006, 02:26 PM
asimov's Avatar
asimov (John)
Planet photographer

asimov is offline
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Bundaberg
Posts: 8,819
I had the same trouble with a modded toucam on the triffid last night. Doesn't matter in my case, just having a play.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 15-08-2006, 02:57 PM
JohnH's Avatar
JohnH
Member # 159

JohnH is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: NSW
Posts: 1,226
JohnG,

Yup t'was the 20d - and it could be the JPEGging....I will try again with RAWs when clear...
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 15-08-2006, 03:31 PM
bojan's Avatar
bojan
amateur

bojan is offline
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Mt Waverley, VIC
Posts: 7,108
I think this is not jpg artefact... They tend to be around high contrast details, but never extended to the end of the image.
This looks to me like the RF interference I had in my modified QuickCam, and it turned out it was a faulty cable (when I shortened the cable by cutting off 10cm from each end, getting rid if parts of the cable where it was stressed and bent, the streaks dissapeared).
Maybe you had used your mobile phone while taking this picture?
Bojan
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 15-08-2006, 03:54 PM
rogerg's Avatar
rogerg (Roger)
Registered User

rogerg is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Perth, Western Australia
Posts: 4,563
Are your images reduced (to remove dark & bias) ? It looks to me like you had trailing, corrected for by aligning and stacking the sub frames but because of the guide error you have the noise trailing.

I'd suggest you need to remove the noise (if you're alrready doing reduction on your images then find some other way to hide it - darken the image, processing techniques of various kinds...).

Remember that because your stars have been align correctly that means the noise is now drifting and hence you end up with streaks of noise instead of streaks of stars.

Roger.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 15-08-2006, 04:13 PM
bojan's Avatar
bojan
amateur

bojan is offline
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Mt Waverley, VIC
Posts: 7,108
To determine if this is a noise or not, try to take only dark frames under same conditions ....
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 15-08-2006, 04:24 PM
JohnH's Avatar
JohnH
Member # 159

JohnH is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: NSW
Posts: 1,226
Roger, you nailed it, reviewing my uncalibrated images shows a drift over time aligned with the streaks, not sure quite why that shold be as the shots were autoguided and IIRC there was no reported drift reported in the s'ware....that combined with not enough signal means these shots are not useable. Oh well ...

Bojan - the darks were collected immediately after the imaging run - typically as I pack up so they should be a good match to the lights.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 15-08-2006, 05:36 PM
bojan's Avatar
bojan
amateur

bojan is offline
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Mt Waverley, VIC
Posts: 7,108
So there is nothing like that on darks?
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 15-08-2006, 05:42 PM
JohnH's Avatar
JohnH
Member # 159

JohnH is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: NSW
Posts: 1,226
Darks

Quote:
Originally Posted by bojan
So there is nothing like that on darks?
Nope they look normal - hot pixels, amp glow and random(ish) noise...
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 15-08-2006, 06:10 PM
bojan's Avatar
bojan
amateur

bojan is offline
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Mt Waverley, VIC
Posts: 7,108
Well, that certainly rules out the EMI.....
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 16-08-2006, 12:53 PM
Garyh's Avatar
Garyh
Amongst the stars

Garyh is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Glen Innes, N.S.W.
Posts: 2,888
Hi John, I have had this with my 300d. I put it down myself to a combination of noise, hot pixels and (moire patterns-which are more noticable when the canon uv/ir filter is removed or replaced) and there is some sort of drift or sag between exposures-hense the streaks. Also on a warmer night it is more noticeable as well. I find my 300d sometimes rotates slightly on its adaptor as there is some play in it which does it so I have to be careful not to bump the camera at all.
Hope theres something useful there for you..
CS...Gary
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +10. The time is now 01:43 PM.

Powered by vBulletin Version 3.8.7 | Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Advertisement
Bintel
Advertisement