Go Back   IceInSpace > Images > Deep Space
Register FAQ Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread
  #1  
Old 22-04-2013, 12:21 AM
Tandum's Avatar
Tandum (Robin)
Registered User

Tandum is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Wynnum West, Brisbane.
Posts: 4,166
2944

Got some Ha on 2944 and I'm a bit lost on how to process it, I thought it was really static (a chicken) but to me it looks like it's swirling around.

About 8 x 10 minute subs here.

12" newt, atik11002, oag qhy5L2.

More rainless nights required

[edit]
Backed the sharpening off a bit and uploaded a big version.
Attached Thumbnails
Click for full-size image (2944.jpg)
197.1 KB93 views
Click for full-size image (IC2944-Ha-Mrk2.jpg)
198.4 KB53 views

Last edited by Tandum; 22-04-2013 at 10:14 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 22-04-2013, 05:42 AM
gbeal
Registered User

gbeal is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: New Zealand
Posts: 4,346
Wow!!! Very nice Robin, and only 8x10 mins?? My goodness, great shot, the gear is working well.
Gary
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 22-04-2013, 08:58 AM
Ross G
Registered User

Ross G is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Cherrybrook, NSW
Posts: 5,013
Great monochrome photo Robin.

So much detail.

Ross.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 22-04-2013, 09:40 AM
multiweb's Avatar
multiweb (Marc)
ze frogginator

multiweb is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Sydney
Posts: 22,080
Looks pretty cool as is. Bigger res pic would be great to peek at.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 22-04-2013, 09:41 AM
Tandum's Avatar
Tandum (Robin)
Registered User

Tandum is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Wynnum West, Brisbane.
Posts: 4,166
Cheers, but sharpening looks a little heavy from this machine. I'll have another go.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 23-04-2013, 10:41 PM
RobF's Avatar
RobF (Rob)
Mostly harmless...

RobF is offline
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Brisbane, Australia
Posts: 5,735
Nice one Robin. Glad you posted a repro - that first chicken was bit overcooked! 2nd one nice and smooth. I'd like to have a swim around in it too and check out the detail on the bok globules - looks pretty damned good.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 24-04-2013, 01:23 AM
jase (Jason)
Registered User

jase is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Melbourne, Victoria
Posts: 3,916
2nd rendition is the fix. A solid image Robin. Well done.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 24-04-2013, 02:12 PM
Tandum's Avatar
Tandum (Robin)
Registered User

Tandum is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Wynnum West, Brisbane.
Posts: 4,166
Cheers Guys,
I just got the new codes for the dome driver so I can start using the stuff again.
I swapped computers in the dome to get the stupid SX wheel stable but of course that means new codes to activate the stupid software.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 26-04-2013, 02:48 PM
multiweb's Avatar
multiweb (Marc)
ze frogginator

multiweb is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Sydney
Posts: 22,080
As I suspected that higher res version is sublime. Well done.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 26-04-2013, 03:32 PM
alistairsam's Avatar
alistairsam
Registered User

alistairsam is offline
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Box Hill North, Vic
Posts: 1,838
that's unreal Robin, stars look amazing. and with the 9um pixel and resolution, the FOV is pretty cool. is this a 12" F4?
Do you use PEC at all on the EQ6 or just guiding with the OAG?

edit: just noticed that small bubble at the bottom left. is that an artefact or a nebula?
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 27-04-2013, 09:54 AM
Tandum's Avatar
Tandum (Robin)
Registered User

Tandum is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Wynnum West, Brisbane.
Posts: 4,166
That's a GSO 12" F4 Alistair. I strengthened the tube around the focuser with some Galv sheeting, Tapped a couple more grub screws into the focuser to stop it rocking, Flocked it with protostar flock board, replaced the wobbly spider and holder with one from astrosystems and plugged an ASA 3" corrector and OAG in front of the atik. I cropped 25% off the right side of this image to balance it up. There's no Pec setup and it has 25Kgs in counterweigths on the eq6, I thought it would be on an eq8 by now but no sign of that yet and I haven't tried this outside of the dome. It could do with another focuser, this one is having real trouble lifting the weight.

Didn't notice that bubble till you mentioned it. Might get a better look with some S2/O3?

I did get some S2 Marc but will have to wait for the Moon to go before trying O3 again, it's just being washed out by the moon.
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 27-04-2013, 10:05 AM
peter_4059's Avatar
peter_4059 (Peter)
Big Scopes are Cool

peter_4059 is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: SE Tasmania
Posts: 4,574
The second version is great Robin. Shame the moon is always around on the clear nights up here!
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 27-04-2013, 10:23 AM
gregbradley's Avatar
gregbradley
Registered User

gregbradley is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Sydney
Posts: 18,185
Nice work Robin. I find the 2nd version oversharpened myself but that's my taste. I prefer the stars to have a soft halo. Otherwise its a pleasing image.

I'd also try 20 minute subs. 10 minutes is a bit short for narrowband unless you are getting tracking issues with longer subs. You've got to get the signal high enough over the noise floor to get the fainter parts.
John Gleason is the best in the business for Ha and I notice he uses 40minute 1x1 subs at F5. You need stable weather for 40 minute subs. I may even try that myself tonight and see how it looks.

Greg.
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 27-04-2013, 10:27 AM
Tandum's Avatar
Tandum (Robin)
Registered User

Tandum is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Wynnum West, Brisbane.
Posts: 4,166
Looking a bit cloudy again anyway Pete, good chance for me to play with my hackintosh

I get a lot of aircraft here greg, it needs to be pretty late at night to do 20minute+ subs otherwise most have aircraft in them and i've found rotation starts to show up when i go over 30minutes. Ha seems ok on this target at 10 minutes, I did get some 15minutes binned x2 on S2 and tried some 15minute binx1 O3 but the O3's are full of gradients and rubbish from the moon, no good at all.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +10. The time is now 03:47 AM.

Powered by vBulletin Version 3.8.7 | Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Advertisement
Astrophotography Prize
Advertisement
Bintel
Advertisement