Go Back   IceInSpace > Beginners Start Here > Beginners Astrophotography
Register FAQ Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread
  #1  
Old 20-05-2013, 01:33 PM
DavidNg's Avatar
DavidNg (David)
Registered User

DavidNg is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Sydney
Posts: 341
NGC 6357 in HA

Hi again,

Here are 2 versions of processing NGC 6357, which I captured last night. The image composes of 45x10min in HA. Both were processed in PI, first image was my usual simple way: calibration, registration, integration, histrogramtransformation, deconvolution, and morphologicaltranformation; all took about 20 minutes. Second image was processed following instruction from PixInsight workflow example from their website, more fancy stuffs. I spent about 3 hours on this. Both were then minor adjusted with PS.

Please tell which one would you like or prefer.

Thanks for looking
David
Attached Thumbnails
Click for full-size image (PI_myway_PS_33.jpg)
189.9 KB25 views
Click for full-size image (PI_inst_PS_34.jpg)
194.6 KB25 views

Last edited by DavidNg; 20-05-2013 at 01:35 PM. Reason: Forgot to attach files
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 20-05-2013, 01:58 PM
lazjen's Avatar
lazjen (Chris)
PI cult member

lazjen is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Flaxton, Qld
Posts: 2,075
For me, I prefer the second one, but the first is fine too.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 20-05-2013, 03:08 PM
Joshua Bunn's Avatar
Joshua Bunn (Joshua)
Registered User

Joshua Bunn is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Albany, Western Australia
Posts: 1,486
second one is a little sharper for me, but both are great.

Josh
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 20-05-2013, 03:19 PM
RickS's Avatar
RickS (Rick)
PI cult recruiter

RickS is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Brisbane
Posts: 10,584
Nice work! The second one looks more detailed.

FYI, deconvolution is supposed to be done on a linear image. Doing this before the HT stretch may have improved the first version?

Cheers,
Rick.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 20-05-2013, 03:47 PM
DavidNg's Avatar
DavidNg (David)
Registered User

DavidNg is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Sydney
Posts: 341
Quote:
Originally Posted by RickS View Post
Nice work! The second one looks more detailed.

FYI, deconvolution is supposed to be done on a linear image. Doing this before the HT stretch may have improved the first version?

Cheers,
Rick.
Hi RickS, Thank you for letting me know. The second image involves masking, PixMath, etc quite a daunting task, glad that it looks better. Should I do other transformation before HT stretch as well?

Regards
David
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 20-05-2013, 03:48 PM
DavidNg's Avatar
DavidNg (David)
Registered User

DavidNg is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Sydney
Posts: 341
Quote:
Originally Posted by Joshua Bunn View Post
second one is a little sharper for me, but both are great.

Josh
Thanks for letting me know Joshua
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 20-05-2013, 03:48 PM
DavidNg's Avatar
DavidNg (David)
Registered User

DavidNg is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Sydney
Posts: 341
Quote:
Originally Posted by lazjen View Post
For me, I prefer the second one, but the first is fine too.
Thanks Chris
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 20-05-2013, 04:08 PM
RickS's Avatar
RickS (Rick)
PI cult recruiter

RickS is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Brisbane
Posts: 10,584
Quote:
Originally Posted by DavidNg View Post
Hi RickS, Thank you for letting me know. The second image involves masking, PixMath, etc quite a daunting task, glad that it looks better. Should I do other transformation before HT stretch as well?

Regards
David
David,

After a while the complex stuff becomes easier

The main things you need to do before stretching are deconvolution, DBE gradient correction and colour calibration. It isn't strictly necessary to use DBE on linear data but it tends to work better.

Cheers,
Rick.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 21-05-2013, 10:16 PM
DavidNg's Avatar
DavidNg (David)
Registered User

DavidNg is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Sydney
Posts: 341
Thank you Rick for your advice. I found so far PI is complex, but very user friendly. Love the clone tool.
Regards
David
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +10. The time is now 12:53 PM.

Powered by vBulletin Version 3.8.7 | Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Advertisement
Bintel
Advertisement