Go Back   IceInSpace > General Astronomy > General Chat
Register FAQ Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread
  #1  
Old 18-07-2013, 07:23 PM
Hans Tucker (Hans)
Registered User

Hans Tucker is offline
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 2,476
Curiosity Mars Rover Passes Kilometer of Driving

Ok...a big deal is made a IIS when a member reaches his/her 1000 post. Lets hear it for Curiosity reaching the 1km (1000 metres).


http://www.jpl.nasa.gov/news/news.ph...s.xml&rst=3851
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 18-07-2013, 09:43 PM
TrevorW
Registered User

TrevorW is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Western Australia
Posts: 8,278
Whoa 1klm how long has it been up there now ????
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 18-07-2013, 10:48 PM
Hans Tucker (Hans)
Registered User

Hans Tucker is offline
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 2,476
Quote:
Originally Posted by TrevorW View Post
Whoa 1klm how long has it been up there now ????
Landed in August 2012, so it has covered 1km in less than a year.

Opportunity on the other hand has been on the Mars surface for 10 years this month and covered 7,730.50 meters (4.80 miles).
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 19-07-2013, 02:16 AM
Ric's Avatar
Ric
Support your local RFS

Ric is offline
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Wamboin NSW
Posts: 12,405
Lots to see up there.

I suppose the scientist's don't want to go racing around and miss something important.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 19-07-2013, 07:57 AM
TrevorW
Registered User

TrevorW is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Western Australia
Posts: 8,278
I don't want to sound cynical but you do realize that is slower than a garden snail.

Mar's is a big place and it's going to miss a lot in my opinion by being so slow as it restricts it's exploration to a small region of the planet.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 19-07-2013, 09:39 AM
SkyViking's Avatar
SkyViking (Rolf)
Registered User

SkyViking is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Waitakere Ranges, New Zealand
Posts: 2,260
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hans Tucker View Post
Landed in August 2012, so it has covered 1km in less than a year.

Opportunity on the other hand has been on the Mars surface for 10 years this month and covered 7,730.50 meters (4.80 miles).
Opportunity passed 7km years ago. It was launched 10 years ago but has only been roving the surface for 9 years and a bit. And it has currently travelled a whopping 35.76 km
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 19-07-2013, 09:50 AM
jjjnettie's Avatar
jjjnettie (Jeanette)
Registered User

jjjnettie is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Monto
Posts: 16,741
Good on her. I can't wait to see what else she'll be showing us.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 19-07-2013, 03:39 PM
leon's Avatar
leon
Registered User

leon is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Warrnambool
Posts: 12,800
Wow, that sure is slow, but i suppose exploration dose take time.

Leon
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 19-07-2013, 06:47 PM
Hans Tucker (Hans)
Registered User

Hans Tucker is offline
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 2,476
Quote:
Originally Posted by leon View Post
Wow, that sure is slow, but i suppose exploration dose take time.

Leon
It takes time for the rover team to gain spatial awareness of where the rover is and the terrain around it. Then it has to plan the martian day (Sol) roving activity send the commands to the Mars Reconnaissance Orbiter (MRO) and then the orbiter has to transmit the commands to the rover below. The rover in turn has to transmit data back to JPL MSL for the rover team to plan future roving activities. The delay is in the Tx/Rx/Tx

http://marsrovers.jpl.nasa.gov/missi...rface_nav.html

Maybe as Robotics software evolves future rovers can just go roving on their own.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 20-07-2013, 09:31 PM
TrevorW
Registered User

TrevorW is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Western Australia
Posts: 8,278
Maybe they should have given it some semi autonomous ability when you consider that the surface area of Mars is 144,798,500 km it's going to be long dead before any significant area is explored. Ok the geeks will say it's $2.5 billion dollars well spent but I have my doubts. I think it will end up being nothing more than a curiosity.

Last edited by TrevorW; 21-07-2013 at 08:35 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 20-07-2013, 09:43 PM
Hans Tucker (Hans)
Registered User

Hans Tucker is offline
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 2,476
Quote:
Originally Posted by TrevorW View Post
Maybe they should have given it some semi autonomous ability when you consider that the surace area of Mars is 144,798,500 km it's going to be long dead before any significant area is explored. Ok the geeks will say it's $2.5 billion dollars well spent but I have my doubts. I think it will end up being nothing more than a curiosity.
Opinions on exploring dead planets aside the investment in Robotic technology is invaluable. It's a shame that critics of these programs don't think of the spin-offs.
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 21-07-2013, 08:39 AM
TrevorW
Registered User

TrevorW is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Western Australia
Posts: 8,278
Hans I beg to differ, robots currently being built today and even before the Curiosity have and will surpass it's ability. It's the old case of

"what $10000 for a toilet seat", yes I do think of the spin offs but a lot of beneficial technology is being developed and delivered outside the space industry today and in the future primarily due to the fact that the space industry is relatively dormant at the moment.

Lets just say we beg to differ, although it may seem it I'm not against space exploration.

Last edited by TrevorW; 22-07-2013 at 10:41 AM.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +10. The time is now 08:08 AM.

Powered by vBulletin Version 3.8.7 | Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Advertisement
Bintel
Advertisement