Go Back   IceInSpace > Equipment > Eyepieces, Barlows and Filters
Register FAQ Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread
  #1  
Old 10-03-2014, 02:01 PM
Astro_Bot's Avatar
Astro_Bot
Registered User

Astro_Bot is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Brisbane
Posts: 1,605
2.5x Powermate for Planetary Shots?

I'd like to increase the resolution I can get for planetary photography. At the moment, I'm limited to 2500mm and f/10 with my Meade LX200-ACF 10". I use a Canon 600d for imaging.

According to what I've read (here and some other advice), my 'scope and camera ought to be able to support an f-number of 21.5 or thereabouts, though some seem to be able to push that on major planets so I figure about f/25 would be a good target (and the 2.5x Powermate is cheaper than the 2x).

Q1. Has anyone had problems with the TeleVue 2.5x Powermate (1.25") (including T-ring adapter) for imaging?

Q2. If I later upgrade the camera to a QHY5II-L or ASI120MM, will the higher pixel density be too much of a stretch with the 2.5x Powermate (since f/19 will then be the "ideal" f-number according to the formula) or is there enough latitude that it'll work OK?

Any other relevant advice will be warmly appreciated.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 10-03-2014, 02:36 PM
Merlin66's Avatar
Merlin66 (Ken)
Registered User

Merlin66 is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Junortoun Vic
Posts: 8,927
f25 to f30 for planetary is good.
I use the x2.5 PM with the T thread adaptor and a DMK41/51 for solar imaging.
Works very well.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 10-03-2014, 03:37 PM
Amaranthus's Avatar
Amaranthus (Barry)
Thylacinus stargazoculus

Amaranthus is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: Judbury, Tasmania
Posts: 1,203
It works nicely for me -- the PM x2.5 goes in by default when I use my Neximage 5.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 10-03-2014, 11:26 PM
pdalek's Avatar
pdalek (Patrick)
Registered User

pdalek is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 112
I have both Powermates and standard barlows.
I find the latter to be far more useful for planetary imaging. The power can be tuned over a good range by adjusting the barlow - camera spacing. The optimum depends on several factors, one being camera pixel size.
The Powermates do not give higher image quality than TeleVue barlows in this application as far as I can measure.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 11-03-2014, 08:12 AM
Rigel003's Avatar
Rigel003 (Graeme)
Registered User

Rigel003 is offline
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Adelaide, South Australia
Posts: 1,082
You might like to be aware of a peculiarity of the 2.5x Powermate. With all barlows and most powermates the image scale increases as you increase the distance between it and the sensor. With the 2.5" the image scale actually decreases slightly with distance. There are graphs showing this on the Televue pages.
http://www.televue.com/engine/TV3b_p...p#.Ux4qbueSyrM

Having said that, I've used the 2.5" happily on my 11" SCT.

Last edited by Rigel003; 11-03-2014 at 10:23 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 11-03-2014, 02:49 PM
Astro_Bot's Avatar
Astro_Bot
Registered User

Astro_Bot is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Brisbane
Posts: 1,605
Thanks for that advice. Very much appreciated ... can you feel the warmth?*



* Although feeling somebody's warmth could get you locked up in some parts.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 12-03-2014, 05:50 PM
icytailmark (Mark)
Registered User

icytailmark is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: sydney australia
Posts: 832
i use 2.5 powermate when the conditions are fair to good, and 5x when the conditions are excellent which is very rare in sydney lol
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +10. The time is now 08:51 AM.

Powered by vBulletin Version 3.8.7 | Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Advertisement
Bintel
Advertisement