Go Back   IceInSpace > Images > Deep Space
Register FAQ Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread
  #1  
Old 10-06-2014, 04:10 PM
rustigsmed's Avatar
rustigsmed (Russell)
Registered User

rustigsmed is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Mornington Peninsula, Australia
Posts: 3,997
a few from the other night - dob

Hi peeps,

Although I have had my EQ8 for ages, i haven't really gotten off my butt to get it all going. Mostly down to the fact I haven't purchased a mono camera yet but that will be soon so I must start thinking about getting it ready.

Anyway this isn't the EQ8 but the old Skywatcher GOTO Dob, just needed a Deep Sky photo hit and with finally a bit of time, and a small window of no cloud 1st quarter moon, i thought what the heck i'll quickly try and nab a couple.

M16 was only about 5 mins worth of subs but came out fairly nice https://www.flickr.com/photos/803366...n/photostream/

NGC 6302 i think was around 3 mins - (don't look at Ray's first but still i was fairly surprised it came out like this.
https://www.flickr.com/photos/803366...n/photostream/

M8 was even less with the clouds making a run for my view
https://www.flickr.com/photos/803366...n/photostream/

the noise was quite bad in the last two for obvious reasons.

anyway looking forward to pressing the button on a new mono (after umming and ahhing over a cooled DSLR going with mono) hoping I'll be right to rumble come new moon

Clear skies,

Rusty
Attached Thumbnails
Click for full-size image (14167021549_34fd1c42a7_c.jpg)
73.7 KB75 views
Click for full-size image (14355207314_e587c751ca_c.jpg)
89.3 KB73 views
Click for full-size image (14167104588_3e01f74088_b.jpeg)
147.5 KB77 views
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 13-06-2014, 10:17 PM
Shiraz's Avatar
Shiraz (Ray)
Registered User

Shiraz is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: ardrossan south australia
Posts: 4,918
crikey they are good images - impressive result for a goto Dob
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 14-06-2014, 09:58 AM
Asterix2020's Avatar
Asterix2020 (Paul)
Registered User

Asterix2020 is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: Delaneys Creek, Qld
Posts: 184
Rusty,
Why did you decide to go with the mono CCD rather than cooled DSLR?
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 15-06-2014, 10:33 AM
rustigsmed's Avatar
rustigsmed (Russell)
Registered User

rustigsmed is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Mornington Peninsula, Australia
Posts: 3,997
Thanks for the kind comments Ray.

Hi Paul, yes been changing my mind constantly but predominantly for the extra resolution. I think I have found a relatively cost effective way to go mono (the expense was the other factor). Either buy a qhy9 or atik 383l and use a 36mm slide draw for filters rather than a filter wheel. That means I can use my existing OAG , lodestar and even coma corrector too (mpcc) which would've needed to be changed to a RCCI or similar with more 'distance'.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 15-06-2014, 12:44 PM
gregbradley's Avatar
gregbradley
Registered User

gregbradley is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Sydney
Posts: 18,183
Nice images Russell. I imagine getting round stars through a Dob would be challenging.

Greg.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 17-06-2014, 03:59 PM
rustigsmed's Avatar
rustigsmed (Russell)
Registered User

rustigsmed is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Mornington Peninsula, Australia
Posts: 3,997
thanks Greg,

definitely not an ideal setup - you have to kind of take what you get - would've loved a few more hours of clear weather however.

cheers
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 17-06-2014, 05:21 PM
alistairsam's Avatar
alistairsam
Registered User

alistairsam is offline
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Box Hill North, Vic
Posts: 1,838
Quote:
Originally Posted by rustigsmed View Post
Thanks for the kind comments Ray.

Hi Paul, yes been changing my mind constantly but predominantly for the extra resolution. I think I have found a relatively cost effective way to go mono (the expense was the other factor). Either buy a qhy9 or atik 383l and use a 36mm slide draw for filters rather than a filter wheel. That means I can use my existing OAG , lodestar and even coma corrector too (mpcc) which would've needed to be changed to a RCCI or similar with more 'distance'.
Looks good Russell,

have you looked that SX mini wheel? it has an OAG built in so saves heaps of back focus. USB control for the filter wheel is very handy.
I had a mono, SX 7 position wheel, TS OAG and all fit in the 55mm for the mpcc. so doable.


Cheers
Alistair
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 18-06-2014, 10:24 AM
rustigsmed's Avatar
rustigsmed (Russell)
Registered User

rustigsmed is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Mornington Peninsula, Australia
Posts: 3,997
Quote:
Originally Posted by alistairsam View Post
Looks good Russell,

have you looked that SX mini wheel? it has an OAG built in so saves heaps of back focus. USB control for the filter wheel is very handy.
I had a mono, SX 7 position wheel, TS OAG and all fit in the 55mm for the mpcc. so doable.


Cheers
Alistair
Hi Alistair,

My thoughts are the mini wheel would work (@ 5x 36mm) but with the SX7 the sensor distance added up to around ~60mm
17.5mm atik383/ 33mm(?) SXusb7 / TSOAG9 9mm ... 59.5mm? +2.5mm if i get a QHY9. Maybe the 8300m has a shorter sensor distance to opening or i have something wrong with my calcs?

Rusty
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 18-06-2014, 10:32 AM
alistairsam's Avatar
alistairsam
Registered User

alistairsam is offline
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Box Hill North, Vic
Posts: 1,838
Hi

My stf8300 is 17mm including threads, the sx7 is 25mm +2 for threads and TS9oag is 9 +2

So 17+27+11=55
I use the mpccmk3 and the m48 thread. So distance required is 58 I think. But this combo works well with round stars in an f4

SX USB wheel http://www.sxccd.com/images/products..._side_view.jpg

Cheers
Alistair

Last edited by alistairsam; 18-06-2014 at 10:54 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 18-06-2014, 11:13 AM
rustigsmed's Avatar
rustigsmed (Russell)
Registered User

rustigsmed is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Mornington Peninsula, Australia
Posts: 3,997
thats useful thanks Alistair i guess that means the 383L and QHY9 would work.

thanks

Rusty


Quote:
Originally Posted by alistairsam View Post
Hi

My stf8300 is 17mm including threads, the sx7 is 25mm +2 for threads and TS9oag is 9 +2

So 17+27+11=55
I use the mpccmk3 and the m48 thread. So distance required is 58 I think. But this combo works well with round stars in an f4

SX USB wheel http://www.sxccd.com/images/products..._side_view.jpg

Cheers
Alistair
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +10. The time is now 02:12 AM.

Powered by vBulletin Version 3.8.7 | Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Advertisement
Astrophotography Prize
Advertisement
Bintel
Advertisement