Go Back   IceInSpace > General Astronomy > Astronomy and Amateur Science
Register FAQ Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread
  #1  
Old 15-06-2006, 09:01 AM
sheeny's Avatar
sheeny (Al)
Spam Hunter

sheeny is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Oberon NSW
Posts: 14,437
Accretion of the Earth and Segregation of its Core

The following is from Nature Contents this morning.

Al.

Accretion of the Earth and segregation of its core

Bernard J. Wood1, Michael J. Walter2 and Jonathan Wade2
Top of page Abstract

The Earth took 30–40 million years to accrete from smaller 'planetesimals'. Many of these planetesimals had metallic iron cores and during growth of the Earth this metal re-equilibrated with the Earth's silicate mantle, extracting siderophile ('iron-loving') elements into the Earth's iron-rich core. The current composition of the mantle indicates that much of the re-equilibration took place in a deep (> 400 km) molten silicate layer, or 'magma ocean', and that conditions became more oxidizing with time as the Earth grew. The high-pressure nature of the core-forming process led to the Earth's core being richer in low-atomic-number elements, notably silicon and possibly oxygen, than the cores of the smaller planetesimal building blocks.

Editor's Summary

15 June 2006
To the centre of the Earth

Observations of newly formed stars suggest that the Sun's planetary system began life as a flat disk of gas and dust that quickly (in about 100,000 years) accreted to form planetesimals about 10 km in diameter. The Earth was then formed by accretion of planetesimals in a process taking 30–40 million years. Wood et al. review recent work on the nature of the accretion process, and how the Earth developed an iron-rich molten core richer in low-atomic-number elements than the planetesimal building blocks.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 15-06-2006, 09:08 AM
iceman's Avatar
iceman (Mike)
Sir Post a Lot!

iceman is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Gosford, NSW, Australia
Posts: 36,799
Thanks Al, amazing stuff to think about.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 15-06-2006, 09:28 AM
[1ponders]'s Avatar
[1ponders] (Paul)
Retired, damn no pension

[1ponders] is offline
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Obi Obi, Qld
Posts: 18,778
Thanks Al

This will be interesting to follow as the current theory says that the differentiation in the early molten period of the planets development caused the core to be "low in lighter than iron" compared to the crust and mantle areas.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 15-06-2006, 03:37 PM
sheeny's Avatar
sheeny (Al)
Spam Hunter

sheeny is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Oberon NSW
Posts: 14,437
Yes, it does seem to be contrary to the traditional theory (at least as I remember it! ). Its interesting to follow the to-ing and fro-ing of scientific method!

Al.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +10. The time is now 03:31 AM.

Powered by vBulletin Version 3.8.7 | Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Advertisement
Bintel
Advertisement