Go Back   IceInSpace > Equipment > Equipment Discussions
Register FAQ Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread
  #1  
Old 30-06-2006, 01:40 AM
Adrian-H
Naturalist

Adrian-H is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Earth
Posts: 321
APO or LX200R

its allmost time for me to get an OTA, i would like to get one to start
eather a 80mm APO or LX200R 8"

i will be using this with my hutech 350d, i dont have money growing off me, but i certainly have the passion to go onwards with astrophotography.

options with the apo is the Orion ED80 allthough i would like a better focuser, ive been looking at the new meade apo, but personally i have no idea and i dont know anyone who dose!

in my mind i am swaying more towards a low FL APO, because, it seems easyer path and my knowledge of lx200r lacks!

The Question is which one First?

Any suggestions, or anyone want to convince me to buy a lx200r 8" before a low FL APO?

Last edited by Adrian-H; 30-06-2006 at 04:22 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 30-06-2006, 07:31 AM
astroboy's Avatar
astroboy
Registered User

astroboy is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Lake Bathurst NSW
Posts: 702
Hi Adrian
I think your on the right track with considering a small APO as a first imaging scope , the longer the focal length the more difficult it is to guide and with the 200R being very slow ( F10 ) makes for very long exposures.
You could look at some of the William Optics scopes that have great optics and nice 10/1 geared focusers.

But probably the most important thing is a good mount some thing like a HEQ5 or EQ6 sound good although may need some tinkering to get them peforming at there best and could handle a bigger ota latter on.
Whatever your budget spend most of it on the mount and you will have more luck with your imaging.

Thanks
Zane
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 30-06-2006, 08:35 AM
[1ponders]'s Avatar
[1ponders] (Paul)
Retired, damn no pension

[1ponders] is offline
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Obi Obi, Qld
Posts: 18,778
Mount, Mount, Mount!!! Then the Orion and a small cheap refractor, rings and barlow for a guidescope. Once you have exhausted the possibilities of that set up in about 50 years then it could be time to think about upgrading.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 30-06-2006, 12:00 PM
Striker's Avatar
Striker (Tony)
Whats visual Astronomy

Striker is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Brisbane
Posts: 5,062
The 80ED is a great scope to start with and later on you can use at as a guide scope for your massive 16"RC on the paromount ME mount....lol

If you start imaging with the 8" LX200r your going to need guiding and a nice accurate mount....with the ED80 you can get away with a lot more before you need to guide.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 30-06-2006, 03:11 PM
Robert_T's Avatar
Robert_T
aiming for 2nd Halley's

Robert_T is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Australia
Posts: 2,959
go the little apo, they look to do amazing things and likley to be a lot less frustrating...
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 30-06-2006, 06:57 PM
gbeal
Registered User

gbeal is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: New Zealand
Posts: 4,346
80mm for me as well, but try to get the Flourite one(s).
And if the budget is real tight, look at Daves EQ5 in the Sellit section. Not a Losmandy, but at the price a steal.
Ultimately though the bug will bite real hard, and you will need a real good mount, but what has been suggested will set the hook.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 30-06-2006, 07:50 PM
xelasnave's Avatar
xelasnave
Gravity does not Suck

xelasnave is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Tabulam
Posts: 17,003
Mount is so important, does not matter what scope if the mount really works, but believe me and the others an 80 is the go, 80 triple on a good mount produces shots like you wont believe.. I find wide field very satisfying because it makes my mount perfect it is fun and I get satisfying results, well they are done with the standard canon 300d lens.. you could do worst than a good mount, guide scope/capture scope (80mm) and only the camera. I found one can get a 200mm or 300mm lens for the canon under $400 maybe you already have a 300 lens if you got the 350 + lens pak.
What people dont say about the mount is the slightess imperfection ruins a photo I used to think it was over the top but its simply a no compromise necessity. If I could sell all and start again it would be exactly as suggested here.
alex
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 01-07-2006, 06:39 AM
Adrian-H
Naturalist

Adrian-H is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Earth
Posts: 321
yeah i will go for a apo like my orginal idea's and just focus on geting imaging underway, thank you all for your helpfull suggestions.

i like the look of the williams optics and the focusers on them are nice, how well do the wiliams optics megrez fluorite and zenithstar perform, compared to the Orion ED80? that zenith star looks small

I have another question to bring up? which software for the dslr? from my researching, my mind sways towards ImagesPlus.

how will i go about buying a modified shutter release cable for DSLR to PC, or i can just make one myself with alittle guidance?

any suggestions here in this department!

Thanks!

i would probly put the 12" newt on the paramout to start!

Last edited by Adrian-H; 01-07-2006 at 07:01 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 01-07-2006, 07:18 AM
astroboy's Avatar
astroboy
Registered User

astroboy is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Lake Bathurst NSW
Posts: 702
Hi Adrian
The williams triplets seem to be excellent had a guest here with the 105 F7 triplet and said it was better than his old Tak FS102 and olny costs $2.5K , further down the track you may want to get a good field flatener / reducer for which ever scope you choose.
I guess its where the usual 80mm F7.5 Apos end up costing more than you think people often upgrade the focuser and buy a reducer/flatener and that will about double the cost , depending on the quality of couse.
I think its called Haps cables for the DSLR to serial cable OPT sell them and Images Plus seems to have a good following.
Do you already have a mount?

Zane
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 01-07-2006, 08:04 AM
Adrian-H
Naturalist

Adrian-H is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Earth
Posts: 321
yeah, a heq5
i would probly rather just go 80mm around 1k, its probly best if i try not to spend to much
i may as well just get the 80ED

Last edited by Adrian-H; 05-07-2006 at 02:54 PM.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +10. The time is now 11:40 AM.

Powered by vBulletin Version 3.8.7 | Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Advertisement
Bintel
Advertisement
Astrophotography Prize
Advertisement