Go Back   IceInSpace > Images > Terrestrial Photography
Register FAQ Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread
  #1  
Old 14-07-2014, 01:40 PM
Saturn%5's Avatar
Saturn%5 (Graeme)
Registered User

Saturn%5 is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Launceston
Posts: 758
Testing 150-600mm Tamron

Hi Peeps
Just a few shots from my backyard testing the new Tamron 150-600mm on my d5300. Lot of smoke around today.

Very happy with what it can do all shots were taken in Auto just for a Test and starting @150mm then Zoomed @ 600mm.

cheers

Graeme
Attached Thumbnails
Click for full-size image (001.jpg)
182.2 KB76 views
Click for full-size image (002.jpg)
197.6 KB77 views
Click for full-size image (003.jpg)
129.3 KB68 views
Click for full-size image (004.jpg)
103.3 KB71 views
Click for full-size image (JEC_0199.jpg)
195.2 KB68 views
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 14-07-2014, 06:37 PM
Regulus's Avatar
Regulus (Trevor)
Regulus - Couer de Leon

Regulus is offline
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Devonport, Tasmania
Posts: 2,350
I think the comm tower shots about sums it up :-)
A useful lens I think. Looks impressive too.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 15-07-2014, 04:54 PM
Saturn%5's Avatar
Saturn%5 (Graeme)
Registered User

Saturn%5 is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Launceston
Posts: 758
Thanks Trevor yeah it does look the part.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 15-07-2014, 06:04 PM
Derek Klepp's Avatar
Derek Klepp
Registered User

Derek Klepp is offline
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: NE NSW
Posts: 2,469
Graeme it's a great lense .My only problem is that when you shoot directly at the moon and Sun with a 1.4extender you will get internal reflections.I use mine mostly in manual and live view focus.It is excellent value.
Cheers Derek
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 15-07-2014, 06:47 PM
hotspur's Avatar
hotspur (Chris)
Registered User

hotspur is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: south east QLD,Australia
Posts: 2,869
Great work! nice kit!

This sounds like its better that the 150-500 from Sigma.

approx what sort of dollars is this 150-600 ?

My 400L has well and truly paid for its self in royalties and magazine
articles,I wonder what lens I might buy next.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 15-07-2014, 08:59 PM
leon's Avatar
leon
Registered User

leon is online now
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Warrnambool
Posts: 12,811
About $1200-$1300 Chris, have a look here

Leon


http://www.digitalcamerawarehouse.co...tegory17_1.htm
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 15-07-2014, 09:07 PM
hotspur's Avatar
hotspur (Chris)
Registered User

hotspur is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: south east QLD,Australia
Posts: 2,869
Quote:
Originally Posted by leon View Post
About $1200-$1300 Chris, have a look here

Leon


http://www.digitalcamerawarehouse.co...tegory17_1.htm

Thanks Leon.

The images in thread make me think its better than 150-500 Sigma,had a go of one of those,and was not overly fussed.This Tamron one could be worth looking at a bit more,wonder what its like on birds,and how heavy it is-might be harder to hump around the bush.

Be interested to see some animal/bird images.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 16-07-2014, 08:29 AM
Saturn%5's Avatar
Saturn%5 (Graeme)
Registered User

Saturn%5 is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Launceston
Posts: 758
Thanks for the heads up Derek,

Leon price sounds about right This one was $1198 + a free Joby strap from Ted's pre order had to wait like 3 months

Chris it is not light 1.9kg and it does feel very heavy got it to take birds but as always new gear = rain snow and all the bad things hope to get out when the weather clears to see how it goes.

cheers

Graeme.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 16-07-2014, 12:09 PM
hotspur's Avatar
hotspur (Chris)
Registered User

hotspur is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: south east QLD,Australia
Posts: 2,869
Thanks.

I was just told Canon have released a 100-400 L mk II (after 16 yrs)

think its around 2.5K

One of the major factors for me keeping on with the 400 L prime is weight and fairly small space it takes up.

This Tamron appears good value.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 16-07-2014, 03:01 PM
rogerg's Avatar
rogerg (Roger)
Registered User

rogerg is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Perth, Western Australia
Posts: 4,563
Interesting results. Very long lens! I wouldn't mind 600mm for wildlife. It is probably heavier than I'd be happy to carry around though

My wife and I have shared her 100-400L since she bought it in 2004, I'm looking forward to when the new one is actually released to see if it's lighter and by how much.

I have often thought of forgoing all of the above and getting a 200mm f/2.8 L + 2x tele. End up with a very lightweight 400mm F/4 lens.
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 17-07-2014, 09:45 AM
dutch2 (Ingrid)
Registered User

dutch2 is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: Gawler, South Australia
Posts: 559
That's an awesome backyard, Graeme.
Great shots, too.
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 18-07-2014, 04:54 AM
hector (Andrew)
Registered User

hector is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Umina NSW Australia
Posts: 279
impressive results. were you using the lens hood on the shots? I find I must use the hood on the 300 f2.8 or the shots loose contrast.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +10. The time is now 06:02 AM.

Powered by vBulletin Version 3.8.7 | Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Advertisement
Astrophotography Prize
Advertisement
Bintel
Advertisement