Go Back   IceInSpace > Equipment > Equipment Discussions

Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread
  #1  
Old 28-08-2011, 10:25 AM
musab
Registered User

musab is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: ireland
Posts: 13
Has anybody got a william optics 132mm

im really thinking about getting one some say
their ok some say their are amazing but i have
heard that the focuser gives problems but thats
just with heavy CCDs im only useing canon 550D
are they good for the planets iv heard thats what
their great at im a planetery man myself.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 28-08-2011, 10:27 AM
musab
Registered User

musab is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: ireland
Posts: 13
id be very greatful if any of the lads could post any images.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 28-08-2011, 07:43 PM
Alchemy (Clive)
Quietly watching

Alchemy is offline
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Yarra Junction
Posts: 3,044
What kind of images would be useful?

I'm happy with mine, but having said that I haven't had too many scopes 5 or so.

The focuser works fine with my qhy8 but that is a light camera. I want to go to a qhy9 and don't see a problem there.

Planetary imaging.... For less dollars a 12 inch newt would do better, I had one of those, but given I like deep sky the refractor was a better deal.

Pretty much all of the planetary imagers here use large mirrorred scopes, newts or cats , plus a video camera of sorts.

Cheers Clive
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 28-08-2011, 11:56 PM
cfranks (Charles)
Registered User

cfranks is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Tungkillo, South Australia
Posts: 599
I'm happy with mine too but after sending the (non digital) focuser back to WO and they returned it after adjusting it, I replaced it with a Feather Touch. A first class piece of equipment.

Charles
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 29-08-2011, 12:36 AM
Poita (Peter)
Registered User

Poita is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: NSW Country
Posts: 3,586
Something like a C8 or similar might be the go if planets are your bag.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 29-08-2011, 07:33 AM
jjjnettie's Avatar
jjjnettie (Jeanette)
Registered User

jjjnettie is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Monto
Posts: 16,741
Aye, I agree. A big Newtonian is the go for Planetary work, and the money you save by buying that, you can spend on getting a top of the range Planetary camera.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 29-08-2011, 08:32 AM
naskies's Avatar
naskies (Dave)
Registered User

naskies is offline
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Brisbane
Posts: 1,865
(This is my first scope, so take what I say with a grain of salt.)

I very recently picked up a two year old FLT-132 (without the digital focuser) at a great price, as my primary interest is astrophotography of galaxies and nebulae. It's kind of like a giant version of my SLR lenses.

The moon, Jupiter, and Saturn all look amazing through the eyepiece - fantastically sharp, better than most photos I've seen, etc. However, the planets are simply too dim to capture well - the exposures are a bit too long, and so the images get blurred from the atmospheric wavering.

I'm actually considering picking up an 10" or 12" f/4 reflector specifically for solar system objects. If you haven't seen it already, I found Mike Salway's equipment pages to be an interesting and useful read:

http://www.mikesalway.com.au/2008/12...ing-equipment/
http://www.mikesalway.com.au/2008/12...ing-equipment/
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +10. The time is now 05:01 AM.

Powered by vBulletin Version 3.8.7 | Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Advertisement
Astrophotography Prize
Advertisement
Bintel
Advertisement