Go Back   IceInSpace > Equipment > Equipment Discussions
Register FAQ Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread
  #1  
Old 03-03-2014, 02:36 PM
Amaranthus's Avatar
Amaranthus (Barry)
Thylacinus stargazoculus

Amaranthus is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: Judbury, Tasmania
Posts: 1,203
LXD75 mount - opinions?

So, I'm thinking of purchasing a Meade LXD75 EQ Mount with Autostar, to use with my SCT (Nexstar 8SE) and 120mm frac for astrophotography. (There is one currently on sale 2nd hand locally that I could pick up).

Any opinions from current or past owners on its performance, especially as a stable mount for long-exposure AP?
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 04-03-2014, 01:11 PM
Amaranthus's Avatar
Amaranthus (Barry)
Thylacinus stargazoculus

Amaranthus is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: Judbury, Tasmania
Posts: 1,203
Bump - no views? I'm thinking I should probably save my pennies and get a HEQ5 or a NEQ6 to give more stability and upgrade options, but the LXD75 is going at a decent price...
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 04-03-2014, 01:30 PM
Bart's Avatar
Bart
Don't have a cow, Man!

Bart is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: Adelaide, South Australia
Posts: 1,116
The LXD75 was cursed because of the LXD55 and its crappy build quality. I believe the 75 has bearings instead of bushes which would be ok for beginner astrophoto work if tuned and aligned properly. If you want to get long term reliability, go for an EQ6.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 04-03-2014, 03:31 PM
h0ughy's Avatar
h0ughy (David)
Moderator

h0ughy is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: NEWCASTLE NSW Australia
Posts: 33,425
Quote:
Originally Posted by Amaranthus View Post
Bump - no views? I'm thinking I should probably save my pennies and get a HEQ5 or a NEQ6 to give more stability and upgrade options, but the LXD75 is going at a decent price...
get the eq6
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 04-03-2014, 03:35 PM
Amaranthus's Avatar
Amaranthus (Barry)
Thylacinus stargazoculus

Amaranthus is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: Judbury, Tasmania
Posts: 1,203
Thanks for the advice both -- I think you've reinforced my suspicion. I'll wait, save, and do more research on mounts, and probably end up getting a really solid EQ6 when the time is ripe.

For now, I'll continue to muck about with my sub 30 sec exposures using my fork mount (about the most I can get away with before field rotation becomes a pain).
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 04-03-2014, 04:01 PM
nebulosity.'s Avatar
nebulosity. (Jo)
Registered User

nebulosity. is offline
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Cecil Plains QLD
Posts: 1,228
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bart View Post
go for an EQ6.
Quote:
Originally Posted by h0ughy View Post
get the eq6
Actually I'd get an iOptron IEQ45.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 04-03-2014, 04:07 PM
Camelopardalis's Avatar
Camelopardalis (Dunk)
Drifting from the pole

Camelopardalis is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Brisbane
Posts: 5,476
EQ6 chaps? Is it really that decent or just a factor of handling the PEC?
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 04-03-2014, 04:22 PM
acropolite's Avatar
acropolite (Phil)
Registered User

acropolite is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Launceston Tasmania
Posts: 9,021
Quote:
get the eq6
Correct, but better still spend a little extra and get the Az-Eq6 it has belt drive and encoders, plus should you wish to do so it can be configured in Alt/Az mode.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 04-03-2014, 05:22 PM
Camelopardalis's Avatar
Camelopardalis (Dunk)
Drifting from the pole

Camelopardalis is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Brisbane
Posts: 5,476
Barry, I'd recommend the Celestron VX for visual and planetary photography with your C8, as you've got a Nexstar you'd feel at home and it's a lot lighter than the EQ6, although no doubts that the 6 would be more sturdy (the tripods are practically the same though).

Not sure how it'd fare with the 120 though...is it bigger/heavier than the C8?

Might as well scrub that thought, it's not much cheaper than the EQ6

Last edited by Camelopardalis; 04-03-2014 at 07:02 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 04-03-2014, 05:41 PM
Amaranthus's Avatar
Amaranthus (Barry)
Thylacinus stargazoculus

Amaranthus is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: Judbury, Tasmania
Posts: 1,203
The SW120 OTA is a bit lighter than the C8 - about 4 kg vs 5.5 kg.
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 04-03-2014, 05:42 PM
Logieberra's Avatar
Logieberra (Logan)
Registered User

Logieberra is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Canberra
Posts: 1,644
NEQ6 Pro all day long!
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 04-03-2014, 05:44 PM
Logieberra's Avatar
Logieberra (Logan)
Registered User

Logieberra is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Canberra
Posts: 1,644
[QUOTE=acropolite;1062691]Correct, but better still spend a little extra and get the Az-Eq6 it has belt drive and encoders, plus should you wish to do so it can be configured in Alt/Az mode.[/QUOTE

This sounds nice too! How are they on periodic error compared to the traditional NEQ6 Pro gear setup?
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +10. The time is now 02:38 PM.

Powered by vBulletin Version 3.8.7 | Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Advertisement
Bintel
Advertisement