Go Back   IceInSpace > Equipment > Equipment Discussions

Reply
 
Thread Tools Rating: Thread Rating: 2 votes, 5.00 average.
  #1  
Old 09-05-2012, 06:40 PM
Shiggy's Avatar
Shiggy (Shaun)
Registered User

Shiggy is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Auckland
Posts: 40
A couple of refractors.

I have had my eye on an Astro Tech AT111EDT triplet refractor for a while and have recently come across the Explore Scientific ES102 triplet.
The explore scientific is on special for $1000 USD (usually $1399) and comes with rings, finder, diagonal etc.
The astro tech is $1595 USD + $100 for rings. It also has a pretty robust rotatable imaging focuser.
In either case I will want a field flattener too for imaging. Something like AT2FF for $150.

The main differences seem (to my very amateur knowledge) to be:
Aperture 111 vs 102
Glass, ohara vs hoya (not sure how different they are)

What do you think?
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 09-05-2012, 08:40 PM
Nico13's Avatar
Nico13 (Ken)
Galaxy Hunting

Nico13 is offline
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Geelong region.
Posts: 947
Don't know about Ohara but Hoya have been around for a very long time and make very fine glass, been buying Hoya filters for my camera passion for around 30 years.
They both look to have pretty good build quality I guess someone will know more about them.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 11-05-2012, 03:46 PM
fornax's Avatar
fornax (Phil)
deliberately buried ...

fornax is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Adelaide
Posts: 25
as far as I know, the Explore Scientific triplet is the same as the Meade & Celestron ones and are HiOptic-based. Matthew Lovell can sell you one from his Adelaide distribution and would probably be cheaper then importing from the US
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 11-05-2012, 09:00 PM
anj026's Avatar
anj026
Plyscope

anj026 is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Perth
Posts: 532
I have no direct experience of either of these scopes but if it was me I would choose the AT111 for the following reasons.

The lens was designed by Thomas Back. See this review. http://www.cloudynights.com/item.php?item_id=1890

Joe Nastasi of Parallax Instruments owned one and commented favourably.

Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +10. The time is now 06:08 AM.

Powered by vBulletin Version 3.8.7 | Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Advertisement
Astrophotography Prize
Advertisement
Bintel
Advertisement