Go Back   IceInSpace > Equipment > Eyepieces, Barlows and Filters

Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread
  #1  
Old 16-04-2011, 10:30 AM
seeker372011's Avatar
seeker372011 (Narayan)
6EQUJ5

seeker372011 is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Sydney
Posts: 3,663
Is it worth buying a cls filter for imaging

I used to have a 1.25 inch cls. Astromik filter but didn't really find it useful when I had a DSLR
Now I have a QHY 8, and want at least once in a while to image in colour I'd appreciate any wisdom from actual users to inform my buy no buy decision

So do you find it useful? Can you get say 5 minute subs?
My light pollution and gradients are horrible. A simple stretch reveals all the colours of an aurora
very frustrating
Narayan
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 16-04-2011, 02:31 PM
TrevorW
Registered User

TrevorW is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Western Australia
Posts: 8,255
I don't use one with my RC8 and QHY8 up to 10 minute subs

but I'm in Perth suburbs so probably not as bad LP wise

Last edited by TrevorW; 16-04-2011 at 09:06 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 16-04-2011, 02:47 PM
h0ughy's Avatar
h0ughy (David)
Moderator

h0ughy is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: NEWCASTLE NSW Australia
Posts: 33,374
Quote:
Originally Posted by seeker372011 View Post
I used to have a 1.25 inch cls. Astromik filter but didn't really find it useful when I had a DSLR
Now I have a QHY 8, and want at least once in a while to image in colour I'd appreciate any wisdom from actual users to inform my buy no buy decision

So do you find it useful? Can you get say 5 minute subs?
My light pollution and gradients are horrible. A simple stretch reveals all the colours of an aurora
very frustrating
Narayan
Narayan, i use the CLS 2" CCD version, i could do a 15min shot at iso 800 but i settle for 10 min shots at that ISO. You than have a hell of a time colour balancing at the end.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 16-04-2011, 03:52 PM
seeker372011's Avatar
seeker372011 (Narayan)
6EQUJ5

seeker372011 is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Sydney
Posts: 3,663
Quote:
Originally Posted by h0ughy View Post
Narayan, i use the CLS 2" CCD version, i could do a 15min shot at iso 800 but i settle for 10 min shots at that ISO. You than have a hell of a time colour balancing at the end.
Oh yes the colour balance was always an issue,but at least one could go 5 minute subs...worth it perhaps. Is yours the hutch or an astronomik?
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 17-04-2011, 09:30 AM
TheDecepticon
Registered User

TheDecepticon is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 1,223
I never had a great deal of problems with colour balance when using the cls filter, you just need to back of the blue channel a bit if anything.
Probably a better one to look at would be the IDAS LPS filter like one of theses here.

http://starizona.com/acb/IDAS-C737.aspx

Well worth the dollars for where I live. If I didn't have one, I wouldn't be able to get very long subs at all, probably 50 sec max. When I used a light pollution filter, I can get that out to ten minutes, no probs. Unfortunately, the light pollution filters will inadvertently block some of the light you are trying to record, however as with anything, it is a trade off.

For the QHY8, I would reccommend the 48mm screw on version.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +10. The time is now 08:20 PM.

Powered by vBulletin Version 3.8.7 | Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Advertisement
Bintel
Advertisement