#1  
Old 18-02-2012, 07:06 PM
galaxy (Vaidya)
Registered User

galaxy is offline
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Brisbane
Posts: 87
Question tak FS60/q refractor

Can any one used to this scope advise
i am planning to buy this compact scope and gettting used to the system. It takes 1.25 diagonal as standard . does it need extension to focus 1.25 eyepeices?
can 2inch diagonal adpated to its focusser?
Thanks
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 19-02-2012, 10:13 AM
jamespierce (James)
Registered User

jamespierce is offline
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Australia
Posts: 321
It will focus fine with a 1.25 diagonal for 99% of lenses. The extension tube is required for straight through viewing. It is possible to get a 2" adaptor, but it's somewhat limited to which Eps will come to focus, and which diagonals are compatible.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 20-02-2012, 02:54 PM
Profiler (Profiler)
Registered User

Profiler is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Sydney
Posts: 1,217
I agree with the previous post for the standard FS-60C however I am not sure what are focus parameters for the FS-60Q model or when the FS-60C is fitted with the new Q extension tube in front of the focuser.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 20-02-2012, 02:56 PM
jamespierce (James)
Registered User

jamespierce is offline
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Australia
Posts: 321
My fault ! I missed the Q ... I think you may be right, the Q version has a heap more back focus... The extension tube may be required for the 1.25 diag (one should be included however) ... it makes life easier for the 2" adaptor with much more room to play.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 20-02-2012, 03:38 PM
anj026's Avatar
anj026
Plyscope

anj026 is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Perth
Posts: 532
A recent thread on Cloudy Nights forum;
http://www.cloudynights.com/ubbthrea.../o/all/fpart/1

Andy
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 20-02-2012, 03:46 PM
anj026's Avatar
anj026
Plyscope

anj026 is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Perth
Posts: 532
Ed Ting has just done a review of the standard FS60C SV.
http://www.scopereviews.com/page1ad.html

Andy
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 21-02-2012, 07:25 PM
galaxy (Vaidya)
Registered User

galaxy is offline
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Brisbane
Posts: 87
Ed Ting review on FS60 csv says extension required even with diagonal. May be this model is more for imaging as its short tube .The current model FS60CB /q seems to have enough travel for visual use with out needing too many extras.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 21-02-2012, 07:39 PM
galaxy (Vaidya)
Registered User

galaxy is offline
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Brisbane
Posts: 87
you are right james.This from cloudynights thread.The latest version F 60CB/Q model has enough travel for visual use unlike 60C.

quote" Hyia mention the review from the great Ed Ting (http://www.cloudynights.com/ubbthrea...emlins/bow.gif). Mr. Ting talks about the focus issues with his scope when configure the top line in the given diagram. He reviewed the FS-60C and maybe not the FS-60CB. These sopes are different. Maybe this is the reason why Ed Ting is having an issue with it.

So when you buy the FS-60CB, you will not having this problem and don't need any extra tubes. "
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 21-02-2012, 08:03 PM
blink138's Avatar
blink138 (Pat)
Registered User

blink138 is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: perth w.a.
Posts: 2,276
did you see the fsq60 for sale on this site, only withdrawn today but will still be available im sure
pat
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 21-02-2012, 08:15 PM
UniPol
Registered User

UniPol is offline
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Lithgow, NSW
Posts: 1,685
The FS-60C..CSV..CB.. all share the same objective i.e. D60mm/FL355mm only the tube lengths differ. When I have the time I'll post some pics of the relative tube lengths plus accutrements of each model and the latest 1.7X tube additions which I have collected over recent years. From my involvment in amateur astronomy spanning over nearly 40 years the humble 60mm (2.4") refractor offers a lot in terms of relatively large field of view, ease of portability and satisfying views of the more common astronomical objects.
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 22-02-2012, 06:25 PM
galaxy (Vaidya)
Registered User

galaxy is offline
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Brisbane
Posts: 87
Is a viewfinder really needed for this scope and if so which is the ideal one ?
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +10. The time is now 05:32 AM.

Powered by vBulletin Version 3.8.7 | Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Advertisement
Astrophotography Prize
Advertisement
Bintel
Advertisement