Go Back   IceInSpace > Equipment > Equipment Discussions

Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread
  #1  
Old 29-11-2011, 11:56 AM
mental4astro's Avatar
mental4astro (Alexander)
kids+wife+scopes=happyman

mental4astro is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: sydney, australia
Posts: 5,005
C8 with loose secondary housing

Hi folks,

I've got to do some TLC on a mate's C8. The other night looking through it for the first time, the image revealled a nasty case of miscollimation. When I fit the allen key in one of the three collimation screws I found that the entire secondary mirror housing was loose on the corrector plate.

Removing the corrector plate isn't a problem. I'll mark the corrector plate's current position relative to the tube, that's fine. But how does the secondary's housing actually attach to the corrector plate? I don't notice any other screws on the secondary other than the three collimation screws.

Cheers,

Alex.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 29-11-2011, 12:02 PM
dannat's Avatar
dannat (Daniel)
daniel

dannat is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Macedon shire, Australia
Posts: 3,427
my orange c8 has a central screw

i wonder if it underneath the plastic cap maybe
Attached Thumbnails
Click for full-size image (c8glass.jpg)
77.8 KB79 views
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 29-11-2011, 12:19 PM
mental4astro's Avatar
mental4astro (Alexander)
kids+wife+scopes=happyman

mental4astro is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: sydney, australia
Posts: 5,005
If I remember correctly (it's not infront of me right now) there is no central bolt. Just the three collimation hex-head screws.

The secondary housing is totally loose. I can jiggle it on the corrector, as it has not only lateral movement, but also vertical.

I'll look to post a pic or two later on tonight if that helps.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 29-11-2011, 12:41 PM
Omaroo's Avatar
Omaroo (Chris Malikoff)
Let there be night...

Omaroo is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Hobart, TAS
Posts: 7,639
If I remember correctly, isn't the secondary's baffle tube threaded, holding the whole assembly tight?
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 29-11-2011, 12:46 PM
mental4astro's Avatar
mental4astro (Alexander)
kids+wife+scopes=happyman

mental4astro is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: sydney, australia
Posts: 5,005
I'll have a look. I'll be checking for the correct orientation of the corrector plate, so I'll be needing to remove the retention ring for that, so I can double check the baffle, and recentre the secondary.

Should there be any type of soft 'washer' between the corrector and the secondary housing, rubber, cork, or something else?
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 29-11-2011, 06:26 PM
GeoffW1's Avatar
GeoffW1 (Geoff)
Registered User

GeoffW1 is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Sydney
Posts: 1,847
Hi,

Some information here.

http://www.nexstarsite.com/OddsNEnds...torRemoval.htm

http://www.wilmslowastro.com/tips/c1...alignment.html

http://www.celestron.com/c3/support3...articleid=2224

http://www.astromart.com/articles/ar...article_id=594

The later model Celestron SCT don't have a central screw holding the secondary mirror back.

The secondary housing on mine was retained in the corrector by means like that described in the links. The retaining ring isn't done up ultra tight to avoid cracking the corrector, and I found that it was ideal to have tightness enough to stop it moving around by itself, but not so much that I could not adjust the centering of the secondary by a firm push.

Cheers

Last edited by GeoffW1; 29-11-2011 at 06:48 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 29-11-2011, 07:21 PM
multiweb's Avatar
multiweb (Marc)
ze frogginator

multiweb is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Sydney
Posts: 22,080
The secondary mirror cell is threaded into a retaining ring which is on the other side of the corrector. Usually there are a couple of spacers on each side of the glass. Make sure you put the spacers back in the same side. The secondary should have a line at the back and that needs to be in line with the corrector (sometime an X mark in the glass). This mark needs to be at 3 o'clock looking at the scope from the front usually inline with the focusing knob on the other side.

Putting the corrector back is a no brainer. Just mark the edges. Make sure you know which side is in and out. Lateral position is not that critical. What is critical is the orientation of your secondary in relation to your corrector plate and the primary. Just 5 degrees out and you might not be able to reach focus with your scope. Also do not tighten the corrector outer ring. Just contact, no pressure. That's it. Hand tight, barely touching.

Other than that that 's pretty much it.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 06-12-2011, 09:56 PM
GeoffW1's Avatar
GeoffW1 (Geoff)
Registered User

GeoffW1 is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Sydney
Posts: 1,847
Alex,

How did it go?

Cheers
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 07-12-2011, 07:03 PM
Poita (Peter)
Registered User

Poita is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: NSW Country
Posts: 3,586
By all reports it went extremely well, but I'll let Alex give out the details.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 08-12-2011, 10:21 AM
Poita (Peter)
Registered User

Poita is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: NSW Country
Posts: 3,586
Alex was able to secure the secondary and get the collimation pretty much perfect, resulting in stunning images at both high and low powers.
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 08-12-2011, 11:06 AM
mental4astro's Avatar
mental4astro (Alexander)
kids+wife+scopes=happyman

mental4astro is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: sydney, australia
Posts: 5,005
Yep, as Peter said, it went very well!

Prior to making the adjustment, the poor Cat gave a very dodgey image. Low power stars showed a 'tail' and high power was impossible to use.

Post adjustment, holy cow! I first secured the secondary and then checked the collimation - Unless I was doing imaging with this C8, I really wouldn't attempt to collimate any more. We fluked a position on securing the secondary that gave a collimation result within a bee's d..k of perfect.

The Moon was extraoridanary, and M42 was brilliant for light polluted skies and a first quarter Moon to contend with, & with pin sharp stars at high magnification.

The process went smoothly. All the marking to look out for were there. It paid big time to ask and read the posted links!!!!

Many thanks everyone for your considered advice, .
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +10. The time is now 05:58 AM.

Powered by vBulletin Version 3.8.7 | Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Advertisement
Bintel
Advertisement
Astrophotography Prize
Advertisement