Go Back   IceInSpace > Images > Deep Space
Register FAQ Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread
  #1  
Old 05-03-2014, 01:59 PM
kosh
Registered User

kosh is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 331
Two Eta Carina nebula Shots for comparison

Hi all,
I know its a fairly easy target, but I just modded my Canon 1000D and wanted to test it out using my 8" F4 Newt and the little ED80.
Which one do you guys think is better?
Also, anyone know why I have double diffraction spikes with the Newt?

Image 1 (Newt ) : 20 x 120 sec subs iso400, 10 Darks modded 1000D
Image 2 ( ED80 ) : 10 x 180secs subs iso400, 10 darks, modded 1000D

Both images guided.

Thanks for looking.
Attached Thumbnails
Click for full-size image (Carinae_edit_8Newt_web.jpg)
227.9 KB56 views
Click for full-size image (Carina_done_ED80_web.jpg)
222.9 KB50 views
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 05-03-2014, 02:16 PM
IanP
Registered User

IanP is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: West Coast
Posts: 787
My vote goes to ED80 ..
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 05-03-2014, 02:20 PM
Andy01's Avatar
Andy01 (Andy)
My God it's full of stars

Andy01 is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 3,279
ditto on the refractor
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 05-03-2014, 02:38 PM
alpal's Avatar
alpal
Registered User

alpal is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 3,786
Hi Kosh,
The double diffraction spikes are caused by being out of focus.
You really need a coma corrector for that Newt.
The refractor has come out a lot better.

cheers
Allan
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 05-03-2014, 04:00 PM
kosh
Registered User

kosh is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 331
Quote:
Originally Posted by IanP View Post
My vote goes to ED80 ..
Quote:
Originally Posted by Andy01 View Post
ditto on the refractor
Yeah me too. Maybe a reprocessing of the newt image will help. Its a little blown out at the bright bit.
Quote:
Originally Posted by alpal View Post
Hi Kosh,
The double diffraction spikes are caused by being out of focus.
You really need a coma corrector for that Newt.
The refractor has come out a lot better.

cheers
Allan
Thanks allan. I already use a baader mpcc mk3. I'm not really getting as much help from it as I had hoped. Could something else be going wrong there?
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 05-03-2014, 06:59 PM
alpal's Avatar
alpal
Registered User

alpal is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 3,786
Quote:
Originally Posted by kosh View Post
Thanks allan. I already use a baader mpcc mk3. I'm not really getting as much help from it as I had hoped. Could something else be going wrong there?

Hi Kosh,
The coma corrector has to be exactly the right distance to the camera chip
in order to work properly.
I had an MPCC on my old DSLR setup & was never able to adjust it.
The distance was too short when using an OAG.
I don't have that problem with my CCD camera as I have an RCC corrector
which gives plenty of back focus & also a Varilock adjuster to get the right distance.

Maybe someone else can advise?

cheers
Allan
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 05-03-2014, 10:17 PM
kosh
Registered User

kosh is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 331
Quote:
Originally Posted by alpal View Post
Hi Kosh,
The coma corrector has to be exactly the right distance to the camera chip
in order to work properly.
I had an MPCC on my old DSLR setup & was never able to adjust it.
The distance was too short when using an OAG.
I don't have that problem with my CCD camera as I have an RCC corrector
which gives plenty of back focus & also a Varilock adjuster to get the right distance.

Maybe someone else can advise?

cheers
Allan
Allan, I think you are right. I have a small spacer in between the corrector and the DSLR to give me some extra back focus. I didn't realise that the distance between the corrector and the DSLR sensor had to be 55mm. How embarrassing
I hope your suggestion works, it's an easy fix.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 05-03-2014, 10:24 PM
alpal's Avatar
alpal
Registered User

alpal is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 3,786
Quote:
Originally Posted by kosh View Post
Allan, I think you are right. I have a small spacer in between the corrector and the DSLR to give me some extra back focus. I didn't realise that the distance between the corrector and the DSLR sensor had to be 55mm. How embarrassing
I hope your suggestion works, it's an easy fix.

Hi Kosh,
That's good but it's not that easy -
the distance of 55mm is recommended but will change by ± 1 mm
or maybe more - depending on your scope.
That allows the MPCC to correct for different f ratios.
You may need a set of spacers to try.

cheers
Allan
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +10. The time is now 05:14 PM.

Powered by vBulletin Version 3.8.7 | Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Advertisement
Bintel
Advertisement
Astrophotography Prize
Advertisement