Go Back   IceInSpace > Equipment > Software and Computers
Register FAQ Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread
  #1  
Old 01-11-2013, 11:28 AM
John K's Avatar
John K
Registered User

John K is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 1,481
PHD Settings with OAG and Lodestar

Hi guys,

I had my first go at using my Lodestar guider with an OAG last night but could not get tracking accuracy at all.

I am wondering whether in terms of PHD settings there is a correlation in settings for a specific mount when comparing the focal length that the guiding is done at.

So far, I have been using an 80mm f3.7 300mm fl. short focus refractor to guide with, but even though the graphs on PHD look perfect, smaller stars are never perfectly round and I am getting some flex in the system as well. I am shooting with a 12.5" f/5 reflector and a DSLR.

The setting that seem to work on my mount with the 80mm short focus refractor are as follows:

Drive set to x0.5x
RA Agress: 78
Ra Hys: 48
Min Motion: 0.05 pixels
Mx Ra: 815
Mx Dec: 102
Avoid switching in Dec
Caligration: 1500

So the question now is, if I use the OAG, but guide at like 1500 mm f.l., what should my settings in PHD change to?

I tried all types of settings last night but for the life of me could not get an kind of accurate tracking!! Very frustrating as there is great potential here!

I would like to move to the OAG as the Lodestar is super sensitive and guidestars are not an issue and this will remove the flex issues I am having.

Any suggestions really welcome!

Clear skies.

John K.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 01-11-2013, 11:33 AM
Merlin66's Avatar
Merlin66 (Ken)
Registered User

Merlin66 is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Junortoun Vic
Posts: 8,927
John,
I use a version of an OAG (reflective slit guiding) on my C11 at f10 with a Lodestar guide camera...
I'll double check the settings I use on PHD 1.13, but I'm almost sure I just use the defaults....
Good adaptor connections (Threaded parts given a smear of boot polish!) and good balance I think are the key....
If I find the settings are different, I'll edit this post.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 01-11-2013, 04:46 PM
White Rabbit's Avatar
White Rabbit
Space Cadet

White Rabbit is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Sydney
Posts: 1,411
I'm no expert but your RA Hys seem to be very heavy handed. I dont use an OAG but mine are set to under 10.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 03-11-2013, 03:38 PM
John K's Avatar
John K
Registered User

John K is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 1,481
Thanks for the info guys.

I lowered the calibration to between 300 and 500 and all else was left the same.

Have now been able to get 5 min subs no probs!

Very happy.

John K.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 05-11-2013, 07:33 AM
White Rabbit's Avatar
White Rabbit
Space Cadet

White Rabbit is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Sydney
Posts: 1,411
That's weird that your calibration would have an effect on your guiding accuracy. Like I said I'm no expert but I though calibration only tells the software what angle your camera is? Shouldn't effect your accuracy.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +10. The time is now 08:50 PM.

Powered by vBulletin Version 3.8.7 | Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Advertisement
Astrophotography Prize
Advertisement
Bintel
Advertisement