Go Back   IceInSpace > Images > Solar System

Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread
  #1  
Old 06-10-2011, 01:45 AM
midnight's Avatar
midnight (Darrin)
Always on the road

midnight is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Australind, WA
Posts: 891
Refractor vs Schmidt Newtonian - Moon

Hi All!

It's good to be back home imaging again after work travels and I thought I would target my old favourite - Moon.

I have added a WO FLT110 to the test with my trusty SN 8" LXD55 and here is a comparison. Personally I think the SN is slightly better but I am rapped in the new Moonlite focuser for my LXD55. Such a leap forward (and excellant service btw) & I'm more comfortable now with the SN for imaging.

Details :

Subject : Moon 3 October 2010. Taken from 9:40pm (FLT 1st) to 10:30pm so the moon was fairly low

1. WO FLT110 + 2xPowermate + DBK41 + IR.
2. Meade LXD55 8"SN + 2 x Powermater + DBK41 + IR

Both were a mosaic of 12 images. All 500 frames with best 400. Stacked in Registax and the same settings applied to both OTA sources. Same wavelet on both.

Both imported into PS and exactly the same processing (level + curve only). Exported to jpg with same settings.

The refractor was noticeably more difficult to align in the mosaic. No flatteners nor other devices except those mentioned used in the imaging train.

The SN image was re-orientated to match the FLT for visual comparison.

Hope you like!

Darrin...
Attached Thumbnails
Click for full-size image (FLT110-Mosaic.jpg)
157.5 KB103 views
Click for full-size image (SN8-Mosaic.jpg)
179.5 KB103 views
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 06-10-2011, 05:26 AM
Derek Klepp's Avatar
Derek Klepp
Registered User

Derek Klepp is offline
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: NE NSW
Posts: 2,469
Great comparison Darrin I went between the two and the SN does seem to be sharper with better resolution. Both good pics though I'd be happy with either.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 06-10-2011, 08:36 PM
michaellxv's Avatar
michaellxv (Michael)
Registered User

michaellxv is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Adelaide, Australia
Posts: 1,581
Both very good images, but I do agree the SN is better.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 08-10-2011, 12:26 PM
midnight's Avatar
midnight (Darrin)
Always on the road

midnight is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Australind, WA
Posts: 891
Quote:
Originally Posted by michaellxv View Post
Both very good images, but I do agree the SN is better.
Thanks Michael. I was always very interested to see a side by side comparison.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Derek Klepp View Post
Great comparison Darrin I went between the two and the SN does seem to be sharper with better resolution. Both good pics though I'd be happy with either.
Thanks Derek. I decided to pull apart my SN after many years of service and clean the mirror and install the new focuser and with the result I got, I am very happy with it. 8 inches vs 4.5 seems to show.

Cheers,
Darrin...
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +10. The time is now 01:09 AM.

Powered by vBulletin Version 3.8.7 | Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Advertisement
Astrophotography Prize
Advertisement
Bintel
Advertisement