K3 CCD Tools vs Registax

jjjnettie (Jeanette) · #1 24-05-2006, 12:24 PM

Out of curiosity I processed the same avi using K3 CCD Tools and then with Registax.
There's only the most subtle difference between the two finished pics.

iceman (Mike) · #2 24-05-2006, 12:34 PM

Very interesting.. i've never used k3ccdtools to process an avi - only for capture.

Good experiment, I might have to do one of my own too.

ving (David) · #3 24-05-2006, 02:47 PM

i had no idea that k3 could process pics

well done!

Robert_T · #4 24-05-2006, 04:34 PM

nice one jjjnettie, I used to process in K3CCD all the time as it's quicker and less complicated than Registax. In the end I've gravitated to Registax 3 as it's more flexible and configurable via the wavelet settings etc.

cheers,

jjjnettie (Jeanette) · #5 24-05-2006, 05:19 PM

Ving, I had to take the stacked image from K3 over to Regi to do the wavelets.