Go Back   IceInSpace > Images > Deep Space
Register FAQ Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread
  #1  
Old 18-03-2013, 09:01 AM
jsmoraes's Avatar
jsmoraes (Jorge)
Registered User

jsmoraes is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Saquarema, RJ , Brazil
Posts: 1,102
Ngc 5128

Some times it is better you go back to your bed ! From 18 only 4 worthy ! Five hours of fighting against all.

large scale: http://www.astrobin.com/full/36226/?mod=none

GSO 305 mm - Canon Rebel XT - iso 1600 - 4 x 120 sec
Attached Thumbnails
Click for full-size image (ngc5128_mar12_crop_5k.jpg)
156.2 KB92 views

Last edited by jsmoraes; 18-03-2013 at 09:26 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 19-03-2013, 01:22 AM
astronobob's Avatar
astronobob (Bob)
Casual Cosmos Capturer

astronobob is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Gold Coast SE QLD
Posts: 4,469
Great effort Jorge, I find it quiet a challenging target actually,, You have done well considering the few subs ,,
Top stuff
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 19-03-2013, 09:25 AM
Ross G
Registered User

Ross G is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Cherrybrook, NSW
Posts: 5,013
Nice photo Jorge.

Never give up. 4 shots is still better than 0 shots.

Plenty of time to stay in bed when you get old!

Good luck.

Ross.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 19-03-2013, 12:35 PM
jsmoraes's Avatar
jsmoraes (Jorge)
Registered User

jsmoraes is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Saquarema, RJ , Brazil
Posts: 1,102
Thank you, bob em Ross.

And working in other photos I managed to recover someone. Not perfectly, but it let to me to use them.

Now, 12 x 120 sec

large scale: http://www.astrobin.com/full/36341/?mod=none
Attached Thumbnails
Click for full-size image (ngc5128_mar12_crop_5ka.jpg)
132.1 KB36 views
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 19-03-2013, 12:53 PM
alistairsam's Avatar
alistairsam
Registered User

alistairsam is offline
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Box Hill North, Vic
Posts: 1,838
That's a fine effort Jorge, but I think you smoothed the second one a bit too much.
the first one looked sharp.
Cheers
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 19-03-2013, 01:58 PM
jsmoraes's Avatar
jsmoraes (Jorge)
Registered User

jsmoraes is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Saquarema, RJ , Brazil
Posts: 1,102
I had to smooth the stars because I had problems (one of many) with guiding. Only in 4 photos the stars have good shape. And I used them on the first. On the second I used others 8 photos with bad shape. To reduce the ugly appearance, the minimum filter of Photoshop was applied. ... and shear and spherize and ... and ...

Really it was not a good night. But the second shows more details of galaxy.

Perhaps the composition of these 2 photos will result a better image.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 21-03-2013, 10:22 PM
stevous67 (Steve M)
Registered User

stevous67 is offline
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 633
Hello Jorge,

Your first image is my preference, with nice detail from only four subs.

You're always improving!

Regards

Steve
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 21-03-2013, 11:34 PM
alexandre's Avatar
alexandre (Alexandre)
Sandro

alexandre is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 105
Wink

Hello Jorge .
I find this very beautiful image, I imagine what that could give with more images!!

See you soon.
@lex
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 22-03-2013, 01:42 AM
jsmoraes's Avatar
jsmoraes (Jorge)
Registered User

jsmoraes is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Saquarema, RJ , Brazil
Posts: 1,102
Thanks steve and alexandre.

So soon the rain and clouds allow, I will try again. And this time I will check the equipments so that everything works fine.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +10. The time is now 10:57 PM.

Powered by vBulletin Version 3.8.7 | Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Advertisement
Bintel
Advertisement