Go Back   IceInSpace > Images > Deep Space
Register FAQ Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread
  #1  
Old 18-04-2013, 07:16 AM
iceman's Avatar
iceman (Mike)
Sir Post a Lot!

iceman is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Gosford, NSW, Australia
Posts: 36,799
Crux, Coalsack, Eta - 5 min on the Polarie

I'm not sure about this one - I like it, but not sure if it's too busy.

In any case, it's a bit of an experiment because it's a single 5-minute exposure on the Polarie, with the Canon 6D and 50mm lens @ f/2.8, ISO3200.

I didn't use the polar scope, just the polar meter (great addition!) to align so I was pushing to see how far it would go without trails. Very impressed.

I took about 10 shots of 1-2 minute exposures, and will stack them later and see how they look. This was just to see how a single 5-min exposure goes.

Feedback welcome.
Attached Thumbnails
Click for full-size image (cruxeta-single5min-1369.jpg)
196.5 KB144 views
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 18-04-2013, 09:10 AM
h0ughy's Avatar
h0ughy (David)
Moderator

h0ughy is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: NEWCASTLE NSW Australia
Posts: 33,429
thats not a modded camera is it?
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 18-04-2013, 09:37 AM
iceman's Avatar
iceman (Mike)
Sir Post a Lot!

iceman is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Gosford, NSW, Australia
Posts: 36,799
Nope.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 18-04-2013, 04:35 PM
gregbradley's Avatar
gregbradley
Registered User

gregbradley is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Sydney
Posts: 18,185
I've done similar experiments Mike. My conclusion was too high an ISO blows it out too much and reduces dynamic range. ISO1600 or 800 may've given a different look here. High ISO seems good for short shots and lower ISO seems better in longer shots.
The highlights get blown out by the high ISO is the problem (low dynamic range).

Greg.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 18-04-2013, 04:49 PM
IanP
Registered User

IanP is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: West Coast
Posts: 787
My experience (60Da) is that the max time @ ISO 1600 is roughly 3min, I try not to set ISO above that ...
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 18-04-2013, 04:54 PM
iceman's Avatar
iceman (Mike)
Sir Post a Lot!

iceman is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Gosford, NSW, Australia
Posts: 36,799
Yeh I think you're right Greg.
This was ISO3200 and probably would've been better with longer exposures at a lower ISO.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 19-04-2013, 07:28 PM
gregbradley's Avatar
gregbradley
Registered User

gregbradley is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Sydney
Posts: 18,185
Quote:
Originally Posted by iceman View Post
Yeh I think you're right Greg.
This was ISO3200 and probably would've been better with longer exposures at a lower ISO.

Unless you can pull back the highlights in Canon DDP. Or perhaps highlights/shadows tool in PS.

Probably not because its been recorded like that but you never know.

Greg.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 19-04-2013, 09:03 PM
David Fitz-Henr's Avatar
David Fitz-Henr
Registered User

David Fitz-Henr is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Bowen Mountain
Posts: 837
Not too shabby Mike;it will be interesting to compare your stacked 1-2 min exposures. Taken at Lostock I assume? Sorry I couldn't make it this year, maybe next!
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 19-04-2013, 09:07 PM
Irish stargazer's Avatar
Irish stargazer (John)
Registered User

Irish stargazer is offline
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Brisbane
Posts: 690
Impressive tracking. I think I will order the polar meter.
So much detail visible.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +10. The time is now 11:52 AM.

Powered by vBulletin Version 3.8.7 | Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Advertisement
Bintel
Advertisement
Astrophotography Prize
Advertisement